A Study to Evaluate CJC 1295 in HIV Patients With Visceral Obesity
ConjuChemn = 120Dec 2005 to Sept 2006
Obesity · HIV Infections
PepBank has 21 CJC-1295 studies with results. 10 of them gave CJC-1295, with 43 results, grouped by what the studies measured. In each group, results from studies in people come first. Data as of 2026-10-30.
Searches 43 results and 36 papers. Newer studies from Europe PMC
Identifiers, parent molecule, targets and development stage, from curated data.
CJC-1295 is a 30-residue analogue of human growth hormone-releasing factor, hGRF(1-29). It carries four changes to the native 1-29 sequence (D-Ala2, Gln8, Ala15, Leu27) and an added C-terminal lysinamide whose side chain bears a 3-maleimidopropionamide group, the drug affinity complex (DAC). The maleimide reacts with the free thiol of Cys34 on serum albumin after injection, which extends the plasma life of the peptide; ConjuChem scientists reported this in rats in 2005 (PMID 15817669) and a half-life of 5.8 to 8.1 days in healthy adults in 2006 (PMID 16352683). Development stopped at phase 2 and no regulator has approved it. In FDA documents this record is 'CJC-1295 DAC'; FDA uses 'CJC-1295 (free base)' for the 29-residue form without DAC (see the Mod GRF (1-29) record).
| Target | Action | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Growth hormone-releasing hormone receptorGHRHRQ02643 (opens in a new tab) | Agonist | primary literatureSource (opens in a new tab) |
Residues, differences from the parent, calculated properties and 3D structure. Source values and calculated values are shown separately.
30 amino acids · 6 modifications
Calculated from the two sequences. Curated notes are shown as given.
25 of 30 aligned residues identical (83%) · 4 substitutions · 1 non-canonical residue · Somatorelin, human GHRH(1-44) 1–30
Differences from the parent
Basis: Jette et al. 2005 identify CJC-1295 as a tetrasubstituted form of hGRF(1-29) with an added N-epsilon-3-maleimidopropionamide derivative of lysine at the C terminus. The 29-residue core matches mature somatoliberin 1-29 at every other position.
Calculated from the two sequences with @pepdb/chem alignToParent (ungapped unless a gap scores higher). The record’s curated notes are shown as given.
Some values cannot be calculated. A modification changes this value and is not modeled here (for example a lipid, metal or linker).
@pepdb/chem 0.2.0 · EMBOSS pKa set · ExPASy residue masses
No charge curve
A modification changes this value and is not modeled here (for example a lipid, metal or linker).
30 residues. Each residue counts in one class; F and W count as aromatic.
Loads the 3D viewer (3Dmol.js, about 150 KB) and the model file from AlphaFold DB (EMBL-EBI).
CJC-1295 (with DAC) has 30 residues. A full-atom drawing is hard to read at this size; the sequence view is the reference.
SMILES fromPubChem CID 91971820(opens in a new tab)
CC[C@H](C)[C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](CC1=CC=CC=C1)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC2=CC=C(C=C2)O)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(=N)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(=N)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCN)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(=O)O)C(=O)N[C@@H]([C@@H](C)CC)C(=O)N[C@@H](CC(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CO)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCNC(=N)N)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCCCNC(=O)CCN3C(=O)C=CC3=O)C(=O)N)NC(=O)[C@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@@H](C)NC(=O)[C@H](CC4=CC=C(C=C4)O)NAn ideal alpha-helix projection. It shows where the hydrophobic residues fall if the peptide folds as a helix. It does not show that it does.
Eisenberg consensus (normalized) scale · + K, R · − D, E
Assumes an ideal α-helix: 100° per residue, 3.6 residues per turn. The arrow is the mean hydrophobic moment (Eisenberg et al. 1984) and points at the hydrophobic face.
| Position | Residue | Angle | Eisenberg consensus (normalized) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Y | 0° | 0.26 |
| 2 | A | 100° | 0.62 |
| 3 | D | 200° | -0.90 |
| 4 | A | 300° | 0.62 |
| 5 | I | 40° | 1.38 |
| 6 | F | 140° | 1.19 |
| 7 | T | 240° | -0.05 |
| 8 | Q | 340° | -0.85 |
| 9 | S | 80° | -0.18 |
| 10 | Y | 180° | 0.26 |
| 11 | R | 280° | -2.53 |
| 12 | K | 20° | -1.50 |
| 13 | V | 120° | 1.08 |
| 14 | L | 220° | 1.06 |
| 15 | A | 320° | 0.62 |
| 16 | Q | 60° | -0.85 |
| 17 | L | 160° | 1.06 |
| 18 | S | 260° | -0.18 |
| 19 | A | 0° | 0.62 |
| 20 | R | 100° | -2.53 |
| 21 | K | 200° | -1.50 |
| 22 | L | 300° | 1.06 |
| 23 | L | 40° | 1.06 |
| 24 | Q | 140° | -0.85 |
| 25 | D | 240° | -0.90 |
| 26 | I | 340° | 1.38 |
| 27 | L | 80° | 1.06 |
| 28 | S | 180° | -0.18 |
| 29 | R | 280° | -2.53 |
| 30 | K | 20° | -1.50 |
People first in each area, then animals, then lab cells. Counts are exact and come from studies that gave the peptide.
PepBank reads each paper before it shows the results. This search looks in Europe PMC for newer papers that PepBank has not read yet.
Counts are exact and come from studies that gave the peptide.
Studies by year
21 of 36 studies have results (58%), published 2005 to 2026. Top row: every study. Bottom row: studies with results about CJC-1295 (with DAC), by class. The rows use different scales.
Studies36 in all, 2005 to 2026
Studies with results21 in all, 2005 to 2026
Retracted studies are left out. A study with results in two classes counts in both.
AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.
Registered trials that test the peptide, with phase, status and dates. A dot marks trials with posted results.
1 trial match. Highest phase first. Data from ClinicalTrials.gov.
1 trial · 1 stopped early
1 trial · 1 stopped early · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)
ConjuChemn = 120Dec 2005 to Sept 2006
Obesity · HIV Infections
Studies on this peptide. Some have results. The others have none yet.
36 studies match. Retracted studies are left out.
Showing 19 of 36 studiesquery qry_cf6b522146df1388430b9020
21 studies in all, 19 on this page
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2012
Thomas et al. 2012Methods (San Diego, Calif.)cited by 75
PMID 21871962DOI 10.1016/j.ymeth.2011.08.009PUB-21871962
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2010
Henninge et al. 2010Drug testing and analysiscited by 51
PMID 21204297DOI 10.1002/dta.233PUB-21204297
Animal study (in vivo) · rat · 2005
Jetté et al. 2005Endocrinologycited by 30
PMID 15817669DOI 10.1210/en.2004-1286PUB-15817669
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 2009
Gautam et al. 2009Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of Americacited by 30
PMID 19332789PMC2662962DOI 10.1073/pnas.0900977106PUB-19332789
Animal study (in vivo) · rat · 2016
Knoop et al. 2016Analytical and bioanalytical chemistrycited by 29
PMID 26879649PMC4830873DOI 10.1007/s00216-016-9377-3PUB-26879649
Randomized controlled trial · 2006
Teichman et al. 2006The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismcited by 28
PMID 16352683DOI 10.1210/jc.2005-1536PUB-16352683
Non-randomized trial · 2009
Sackmann-Sala et al. 2009Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Societyn = 11cited by 26
PMID 19386527PMC2787983DOI 10.1016/j.ghir.2009.03.001PUB-19386527
Non-randomized trial · 2006
Ionescu et al. 2006The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismcited by 25
PMID 17018654DOI 10.1210/jc.2006-1702PUB-17018654
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2013
Kwok et al. 2013Analytical and bioanalytical chemistrycited by 25
PMID 23318763DOI 10.1007/s00216-012-6697-9PUB-23318763
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2021
Memdouh et al. 2021Drug testing and analysiscited by 16
PMID 34665524DOI 10.1002/dta.3183PUB-34665524
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 2006
Alba et al. 2006American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolismcited by 12
PMID 16822960DOI 10.1152/ajpendo.00201.2006PUB-16822960
Observational study · 2016
Van Hout et al. 2016Substance use & misusecited by 10
PMID 26771670DOI 10.3109/10826084.2015.1082595PUB-26771670
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2020
Pont et al. 2020Journal of chromatography. Acited by 7
PMID 32971474DOI 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461548PUB-32971474
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2022
Thomas et al. 2022Analytical science advancescited by 7
PMID 38716080PMC10989627DOI 10.1002/ansa.202200027PUB-38716080
Animal study (in vivo) · horse · 2019
Timms et al. 2019Drug testing and analysiscited by 4
PMID 30489688DOI 10.1002/dta.2554PUB-30489688
Other design · 2022
Danila et al. 2022Talantacited by 4
PMID 34736642DOI 10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122905PUB-34736642
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2024
Thomas et al. 2024Journal of mass spectrometry : JMScited by 4
PMID 38197510DOI 10.1002/jms.4996PUB-38197510
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2022
Coppieters et al. 2022Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysiscited by 3
PMID 35298973DOI 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.114726PUB-35298973
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 2023
Cristea et al. 2023Analytical biochemistrycited by 3
PMID 37806509DOI 10.1016/j.ab.2023.115336PUB-37806509
These studies name CJC-1295 (with DAC) but give no result for it (for example, the results concern another peptide in the study).
PubMed tag: Validation Study · 2015
Thomas et al. 2015Drug testing and analysiscited by 31
PMID 26382721DOI 10.1002/dta.1868PUB-26382721
PubMed tag: none · 2014
Thevis et al. 2014Expert review of proteomicscited by 20
PMID 25382550DOI 10.1586/14789450.2014.965159PUB-25382550
PubMed tag: none · 2016
Pineau et al. 2016Forensic science internationalcited by 8
PMID 27710891DOI 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.09.017PUB-27710891
PubMed tag: Review · 2026
Mayfield et al. 2026The American journal of sports medicinecited by 3
PMID 41476424DOI 10.1177/03635465251357593PUB-41476424
PubMed tag: Review · 2026
Mendias et al. 2026Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)cited by 3
PMID 41966639DOI 10.1007/s40279-026-02437-0PUB-41966639
PubMed tag: review-article, Review · 2026
Mavrych et al. 2026Frontiers in agingcited by 3
PMID 42021992PMC13095733DOI 10.3389/fragi.2026.1790247PUB-42021992
Page 1 of 1
Teichman SL · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2006
Randomized controlled trial · 5 results
Sackmann-Sala L · Growth hormone & IGF research : official journal of the Growth Hormone Research Society and the International IGF Research Society · 2009
Non-randomized trial · 6 results
Ionescu M · The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2006
Non-randomized trial · 7 results
Van Hout MC · Substance use & misuse · 2016
Observational study · 2 results
Gautam D · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2009
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 4 results
Jetté L · Endocrinology · 2005
Animal study (in vivo) · rat · 5 results
Knoop A · Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2016
Animal study (in vivo) · rat · 12 results
Alba M · American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2006
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 10 results
Timms M · Drug testing and analysis · 2019
Animal study (in vivo) · horse · 3 results
Danila GM · Talanta · 2022
Other design · 2 results
Coppieters G · Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2022
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 10 results
Uçaktürk E · Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2026
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 9 results
Kwok WH · Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2013
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 12 results
Memdouh S · Drug testing and analysis · 2021
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 6 results
Pont L · Journal of chromatography. A · 2020
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 7 results
Cristea CD · Analytical biochemistry · 2023
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 8 results
Thomas A · Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2012
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 1 result
Henninge J · Drug testing and analysis · 2010
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 1 result
Thomas A · Analytical science advances · 2022
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 5 results
Thomas A · Journal of mass spectrometry : JMS · 2024
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 5 results
Timms M · Drug testing and analysis · 2019
Not a test of CJC-1295 (with DAC) alone · 1 result
Approval and sport status, and the safety outcomes reported in study results. Laws and labels change, so check the regulator for the current status.
| Jurisdiction | Body | Status | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | FDA | No Drugs@FDA record (openFDA drugsfda searches for CJC-1295 on 2026-10-09 returned no matches). FDA states that compounded drugs containing CJC-1295 may pose an immunogenicity risk for certain routes and may raise peptide-impurity and characterisation problems, that it has identified serious adverse events including increased heart rate and a systemic vasodilatory reaction, and that available clinical data are limited. | 9 Oct 2026 | fda.gov (opens in a new tab) |
| EU | EMA | No match for CJC-1295 in the EMA medicines data file or the EMA orphan designation data file, both downloaded 2026-10-09 (medicines file timestamp 2026-10-09T06:23:44Z, 2,746 records; orphan designations file timestamp 2026-10-09T06:32:20Z, 3,310 records). National authorisations were not checked. | 9 Oct 2026 | ema.europa.eu (opens in a new tab) |
| Sport | WADA | Banned in sport (WADA S2.2.4) Named in S2.2.4 as a GHRH analogue (with CJC-1293) and indexed on page 8. | 2026 List | wada-ama.org (opens in a new tab) |
| World (WADA 2027 list) | Note | The 2027 Prohibited List, in force from 2027-01-01, names CJC-1295 in S2.2.4. | 9 Oct 2026 | wada-ama.org (opens in a new tab) |
2 safety results for CJC-1295 (with DAC).
Reported by FDA, not confirmed in a study
FDA's briefing document of 2024-12-04 relays an anecdotal, unpublished report of a ConjuChem phase 2 trial in HIV lipodystrophy: 192 subjects were enrolled; after the 11th weekly dose one subject had chest discomfort, an acute myocardial infarction was confirmed and the subject died; the attending physician's most likely explanation was asymptomatic coronary artery disease with plaque rupture and occlusion; the study was terminated and its data were not published. The briefing does not name the trial, and its participant number (192) differs from the registry (120), so the link to NCT00267527 is not confirmed.
This is a report about CJC-1295 (with DAC), not a study result. Source: FDA briefing document, CJC-1295-related bulk drug substances, PCAC December 4, 2024
In healthy adults given CJC‑1295, no serious adverse reactions were reported.
Randomized controlled trialn not reported
In online forum threads, users raised concerns about female consequences of CJC‑1295 use, including dosage estimation, cycling and long-term consequences.
Observational studyn not reported
The doses that these studies used. They are not recommendations.
60 or 90 microg/kgHuman
2 microg every 24 hAnimal
2 microg every 48 h or 72 hAnimal
2 microg every 24 h or 48 hAnimal
2 microg every 24 h, 48 h or 72 hAnimal
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
Data version, change history and code for this peptide.
curl -s https:// pepbank.io/ v1/ briefs/ cjc-1295Evidence summary for CJC-1295 (with DAC): counts by class, key results with sources, notices, data version.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated
Top outcomes
The 7 outcome groups with the most study results, by evidence class.
Data version 308560. Bar length is the number of results, not the size of an effect.
Evidence matrix
Study results by outcome and evidence class. Arrows show how the measured outcome moved, not whether the change is good.
| Outcome group | Human | Animal | Lab | Computer model | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Growth hormone and IGF-1Endocrine and hormones | Human: 16 results from 3 studies: 9 increase, 2 decrease, 4 no significant change, 1 not reported. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | Animal: 10 results from 3 studies: 9 increase, 1 decrease. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | Lab: 1 result from 1 study: 1 increase. Strongest design: In vitro (cells) | No results | 27 |
| Patterns of useWhole body | Human: 2 results from 1 study: 2 not reported. Strongest design: Observational study | No results | No results | No results | 2 |
| PharmacokineticsPharmacology | Human: 1 result from 1 study: 1 not reported. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | Animal: 5 results from 3 studies: 1 no significant change, 4 not reported. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | Lab: 1 result from 1 study: 1 increase. Strongest design: In vitro (cell-free) | No results | 7 |
| Adverse eventsWhole body | Human: 1 result from 1 study: 1 no significant change. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | No results | No results | No results | 1 |
| Body weightMetabolic and weight | No results | Animal: 4 results from 1 study: 2 increase, 2 no significant change. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | No results | No results | 4 |
| Bone and jointMusculoskeletal | No results | Animal: 1 result from 1 study: 1 no significant change. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | No results | No results | 1 |
| Receptor activity and mechanismPharmacology | No results | No results | Lab: 1 result from 1 study: 1 decrease. Strongest design: Other design | No results | 1 |
7 outcome groups shown of 7 · 43 study results
Data version 308560. Shade grows with the number of results. Every cell shows the exact count.
Trials by phase
1 registered trial, grouped by phase and shown by status.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, data version 308560. Status is the registry status.