Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Larazotide Acetate for the Relief of CeD Symptoms
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 30729 May 2019 to 21 Jul 2022
Celiac Disease
PepBank has 26 larazotide studies with results. 24 of them gave larazotide, with 91 results, grouped by what the studies measured. In each group, results from studies in people come first. Data as of 2026-10-30.
Searches 91 results and 53 papers. Newer studies from Europe PMC
Identifiers, parent molecule, targets and development stage, from curated data.
Larazotide is an octapeptide with the sequence GGVLVQPG. Larazotide acetate is its acetate salt. The clinical registry describes a phase 3 celiac trial that the sponsor terminated. The query requires larazotide or the AT1001 code with barrier context. It does not use AT-1001 alone.
No molecular target is recorded for this peptide.
Residues, differences from the parent, calculated properties and 3D structure. Source values and calculated values are shown separately.
8 amino acids
No sequence is listed for the parent, so no alignment is shown.IUPHAR and DrugBank describe the sequence as derived from Zot. This describes design ancestry. It does not establish an exact contiguous parent sequence or residue range.
@pepdb/chem 0.2.0 · EMBOSS pKa set · ExPASy residue masses
pI 6.10 · Net charge at pH 7.4: −0.06
Point or use arrow keys
Henderson-Hasselbalch, EMBOSS pKa set. Calculated, not measured.
| pH | Net charge |
|---|---|
| 0 | 1.00 |
| 1 | 1.00 |
| 2 | 0.98 |
| 3 | 0.80 |
| 4 | 0.28 |
| 5 | 0.04 |
| 6 | 0.00 |
| 7 | −0.02 |
| 8 | −0.20 |
| 9 | −0.72 |
| 10 | −0.96 |
| 11 | −1.00 |
| 12 | −1.00 |
| 13 | −1.00 |
| 14 | −1.00 |
8 residues. Each residue counts in one class; F and W count as aromatic.
No 3D structure
No experimental structure (PDB) and no UniProt entry for an AlphaFold model are listed for this peptide. Synthetic peptides often have neither. The sequence view above is the reference.
Draws the structure in your browser with RDKit (about 2.3 MB, loaded once).
SMILES fromPubChem CID 9810532(opens in a new tab)
CC(C)C[C@@H](C(=O)N[C@@H](C(C)C)C(=O)N[C@@H](CCC(=O)N)C(=O)N1CCC[C@H]1C(=O)NCC(=O)O)NC(=O)[C@H](C(C)C)NC(=O)CNC(=O)CNPeople first in each area, then animals, then lab cells. Counts are exact and come from studies that gave the peptide.
PepBank reads each paper before it shows the results. This search looks in Europe PMC for newer papers that PepBank has not read yet.
Counts are exact and come from studies that gave the peptide.
Studies by year
26 of 53 studies have results (49%), published 2012 to 2026. Top row: every study. Bottom row: studies with results about Larazotide, by class. The rows use different scales.
Studies53 in all, 2012 to 2026
Studies with results26 in all, 2012 to 2026
Retracted studies are left out. A study with results in two classes counts in both.
AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.
Registered trials that test the peptide, with phase, status and dates. A dot marks trials with posted results.
10 trials match. Highest phase first. Data from ClinicalTrials.gov.
10 trials · 8 completed · 2 stopped early
Safety and Tolerability Study of Larazotide Acetate in Celiac Disease Subjects
NCT0036285613 Sept 2006 to 6 Mar 2007
Study to Assess the Efficacy of Larazotide Acetate for the Treatment of Celiac Disease
NCT00492960Aug 2007 to Mar 2009
Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Larazotide Acetate in Subjects With Active Celiac Disease
NCT00620451Feb 2008 to Dec 2009
A Double-blind Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate Larazotide Acetate for the Treatment of Celiac Disease
NCT013962137 Nov 2011 to 20 Aug 2013
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Larazotide Acetate for the Relief of CeD Symptoms
NCT0356900729 May 2019 to 21 Jul 2022
10 trials · 8 completed · 2 stopped early · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 30729 May 2019 to 21 Jul 2022
Celiac Disease
Massachusetts General Hospitaln = 10731 May 2023 to 18 Jun 2026
Long COVID · Long COVID-19 · Post Acute COVID-19 Syndrome · Post Acute Sequelae of COVID-19
Massachusetts General Hospitaln = 121 Oct 2021 to 15 May 2024
Covid19 · Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 171Aug 2007 to Mar 2009
Celiac Disease
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 105Feb 2008 to Dec 2009
Celiac Disease
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 42Apr 2009 to Apr 2010
Celiac Disease
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 3427 Nov 2011 to 20 Aug 2013
Celiac Disease
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 8013 Sept 2006 to 6 Mar 2007
Celiac Disease
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 2410 Jan 2006 to 27 Feb 2006
Healthy
9 Meters Biopharma, Inc.n = 2129 Nov 2005 to 26 Jan 2006
Celiac Disease
Studies on this peptide. Some have results. The others have none yet.
53 studies match. Retracted studies are left out.
Showing 24 of 53 studiesquery qry_1770cde4e4020b2e6ac0f1e1
26 studies in all, 14 on this page
Other design · 2020
Tajik et al. 2020Nature communicationscited by 401
PMID 32332732PMC7181728DOI 10.1038/s41467-020-15831-7PUB-32332732
Case report or series · 2021
Yonker et al. 2021The Journal of clinical investigationn = 1cited by 218
PMID 34032635PMC8279585DOI 10.1172/jci149633PUB-34032635
Randomized controlled trial · 2015
Leffler et al. 2015Gastroenterologyn = 342cited by 178
PMID 25683116PMC4446229DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.02.008PUB-25683116
Randomized controlled trial · 2013
Kelly et al. 2013Alimentary pharmacology & therapeuticsn = 184cited by 147
PMID 23163616DOI 10.1111/apt.12147PUB-23163616
Randomized controlled trial · 2012
Leffler et al. 2012The American journal of gastroenterologyn = 86cited by 138
PMID 22825365PMC3463856DOI 10.1038/ajg.2012.211PUB-22825365
In vitro (cells) · mouse · 2018
Pearce et al. 2018BMC biologycited by 109
PMID 29391007PMC5793346DOI 10.1186/s12915-018-0481-zPUB-29391007
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 2012
Gopalakrishnan et al. 2012Peptidescited by 95
PMID 22401908DOI 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.02.015PUB-22401908
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 2017
Sturgeon et al. 2017Annals of the New York Academy of Sciencescited by 65
PMID 28423466PMC5479715DOI 10.1111/nyas.13343PUB-28423466
In vitro (cells) · 2012
Gopalakrishnan et al. 2012Peptidescited by 59
PMID 22401910DOI 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.02.016PUB-22401910
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 2022
Silverman et al. 2022Frontiers in immunologycited by 58
PMID 36032126PMC9405438DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2022.897971PUB-36032126
In vitro (cell-free) · 2020
Di Micco et al. 2020Frontiers in chemistrycited by 21
PMID 33520943PMC7843458DOI 10.3389/fchem.2020.628609PUB-33520943
Case report or series · 2022
Yonker et al. 2022Critical care explorationsn = 26cited by 17
PMID 35211683PMC8860335DOI 10.1097/cce.0000000000000641PUB-35211683
In vitro (cells) · 2022
Di Micco et al. 2022European journal of medicinal chemistrycited by 16
PMID 36332548PMC9579148DOI 10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114857PUB-36332548
Ex vivo tissue · pig · 2021
Slifer et al. 2021PloS onecited by 11
PMID 33886649PMC8061941DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0250165PUB-33886649
25 studies in all, 10 on this page
PubMed tag: review-article, Review · 2016
Khaleghi et al. 2016Therapeutic advances in gastroenterologycited by 69
PMID 26770266PMC4699279DOI 10.1177/1756283x15616576PUB-26770266
PubMed tag: review-article, Review · 2023
Veres-Székely et al. 2023International journal of molecular sciencescited by 68
PMID 37108711PMC10139156DOI 10.3390/ijms24087548PUB-37108711
PubMed tag: Review · 2019
Valitutti et al. 2019Digestive diseases and sciencescited by 54
PMID 31076989PMC6586517DOI 10.1007/s10620-019-05646-yPUB-31076989
PubMed tag: Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review · 2022
Hoilat et al. 2022Clinics and research in hepatology and gastroenterologycited by 43
PMID 34339872DOI 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101782PUB-34339872
PubMed tag: review-article, Review · 2021
Slifer et al. 2021American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiologycited by 35
PMID 33881350PMC11735010DOI 10.1152/ajpgi.00386.2020PUB-33881350
PubMed tag: Review · 2012
Crespo Pérez et al. 2012European journal of internal medicinecited by 28
PMID 22153524DOI 10.1016/j.ejim.2011.08.030PUB-22153524
PubMed tag: Review · 2021
Troisi et al. 2021Current medicinal chemistrycited by 28
PMID 33397225DOI 10.2174/0929867328666210104110053PUB-33397225
PubMed tag: Review · 2015
McCarville et al. 2015Current opinion in pharmacologycited by 21
PMID 26414923DOI 10.1016/j.coph.2015.09.002PUB-26414923
PubMed tag: Letter · 2021
Sollid et al. 2021Gutcited by 14
PMID 33443022DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-323829PUB-33443022
PubMed tag: Review · 2021
Kulkarni et al. 2021European journal of pharmacologycited by 12
PMID 34418405DOI 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174434PUB-34418405
These studies name Larazotide but give no result for it (for example, the results concern another peptide in the study).
PubMed tag: none · 2021
Di Micco et al. 2021International journal of molecular sciencescited by 18
PMID 34502335PMC8431481DOI 10.3390/ijms22179427PUB-34502335
Page 1 of 1
Leffler DA · Gastroenterology · 2015
Randomized controlled trial · 9 results
Leffler DA · The American journal of gastroenterology · 2012
Randomized controlled trial · 5 results
Kelly CP · Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics · 2013
Randomized controlled trial · 6 results
Yonker LM · Science translational medicine · 2025
Randomized controlled trial · 4 results
Yonker LM · Critical care explorations · 2022
Case report or series · 5 results
Yonker LM · The Journal of clinical investigation · 2021
Case report or series · 3 results
Gopalakrishnan S · Peptides · 2012
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 8 results
Sturgeon C · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2017
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 5 results
Silverman GJ · Frontiers in immunology · 2022
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 1 result
Mao XD · Journal of dental research · 2023
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 2 results
Sun S · Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 2 results
Mao X · International journal of oral science · 2025
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 3 results
Caliskan AR · Human & experimental toxicology · 2021
Animal study (in vivo) · rat · 7 results
Karahan D · Digestive diseases and sciences · 2024
Animal study (in vivo) · rat · 4 results
Martinez EE · International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 3 results
Yamamoto K · Digestion · 2026
Animal study (in vivo) · mouse · 2 results
Tajik N · Nature communications · 2020
Other design · 2 results
Slifer ZM · PloS one · 2021
Ex vivo tissue · pig · 9 results
Pearce SC · BMC biology · 2018
In vitro (cells) · mouse · 1 result
Gopalakrishnan S · Peptides · 2012
In vitro (cells) · 8 results
Di Micco S · European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
In vitro (cells) · 1 result
Kim J · Biomedicines · 2025
In vitro (cells) · 5 results
Glinka DM · JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2025
In vitro (cells) · 2 results
Di Micco S · Frontiers in chemistry · 2020
In vitro (cell-free) · 5 results
Yu F · Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
Not a test of Larazotide alone · 12 results
Song KH · The Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology · 2012
Not a test of Larazotide alone · 2 results
Approval and sport status, and the safety outcomes reported in study results. Laws and labels change, so check the regulator for the current status.
| Jurisdiction | Body | Status | As of | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US | FDA | No US medicinal approval was established from the reviewed sources. | 21 Oct 2026 | Not recorded |
| EU | EMA | No central or national medicinal approval was established from the reviewed sources. | 21 Oct 2026 | Not recorded |
| Sport | WADA | Status unknown Not specifically named. | 2026 List | wada-ama.org (opens in a new tab) |
8 safety results for Larazotide.
In adults with celiac disease, larazotide safety was comparable with placebo.
Randomized controlled trialn = 342
In patients with coeliac disease during gluten challenge, adverse event rates were similar with larazotide and placebo.
Randomized controlled trialn = 184
In patients with celiac disease, larazotide was generally well tolerated.
Randomized controlled trialn = 86
In the celiac disease trial, no serious adverse events were observed.
Randomized controlled trialn = 86
In the celiac disease trial, headache and urinary tract infection were the most common adverse events; arm-specific rates were not reported.
Randomized controlled trialn = 86
In children with MISC, no larazotide-related adverse events were reported.
Randomized controlled trialn = 12
Four children with MIS-C given larazotide as an adjuvant to steroid and/or intravenous immunoglobulin therapy tolerated it without adverse effects.
Case report or seriesn = 4
In zonulin transgenic mice, AT1001 completely reversed DSS-associated mortality.
Animal study (in vivo)mouse
The doses that these studies used. They are not recommendations.
0.5 mg 3 times dailyHuman
0.25, 1, 4, or 8 mg three times per dayHuman
1, 4, or 8 mg three times dailyHuman
1 mg 3 times dailyHuman
2 mg 3 times dailyHuman
1 mg three times dailyHuman
6 of 15 shown
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
Data version, change history and code for this peptide.
curl -s https:// pepbank.io/ v1/ briefs/ larazotideEvidence summary for Larazotide: counts by class, key results with sources, notices, data version.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated
Top outcomes
The 8 outcome groups with the most study results, by evidence class.
Data version 308560. Bar length is the number of results, not the size of an effect.
Evidence matrix
Study results by outcome and evidence class. Arrows show how the measured outcome moved, not whether the change is good.
| Outcome group | Human | Animal | Lab | Computer model | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal protectionGastrointestinal | Human: 12 results from 5 studies: 3 increase, 4 decrease, 4 no significant change, 1 mixed. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | Animal: 13 results from 7 studies: 1 increase, 9 decrease, 1 no significant change, 2 not reported. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | Lab: 18 results from 5 studies: 4 increase, 10 decrease, 2 no significant change, 2 not reported. Strongest design: Ex vivo tissue | Computer model: 1 result from 1 study: 1 not reported. Strongest design: In silico | 44 |
| Adverse eventsWhole body | Human: 7 results from 5 studies: 2 no significant change, 5 not reported. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | No results | No results | No results | 7 |
| Antiviral activityInfection | Human: 3 results from 3 studies: 1 increase, 2 decrease. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | No results | Lab: 3 results from 2 studies: 2 decrease, 1 not reported. Strongest design: In vitro (cells) | No results | 6 |
| Immune responseImmune and inflammation | Human: 3 results from 1 study: 3 decrease. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | Animal: 1 result from 1 study: 1 decrease. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | No results | No results | 4 |
| Exercise and physical functionWhole body | Human: 2 results from 2 studies: 1 increase, 1 decrease. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | No results | No results | No results | 2 |
| Inflammation markersImmune and inflammation | Human: 1 result from 1 study: 1 decrease. Strongest design: Case report or series | Animal: 1 result from 1 study: 1 decrease. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | No results | No results | 2 |
| Intensive care and hospital outcomesWhole body | Human: 1 result from 1 study: 1 decrease. Strongest design: Case report or series | No results | No results | No results | 1 |
| Overall treatment effectWhole body | Human: 1 result from 1 study: 1 increase. Strongest design: Case report or series | No results | No results | No results | 1 |
| PainNervous system and cognition | Human: 1 result from 1 study: 1 decrease. Strongest design: Randomized controlled trial | No results | No results | No results | 1 |
| Receptor activity and mechanismWhole body | No results | Animal: 4 results from 4 studies: 2 increase, 1 decrease, 1 no significant change. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | Lab: 8 results from 1 study: 7 increase, 1 decrease. Strongest design: In vitro (cells) | No results | 12 |
| Liver fat and liver functionLiver | No results | Animal: 3 results from 1 study: 1 decrease, 2 no significant change. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | No results | No results | 3 |
| Bone and jointMusculoskeletal | No results | Animal: 2 results from 2 studies: 1 increase, 1 decrease. Strongest design: Animal study (in vivo) | No results | No results | 2 |
12 outcome groups shown of 17 · 91 study results
Data version 308560. Shade grows with the number of results. Every cell shows the exact count.
Trials by phase
10 registered trials, grouped by phase and shown by status.
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov, data version 308560. Status is the registry status.