Social Cognition Composite Measure
| Group | Value (Change in z-score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inactive Nasal Spray | 0.10 | 0.35 |
| Intranasal Oxytocin | 0.23 | 0.36 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedNot applicableResults postedRegistry dataUnited States
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Does Acute Oxytocin Administration Enhance Social Cognition in Individuals With Schizophrenia?
NCT01312272Apr 2011 to Aug 2012
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
Individuals with schizophrenia have been found to have deficits in social cognition, which is defined as the functions that are engaged during social interactions. Social cognition has been found to be critical in predicting multiple aspects of community functioning. There are no currently available medications that have been consistently found to improve social cognition in individuals with schizophrenia. Oxytocin functions as a neurotransmitter that is thought to be involved in multiple aspects of social behavior and related emotions. In this study, we test the hypothesis that acute administration of intranasal oxytocin will improve social cognition in individuals with schizophrenia.
Placebo comparator
Inactive nasal spray
A placebo nasal spray will be prepared to be otherwise identical to the active treatment nasal spray except lacking oxytocin. The ingredients in the inactive nasal spray are mannitol, glycerin, and preserved water.
Experimental
Intranasal Oxytocin
Oxytocin nasal spray (40 units/ml) will be administered in a single intranasal dose of 40 IU. Its formula is: oxytocin 1 unit/mg mannitol trituration 0.2Gm + glycerin USP 0.1ml + preserved water 5ml.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Social Cognition Composite Measure
Time frame · Visit 2 (baseline), Visit 3 (1 week following, post-treatment)
Our primary outcome measure will be a composite score created by calculating the mean of the four main social cognition measures assessed in this study (two "high-level" measures and two "low-level" measures). Because these measures are not on the same scale, we will first z-score (center and scale) each of the four measures at each time point using the baseline mean and standard deviation of the whole sample and then calculate the mean of the z-scores to create the composite social cognition score.
Theory of Mind Assessment (High Level Social Cognition)
Time frame · Visit 2 (baseline), Visit 3 (1 week following, post-treatment)
The Awareness of Social Inference Test (TASIT Part III: Social Inference - Enriched) will be administered to assess theory of mind.
Empathy
Time frame · Visit 2 (baseline), Visit 3 (1 week following, post-treatment)
Empathy was assessed using the Emotional Perspective Taking Task (EPTT) (Derntl et al., 2009). In this task, subjects are presented with 60 digital images depicting two individuals in a social interaction, with one individual's face masked. Subjects are asked to infer the emotional expression of the masked face, selecting between two choices. Scenes portray 5 basic emotions as well as neutrality and each image is displayed for 4 s each.
Social Perception Assessment (Low Level Social Cognition)
Time frame · Visit 2 (baseline), Visit 3 (1 week following, post-treatment)
We will assess social perception using the Half-Profile of Nonverbal Sensitivity (Half-PONS). Brief scenes are shown that include facial expressions, voice intonations, and/or body gestures. Subjects select a label that best describes the situation. The dependent measure is the total number of correct labels.
Facial Affect Recognition (Low Level Social Cognition)
Time frame · Visit 2 (baseline), Visit 3 (1 week following, post-treatment)
Participants are asked to identify facial expressions of emotion in still photographs from the standardized stimulus set developed by Ekman. The test includes digitized color photos of eight different posers displaying facial expressions of six basic emotions plus neutral expressions. On each trial, a photo and a list of the seven possible expressions are simultaneously presented on the screen. The participant verbally identifies the emotion he/she believes is correct and the experimenter enters the response. The dependent measure is the total number correct.
Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia Total Score
Time frame · Visit 2 (baseline), Visit 3 (1 week following, post-treatment)
This is a frequently used instrument, initially developed by Kay, Opler, and Fiszbein, that assesses 30 different symptoms (categorized into positive, negative, and general psychopathology) on a scale from 1 to 7, based on clinical interview. It will be used to compare the psychopathology between the two treatment groups. The maximum Total Score on the scale is 210 and the minimum score is 30, with higher values indicating more severe symptoms. The maximum scale of 210 is the sum of the scores from each symptom category (positive symptoms = range 7 to 49; negative symptoms = range 7 to 49; general psychopathology = range to 16 to 112). Our outcome measure refers to the change in the PANSS Total Score. A greater decrease on the scale indicates greater improvement in symptoms (e.g., a participant with a change score of -20 improved more on the PANSS than a participant with a change score of -5).
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Change in z-score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inactive Nasal Spray | 0.10 | 0.35 |
| Intranasal Oxytocin | 0.23 | 0.36 |
| Group | Value (Change in z-score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inactive Nasal Spray | -0.01 | 0.47 |
| Intranasal Oxytocin | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Group | Value (Change in z-score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inactive Nasal Spray | 0.24 | 0.63 |
| Intranasal Oxytocin | 0.61 | 0.76 |
| Group | Value (Change in z-score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inactive Nasal Spray | 0.15 | 0.77 |
| Intranasal Oxytocin | 0 | 0.73 |
| Group | Value (Change in z-score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inactive Nasal Spray | 0.05 | 0.67 |
| Intranasal Oxytocin | 0.22 | 0.45 |
| Group | Value (change in units on scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Inactive Nasal Spray | -10.83 | 5.37 |
| Intranasal Oxytocin | -8.89 | 6.19 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Inactive Nasal SprayA placebo nasal spray will be prepared to be otherwise identical to the active treatment nasal spray except lacking oxytocin. The ingredients in the inactive nasal spray are mannitol, glycerin, and preserved water. Inactive placebo nasal spray: A placebo nasal spray will be prepared identically to the oxytocin nasal spray except lacking oxytocin. Its ingredients are mannitol, glycerin, and preserved water. It will be administered at 5 sprays to each nostril, one time. | – | 0 / 12 | 2 / 12 |
| Intranasal OxytocinOxytocin nasal spray (40 units/ml) will be administered in a single intranasal dose of 40 IU. Its formula is: oxytocin 1 unit/mg mannitol trituration 0.2Gm + glycerin USP 0.1ml + preserved water 5ml. Oxytocin: Oxytocin 40 units/ml nasal spray: use 5 sprays per nostril (40 IU total) one time | – | 0 / 11 | 2 / 11 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
7 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013
Davis et al. 2013Schizophrenia researchcited by 95
PMID 23676253DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2013.04.023PUB-23676253
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2010
Feifel et al. 2010Biological psychiatrycited by 243
PMID 20615494DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.04.039PUB-20615494
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2009
Shamay-Tsoory et al. 2009Biological psychiatrycited by 326
PMID 19640508DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.06.009PUB-19640508
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2008
Guastella et al. 2008Biological psychiatrycited by 538
PMID 17888410DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.026PUB-17888410
Indexing hint: Observational study · 2008
Goldman et al. 2008Schizophrenia researchcited by 159
PMID 17961988PMC2277481DOI 10.1016/j.schres.2007.09.019PUB-17961988
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2007
Domes et al. 2007Biological psychiatrycited by 826
PMID 17137561DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.07.015PUB-17137561
Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2005
Kosfeld et al. 2005Naturecited by 1,701
PMID 15931222DOI 10.1038/nature03701PUB-15931222
2 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2010
Bartz et al. 2010Psychological sciencecited by 281
PMID 20855907PMC6634294DOI 10.1177/0956797610383439PUB-20855907
PubMed tag: none · 2009
Kéri et al. 2009Social neurosciencecited by 120
PMID 18671168DOI 10.1080/17470910802319710PUB-18671168
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated