Beta-cell Function After 52 Weeks of Therapy
| Group | Value (ratio) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | 2.89 | 0.27 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | 1.15 | 0.11 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataFinland, Netherlands, Sweden
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Effects of Exenatide and Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00097500Sept 2004 to Dec 2009
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This Phase 3, open-label, multicenter study is designed to compare the effects of exenatide and insulin glargine (Lantus® injection) on beta-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using metformin.
Experimental
Exenatide Arm
Exenatide and Metformin
Active comparator
Insulin Glargine Arm
Insulin Glargine and Metformin
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Beta-cell Function After 52 Weeks of Therapy
Time frame · Baseline (week -2) and 52 weeks
Treatment effect on beta-cell function as measured by the ratio of Week 52 arginine-stimulated insulin secretion during a hyperglycemic clamp(specifically, the incremental AUC of insulin with respect to basal value over a 10 min period \[i.e., clamp time 290 min to 300 min\]) to that at baseline (i.e., the ratio is calculated as arginine-stimulated insulin secretion at week 52 divided by arginine-stimulated insulin secretion at baseline \[week -2\]).
Beta-cell Function 4 Weeks After Cessation of Therapy
Time frame · Baseline (week -2) and 56 weeks
Treatment effect on beta-cell function as measured by the ratio of Week 56 arginine-stimulated insulin secretion during a hyperglycemic clamp(specifically, the incremental AUC of insulin with respect to basal value over a 10 min period \[i.e., clamp time 290 min to 300 min\]) to that at baseline (i.e., the ratio is calculated as arginine-stimulated insulin secretion at week 56 divided by arginine-stimulated insulin secretion at baseline \[week -2\]).
Change in First Phase C-peptide Release
Time frame · baseline (week -2), 52 weeks, and 56 weeks
Ratio of first phase C-peptide response to glucose at 52 weeks (end of on-drug period) and 56 weeks (during off-drug period) compared to first phase C-peptide response to glucose at baseline (i.e., C-peptide response to glucose at week 52 or week 56 divided by C-peptide response to glucose at baseline \[week -2\]). C-peptide is measured as a surrogate marker of insulin secretion. First phase C-peptide/insulin release is measured during the first ten minutes of glucose infusion during a hyperglycemic clamp procedure.
Change in Second Phase C-peptide Release
Time frame · baseline (-2 weeks), 52 weeks, and 56 weeks
Ratio of second phase C-peptide response to glucose at 52 weeks (end of on-drug period) and 56 weeks (during off-drug period) compared to second phase C-peptide response to glucose at baseline (i.e., C-peptide response to glucose at week 52 or week 56 divided by C-peptide response to glucose at baseline \[week -2\]). C-peptide is measured as a surrogate marker of insulin secretion. Second phase C-peptide/insulin release is measured from time=10 minutes to time=80 minutes of glucose infusion during a hyperglycemic clamp procedure.
Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time frame · Week 0 and week 52
Change in HbA1c from week 0 to week 52 (i.e., HbA1c at week 52 minus HbA1c at week 0).
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose
Time frame · 0 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in fasting plasma glucose from week 0 to week 52 (i.e., fasting plasma glucose at week 52 minus fasting plasma glucose at week 0).
Seven Point Self Monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Measurements
Time frame · 0 weeks and 52 weeks
SMBG measured at 7 time points (before and after breakfast, before and after lunch, before and after dinner, at bedtime).
Change in Body Weight
Time frame · 0 weeks and 52 weeks
Change in body weight from week 0 to week 52 (i.e., body weight at week 52 minus body weight at week 0).
M-value at Baseline, Week 52 and Week 56
Time frame · baseline (week -2), 52 weeks, and 56 weeks
M-value at baseline (week -2), week 52 (end of on-drug period), and week 56 (during off-drug period). Insulin sensitivity was assessed during the euglycemic/hyperglycemic clamp test at baseline (week -2), week 52, and week 56. Insulin-mediated glucose uptake (M-value) was calculated as the mean glucose requirement during the 90-120 minute interval of the clamp.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (ratio) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | 2.89 | 0.27 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | 1.15 | 0.11 |
| Group | Value (ratio) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | 1.02 | 0.06 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | 1.08 | 0.07 |
| Group | Value (ratio) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | 1.72 | 0.11 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | 1.13 | 0.07 |
| Group | Value (ratio) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | 2.88 | 0.18 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | 1.01 | 0.07 |
| Group | Value (percent) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | -0.97 | 0.14 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | -0.87 | 0.15 |
| Group | Value (mmol/L) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | -1.53 | 0.25 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | -3.10 | 0.27 |
| Group | Value (mmol/L) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | 8.92 | 1.80 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | 8.38 | 1.91 |
| Group | Value (kg) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm | -3.80 | 0.87 |
| Insulin Glargine Arm | 0.75 | 0.95 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exenatide Arm5 mcg twice a day for 4 weeks, followed by 10 mcg twice a day for 8 weeks. After 12 weeks, exenatide is titrated (up to a maximum of 20 mcg three times a day) based on periodic glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurements and tolerability. | – | 3 / 36 | 32 / 36 |
| Insulin Glargine ArmDosing starts at 10 IU/day, and is then titrated, based on daily fasting blood glucose measurements. | – | 1 / 33 | 31 / 33 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
5 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2025
Natale et al. 2025The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 8
PMID 39963952PMC11834151DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015849.pub2PUB-39963952
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2019
Muskiet et al. 2019Diabetes research and clinical practicecited by 17
PMID 31078666DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.05.001PUB-31078666
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2011
Bunck et al. 2011Diabetes carecited by 204
PMID 21868779PMC3161303DOI 10.2337/dc11-0291PUB-21868779
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2010
Bunck et al. 2010Atherosclerosiscited by 114
PMID 20494360DOI 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.04.024PUB-20494360
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2009
Bunck et al. 2009Diabetes carecited by 302
PMID 19196887PMC2671094DOI 10.2337/dc08-1797PUB-19196887
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated