Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 36 · 2011

4 results

Effects of exenatide on measures of β-cell function after 3 years in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes.

Bunck MC, Cornér A, Eliasson B, Heine RJ, Shaginian RM, Taskinen MR, Smith U, Yki-Järvinen H, Diamant M

Diabetes care1 Sept 2011Cited by 204 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study4

4 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide and insulin glargine produced similar glycemic control after 3 years.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes taking metformin, exenatide and insulin glargine produced similar glucose control.

    Outcome
    No significant changeGlycemic control
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 yearsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Glycemic control
    6.6%
    exenatide
    Glycemic control
    6.9%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At 3 years, EXE and GLAR resulted in similar levels of glycemic control: 6.6 ± 0.2% and 6.9 ± 0.2%, respectively (P = 0.186).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Sixty-nine metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to EXE or GLAR.
    Summary · context
    Thirty-six completed (EXE: n = 16; GLAR: n = 20) the 3-year exposure period.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide reduced body weight more than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes taking metformin, exenatide reduced weight more than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    DecreaseBody weight
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 yearsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Body weight difference
    −7.9 kg
    exenatide versus insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    EXE compared with GLAR significantly reduced body weight (-7.9 ± 1.8 kg; P < 0.001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Sixty-nine metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to EXE or GLAR.
    Summary · context
    Thirty-six completed (EXE: n = 16; GLAR: n = 20) the 3-year exposure period.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, disposition index increased after exenatide but decreased after insulin glargine following the off-drug period.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, the disposition index increased after exenatide but decreased after insulin glargine following treatment withdrawal.

    Outcome
    IncreaseDisposition index
    Study

    n = 36

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 yearsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Disposition index change
    1.43 not stated
    exenatide
    Disposition index change
    −0.99 not stated
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Following the 4-week off-drug period, the DI, compared with pretreatment, increased with EXE, but decreased with GLAR (1.43 ± 0.78 and -0.99 ± 0.65, respectively; P = 0.028).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Sixty-nine metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to EXE or GLAR.
    Summary · context
    Thirty-six completed (EXE: n = 16; GLAR: n = 20) the 3-year exposure period.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with type 2 diabetes, exenatide increased the M value after the off-drug period.

    In plain wordsIn patients with diabetes, insulin sensitivity increased from pretreatment after exenatide and a four-week period without treatment.

    Outcome
    IncreaseInsulin sensitivity M value
    Study

    n = 16

    Comparator
    Pretreatment
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 3 yearsAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    M value increase
    39%
    after 4-week off-drug period

    Source sentences

    Summary
    After the 4-week off-drug period, EXE increased the M value by 39% (P = 0.006) while GLAR had no effect (P = 0.647).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Sixty-nine metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to EXE or GLAR.
    Summary · context
    Thirty-six completed (EXE: n = 16; GLAR: n = 20) the 3-year exposure period.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT00097500

Effects of Exenatide and Insulin Glargine in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

AstraZenecan = 69Sept 2004 to Dec 2009

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.