Skip to content

Trial · Observational

RecruitingPhase not statedRegistry data

The Cardiovascular Effect of GLP-1 Agonist, SGLT2 Inhibitor and Their Combination

This trial does not test a peptide that PepBank tracks.

  • Measures MOTS-c, does not give it. It appears in an outcome measure.
  • Names Liraglutide, does not test it. It appears in the description.

Overview

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Phase not stated
Enrollment
240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor
University of Athens · Other
Design
Not stated
Countries
1 country

Greece

Start
3 Nov 2017
Primary completion
31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Completion
30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
First posted
18 Mar 2019
Last update posted
13 Mar 2026
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Timeline

1 trial · 1 ongoing

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201820202022202420262028
  1. Ph –

    The Cardiovascular Effect of GLP-1 Agonist, SGLT2 Inhibitor and Their Combination

    NCT03878706

    3 Nov 2017 to est. 30 Jun 2027

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

A. Four groups of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with high or very high cardiovascular risk or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) will be studied before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment: * 60 patients treated with a combination of GLP1 analogue and SGLT2 inhibitor ± metformin * 60 patients treated with GLP-1 agonist as a second step after metformin * 60 patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitor as a second step after metformin * 60 patients treated with a combination of insulin and other antidiabetic agents (metformin - DPP4 inhibitors) Individuals will be equal distributed as far as age, gender and body mass index concerned. In addition, patients suffered from kidney disease and retinopathy are excluded.

Arms4

  • Other

    GLP1 and SGLT2i group

    60 patients treated with a combination of liraglutide and empagliflozin. All subjects will undergo an echocardiographic study to estimate GLS, left ventricular twisting-untwisting using speckle tracking imaging and carotid intima-media thickness. PWV, AIx, SBPao and PPao with Arteriograph, Mobilograph and Complior, and perfused boundary region (PBR) of sublingual vessels using Sideview Darkfield Imaging (Microscan, Glycockeck). PBR consists the cell-free space which is formed from the separation of red blood cells from plasma at the surface of the endothelial glycocalyx. Oxidative stress markers, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, thrombomodulin, nitrites and nitrates, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, mitochondrial-derived peptide-c (MOTS-c), blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and lipid profile will be measured before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment.

  • Other

    GLP1 group

    60 patients treated with liraglutide. All subjects will undergo an echocardiographic study in order to estimate GLS, left ventricular twisting-untwisting using speckle tracking imaging and carotid intima-media thickness. PWV, AIx, SBPao and PPao with Arteriograph, Mobilograph and Complior, and perfused boundary region (PBR) of sublingual vessels using Sideview Darkfield Imaging (Microscan, Glycockeck). PBR consists the cell-free space which is formed from the separation of red blood cells from plasma at the surface of the endothelial glycocalyx. Oxidative stress markers, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, thrombomodulin, nitrites and nitrates, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, mitochondrial-derived peptide-c (MOTS-c), blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and a full lipidemic profile will be measured before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment.

  • Other

    SGLT2i group

    60 patients treated with empagliflozin. All subjects will undergo an echocardiographic study in order to estimate GLS, left ventricular twisting-untwisting using speckle tracking imaging and carotid intima-media thickness. PWV, AIx, SBPao and PPao with Arteriograph, Mobilograph and Complior, and perfused boundary region (PBR) of sublingual vessels using Sideview Darkfield Imaging (Microscan, Glucockeck). PBR consists the cell-free space which is formed from the separation of red blood cells from plasma at the surface of the endothelial glycocalyx. Oxidative stress markers, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, thrombomodulin, nitrites and nitrates, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, mitochondrial-derived peptide-c (MOTS-c), blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and a full lipidemic profile will be measured before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment.

  • Other

    Control group

    60 patients treated with insulin and metformin.All subjects will undergo an echocardiographic study in order to estimate GLS, left ventricular twisting-untwisting using speckle tracking imaging and carotid intima-media thickness. PWV, AIx, SBPao and PPao with Arteriograph, Mobilograph and Complior, and perfused boundary region (PBR) of subglottic vessels using Sideview Darkfield Imaging (Microscan, Glucockeck). PBR consists the cell-free space which is formed from the separation of red blood cells from plasma at the surface of the endothelial glycocalyx. Oxidative stress markers, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, thrombomodulin, nitrites and nitrates, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15, mitochondrial-derived peptide-c (MOTS-c), blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and a full lipidemic profile will be measured before and at 6 and 12 months of treatment.

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) difference among treatment groups.

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) difference among treatment groups, measured by echocardiographic study

Secondary outcomes(15)
  1. Comparison of arterial stiffness markers difference among treatment groups.

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of pulse wave velocity difference among treatment groups

  2. Comparison of wave reflection markers difference among treatment groups

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of central augmentation index (Aix%) difference among treatment groups

  3. Comparison of central aortic blood pressure differences among treatment groups

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of both central systolic and diastolic aortic blood pressure differences among treatment groups

  4. Comparison of endothelial glycocalyx thickness difference among treatment groups

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) difference of sublingual vessels among treatment groups

  5. Comparison of oxidative stress and endothelial function biomarkers differences among treatment groups

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of malondialdehyde, protein carbonyls vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, thrombomodulin, nitrites and nitrates plasma levels differences among treatment groups

  6. Comparison of cardiac biomarkers differences among treatment groups.

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 and mitochondrial-derived peptide-c (MOTS-c) levels differences among treatment groups

  7. Comparison of left ventricular myocardial function difference between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) difference between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

  8. Comparison of arterial stiffness difference between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of pulse wave velocity difference between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

  9. Comparison of endothelial glycocalyx thickness difference between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) difference between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

  10. Comparison of oxidative stress and endothelial function biomarkers differences between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of malondialdehyde, protein carbonyls, vascular cell adhesion molecule (VCAM)-1, intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1, thrombomodulin, nitrites and nitrates plasma levels difference between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

  11. Comparison of cardiac biomarkers differences between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), growth differentiation factor (GDF)-15 and mitochondrial-derived peptide-c (MOTS-c) levels difference between coronary artery disease patients and non-coronary artery disease patients in each study group.

  12. Comparison of liver steatosis level between treatment groups

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) Index for Liver Fibrosis and Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Score between treatment groups

  13. Comparison of carotid atherosclerotic markers between treatment groups

    Time frame · 12 months

    Registry description

    Comparison of carotid intima-media thickness between treatment groups

  14. Comparison of non-fatal cardiovascular events' incidence between the treatment groups

    Time frame · 6 years

    Registry description

    Comaprison of the composite outcome coonsisting of non-fatal Myocardial Infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke or hospitalization for heart failure between the different groups

  15. Comparison of cost analysis for the four treatment groups

    Time frame · 6 years

    Registry description

    Comaprison of the cost of the four treatment group alongside hospitalization expenses

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

No results are posted for this trial.

A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies6

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

3 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Observational study · 2025

17 results

Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors, and Their Combination on Neurohumoral and Mitochondrial Activation in Patients With Diabetes.

Ikonomidis et al. 2025Journal of the American Heart Associationcited by 10

PMID 40008510PMC12132653DOI 10.1161/jaha.124.039129PUB-40008510

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND17 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2020

15 results

Effects of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors, and Their Combination on Endothelial Glycocalyx, Arterial Function, and Myocardial Work Index in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus After 12-Month Treatment.

Ikonomidis et al. 2020Journal of the American Heart Associationcited by 154

PMID 32326806PMC7428590DOI 10.1161/jaha.119.015716PUB-32326806

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND15 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016

8 results

Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.

Marso et al. 2016The New England journal of medicinecited by 5,535

PMID 27295427PMC4985288DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1603827PUB-27295427

Rights unknown8 results

More studies

3 studies on this page

PubMed tag: none · 2026

Myocardial deformation links combined liraglutide-empagliflozin therapy with improved cardiovascular and economic outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a 6-year study.

Thymis et al. 2026European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice

PMID 42226732PMC13222642DOI 10.1093/ehjimp/qyag080PUB-42226732

CC BY
Download PDF

Indexing hint: Review · 2015

User's guide to mechanism of action and clinical use of GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Jr et al. 2015Postgraduate medicinecited by 94

PMID 26371721DOI 10.1080/00325481.2015.1090295PUB-26371721

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Indexing hint: Review · 2014

Effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 on appetite and body weight: focus on the CNS.

van Bloemendaal et al. 2014The Journal of endocrinologycited by 245

PMID 24323912DOI 10.1530/joe-13-0414PUB-24323912

Rights unknown
Source link

Other registry references

References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.

  • ResultHandelsman Y, Bloomgarden ZT, Grunberger G, Umpierrez G, Zimmerman RS, Bailey TS, Blonde L, Bray GA, Cohen AJ, Dagogo-Jack S, Davidson JA, Einhorn D, Ganda OP, Garber AJ, Garvey WT, Henry RR, Hirsch IB, Horton ES, Hurley DL, Jellinger PS, Jovanovic L, Lebovitz HE, LeRoith D, Levy P, McGill JB, Mechanick JI, Mestman JH, Moghissi ES, Orzeck EA, Pessah-Pollack R, Rosenblit PD, Vinik AI, Wyne K, Zangeneh F. American association of clinical endocrinologists and american college of endocrinology - clinical practice guidelines for developing a diabetes mellitus comprehensive care plan - 2015. Endocr Pract. 2015 Apr;21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-87. doi: 10.4158/EP15672.GL. No abstract available. PMID 25869408
  • ResultAmerican Diabetes Association. 7. Approaches to Glycemic Treatment. Diabetes Care. 2016 Jan;39 Suppl 1:S52-9. doi: 10.2337/dc16-S010. No abstract available. PMID 26696682
  • ResultJabbour SA, Hardy E, Sugg J, Parikh S; Study 10 Group. Dapagliflozin is effective as add-on therapy to sitagliptin with or without metformin: a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(3):740-50. doi: 10.2337/dc13-0467. Epub 2013 Oct 21. PMID 24144654
  • ResultNauck MA, Kemmeries G, Holst JJ, Meier JJ. Rapid tachyphylaxis of the glucagon-like peptide 1-induced deceleration of gastric emptying in humans. Diabetes. 2011 May;60(5):1561-5. doi: 10.2337/db10-0474. Epub 2011 Mar 23. PMID 21430088
  • ResultWanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, von Eynatten M, Mattheus M, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Zinman B; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin and Progression of Kidney Disease in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jul 28;375(4):323-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515920. Epub 2016 Jun 14. PMID 27299675
  • ResultFerrannini G, Hach T, Crowe S, Sanghvi A, Hall KD, Ferrannini E. Energy Balance After Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibition. Diabetes Care. 2015 Sep;38(9):1730-5. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0355. Epub 2015 Jul 15. PMID 26180105
  • ResultZinman B, Wanner C, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, Bluhmki E, Hantel S, Mattheus M, Devins T, Johansen OE, Woerle HJ, Broedl UC, Inzucchi SE; EMPA-REG OUTCOME Investigators. Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2117-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1504720. Epub 2015 Sep 17. PMID 26378978
  • ResultChae CU, Pfeffer MA, Glynn RJ, Mitchell GF, Taylor JO, Hennekens CH. Increased pulse pressure and risk of heart failure in the elderly. JAMA. 1999 Feb 17;281(7):634-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.7.634. PMID 10029125
  • ResultFranklin SS, Khan SA, Wong ND, Larson MG, Levy D. Is pulse pressure useful in predicting risk for coronary heart Disease? The Framingham heart study. Circulation. 1999 Jul 27;100(4):354-60. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.100.4.354. PMID 10421594
  • ResultDomanski M, Norman J, Wolz M, Mitchell G, Pfeffer M. Cardiovascular risk assessment using pulse pressure in the first national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES I). Hypertension. 2001 Oct;38(4):793-7. doi: 10.1161/hy1001.092966. PMID 11641288
  • ResultLaurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, Ducimetiere P, Benetos A. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001 May;37(5):1236-41. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.5.1236. PMID 11358934
  • ResultMeaume S, Benetos A, Henry OF, Rudnichi A, Safar ME. Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts cardiovascular mortality in subjects >70 years of age. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2001 Dec;21(12):2046-50. doi: 10.1161/hq1201.100226. PMID 11742883
  • ResultAvolio AP, Deng FQ, Li WQ, Luo YF, Huang ZD, Xing LF, O'Rourke MF. Effects of aging on arterial distensibility in populations with high and low prevalence of hypertension: comparison between urban and rural communities in China. Circulation. 1985 Feb;71(2):202-10. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.71.2.202. PMID 3965165
  • ResultVaitkevicius PV, Fleg JL, Engel JH, O'Connor FC, Wright JG, Lakatta LE, Yin FC, Lakatta EG. Effects of age and aerobic capacity on arterial stiffness in healthy adults. Circulation. 1993 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):1456-62. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.88.4.1456. PMID 8403292
  • ResultIkonomidis I, Lekakis J, Papadopoulos C, Triantafyllidi H, Paraskevaidis I, Georgoula G, Tzortzis S, Revela I, Kremastinos DT. Incremental value of pulse wave velocity in the determination of coronary microcirculatory dysfunction in never-treated patients with essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2008 Jul;21(7):806-13. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.172. Epub 2008 May 22. PMID 18497732
  • ResultTzortzis S, Ikonomidis I, Lekakis J, Papadopoulos C, Triantafyllidi H, Parissis J, Trivilou P, Paraskevaidis I, Anastasiou-Nana M, Kremastinos DT. Incremental predictive value of carotid intima-media thickness to arterial stiffness for impaired coronary flow reserve in untreated hypertensives. Hypertens Res. 2010 Apr;33(4):367-73. doi: 10.1038/hr.2010.2. Epub 2010 Feb 5. PMID 20139923

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 45 Years up to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Subject has type 2 diabetes mellitus * Subject has high or very high cardiovascular risk * Subject has heart failure with preserved ejection fraction Exclusion Criteria: * Subject has type 1 diabetes mellitus * Subject has kidney disease * Subject has retinopathy

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.