Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
| Group | Value (percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -1.45 | 0.09 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -1.85 | 0.09 |
| Placebo | -0.09 | 0.09 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name SUSTAIN™ 5
United States, Germany, Japan, Puerto Rico, Serbia, Slovakia
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and the United States of America (USA). The aim of the trial is to investigate efficacy and safety of semaglutide once weekly versus placebo as add-on to basal insulin alone or basal insulin in combination with metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Experimental
Semaglutide 0.5 mg/Week
Experimental
Semaglutide 1.0 mg/Week
Placebo comparator
Semaglutide Placebo 0.5 mg/Week
Placebo comparator
Semaglutide Placebo 1.0 mg/Week
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements.
Change in Body Weight
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Estimated mean change from baseline in body weight at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame · week 0, week 30
Estimated mean change from baseline in FPG at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements.
Change in Insulin Dose
Time frame · week 0, week 30
Estimated mean change from baseline in insulin dose at week 30 was measured in terms of ratio to baseline. Responses at week 30 are analysed using an Analysis of covariance model with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward.
Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time frame · week 0, week 30
Estimated mean change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements.
Patient Reported Outcomes, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)
Time frame · week 0, week 30
The DTSQs questionnaire was used to assess subjects' treatment satisfaction and contained 8 components and evaluates the diabetes treatment (including insulin, tablets and/or diet) in terms of convenience, flexibility and general feelings towards the treatment. The result presented is the 'Treatment Satisfaction' summary score, which is the sum of 6 of the 8 items of the DTSQs questionnaire. Response options range from 6 (best case) to 0 (worst case). Total scores for treatment satisfaction range from 0-36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. The post-baseline responses are analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, country and stratification variables (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] and use of metformin \[yes or no\]) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward.
HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target
Time frame · After 30 weeks treatment
Percentage of subjects with HbA1C below 7.0% after 30 weeks treatment. Missing data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.
HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target
Time frame · After 30 weeks treatment
Percentage of participants with HbA1c below or equal to 6.5% after 30 weeks treatment. Missing data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -1.45 | 0.09 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -1.85 | 0.09 |
| Placebo | -0.09 | 0.09 |
| Group | Value (kg) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -3.67 | 0.36 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -6.42 | 0.36 |
| Placebo | -1.36 | 0.37 |
| Group | Value (mg/dL) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -29.14 | 3.74 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -42.38 | 3.76 |
| Placebo | -8.51 | 4.02 |
| Group | Value (ratio) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | 0.90 | 0.01 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | 0.85 | 0.01 |
| Placebo | 0.96 | 0.01 |
| Group | Value (mm Hg) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -1.84 | 0.73 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -1.50 | 0.74 |
| Placebo | -2.17 | 0.79 |
| Group | Value (scores on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | 2.73 | 0.46 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | 3.47 | 0.46 |
| Placebo | 1.25 | 0.50 |
| Group | Value (percentage of subjects) |
|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | 60.6 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | 78.6 |
| Placebo | 10.5 |
| Group | Value (percentage of subjects) |
|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | 40.9 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | 61.1 |
| Placebo | 4.5 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mgSubjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. | – | 8 / 132 | 52 / 132 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mgSubjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly for next 4 weeks and then semaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. | – | 12 / 131 | 54 / 131 |
| PlaceboSubjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial. | – | 9 / 133 | 34 / 133 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
6 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2020
DeSouza et al. 2020The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismcited by 43
PMID 31769496DOI 10.1210/clinem/dgz072PUB-31769496
PubMed tag: none · 2019
Rodbard et al. 2019Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologistscited by 17
PMID 30865526DOI 10.4158/ep-2018-0444PUB-30865526
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2019
Jendle et al. 2019Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 17
PMID 31215727PMC6771774DOI 10.1111/dom.13816PUB-31215727
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018
Warren et al. 2018Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 54
PMID 29687620PMC6099273DOI 10.1111/dom.13331PUB-29687620
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018
Rodbard et al. 2018The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismcited by 315
PMID 29688502PMC5991220DOI 10.1210/jc.2018-00070PUB-29688502
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018
Ahrén et al. 2018Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 122
PMID 29766634PMC6099440DOI 10.1111/dom.13353PUB-29766634
4 studies on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2020
Husain et al. 2020Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 154
PMID 31903692PMC7064975DOI 10.1111/dom.13955PUB-31903692
PubMed tag: none · 2020
Husain et al. 2020Cardiovascular diabetologycited by 33
PMID 32998732PMC7526237DOI 10.1186/s12933-020-01106-4PUB-32998732
Indexing hint: Review · 2019
Aroda et al. 2019Diabetes & metabolismcited by 227
PMID 30615985DOI 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.12.001PUB-30615985
PubMed tag: none · 2018
DeVries et al. 2018Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 19
PMID 29862621PMC6175309DOI 10.1111/dom.13396PUB-29862621
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated