Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry data

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Placebo as add-on to Basal Insulin Alone or Basal Insulin in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Short name SUSTAIN™ 5

NCTNCT02305381 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other idNN9535-3627Other id2013-004502-26Other idU1111-1149-3738Other idJapicCTI-142729

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
397 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S · Industry
Design
Randomized · Double masking
Countries
6 countries

United States, Germany, Japan, Puerto Rico, Serbia, Slovakia

Start
1 Dec 2014
Primary completion
21 Nov 2015
Completion
21 Nov 2015
First posted
2 Dec 2014 (estimated)
Last update posted
11 Jun 2019
Conditions
Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201420152016
  1. Ph 3

    SUSTAIN™ 5

    NCT02305381

    1 Dec 2014 to 21 Nov 2015

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

This trial is conducted in Asia, Europe and the United States of America (USA). The aim of the trial is to investigate efficacy and safety of semaglutide once weekly versus placebo as add-on to basal insulin alone or basal insulin in combination with metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes.

Interventions

  • semaglutideDrug
  • placeboDrug

Arms4

  • Experimental

    Semaglutide 0.5 mg/Week

  • Experimental

    Semaglutide 1.0 mg/Week

  • Placebo comparator

    Semaglutide Placebo 0.5 mg/Week

  • Placebo comparator

    Semaglutide Placebo 1.0 mg/Week

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

    Time frame · Week 0, week 30

    Registry description

    Estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements.

Secondary outcomes(7)
  1. Change in Body Weight

    Time frame · Week 0, week 30

    Registry description

    Estimated mean change from baseline in body weight at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements.

  2. Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

    Time frame · week 0, week 30

    Registry description

    Estimated mean change from baseline in FPG at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements.

  3. Change in Insulin Dose

    Time frame · week 0, week 30

    Registry description

    Estimated mean change from baseline in insulin dose at week 30 was measured in terms of ratio to baseline. Responses at week 30 are analysed using an Analysis of covariance model with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward.

  4. Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Time frame · week 0, week 30

    Registry description

    Estimated mean change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure at week 30. The post-baseline responses are analysed using a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using mixed model for repeated measurements.

  5. Patient Reported Outcomes, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)

    Time frame · week 0, week 30

    Registry description

    The DTSQs questionnaire was used to assess subjects' treatment satisfaction and contained 8 components and evaluates the diabetes treatment (including insulin, tablets and/or diet) in terms of convenience, flexibility and general feelings towards the treatment. The result presented is the 'Treatment Satisfaction' summary score, which is the sum of 6 of the 8 items of the DTSQs questionnaire. Response options range from 6 (best case) to 0 (worst case). Total scores for treatment satisfaction range from 0-36. Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction. The post-baseline responses are analysed using an ANCOVA model with treatment, country and stratification variables (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] and use of metformin \[yes or no\]) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate. Mean estimates are adjusted according to observed baseline distribution. Missing data was imputed using last observation carried forward.

  6. HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target

    Time frame · After 30 weeks treatment

    Registry description

    Percentage of subjects with HbA1C below 7.0% after 30 weeks treatment. Missing data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

  7. HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target

    Time frame · After 30 weeks treatment

    Registry description

    Percentage of participants with HbA1c below or equal to 6.5% after 30 weeks treatment. Missing data imputed from a mixed model for repeated measurements with treatment, country and stratification variable (HbA1c level at screening \[\<= 8.0% or \> 8.0%\] crossed with use of metformin \[yes or no\]; 2 by 2 levels) as fixed factors and baseline value as covariate, all nested within visit.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeLeast squares mean· Week 0, week 30

Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)

GroupValue (percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin)Spread
Semaglutide 0.5 mg-1.450.09
Semaglutide 1.0 mg-1.850.09
Placebo-0.090.09
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Week 0, week 30

Change in Body Weight

GroupValue (kg)Spread
Semaglutide 0.5 mg-3.670.36
Semaglutide 1.0 mg-6.420.36
Placebo-1.360.37
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· week 0, week 30

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

GroupValue (mg/dL)Spread
Semaglutide 0.5 mg-29.143.74
Semaglutide 1.0 mg-42.383.76
Placebo-8.514.02
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· week 0, week 30

Change in Insulin Dose

GroupValue (ratio)Spread
Semaglutide 0.5 mg0.900.01
Semaglutide 1.0 mg0.850.01
Placebo0.960.01
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· week 0, week 30

Change in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure

GroupValue (mm Hg)Spread
Semaglutide 0.5 mg-1.840.73
Semaglutide 1.0 mg-1.500.74
Placebo-2.170.79
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· week 0, week 30

Patient Reported Outcomes, Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ)

GroupValue (scores on a scale)Spread
Semaglutide 0.5 mg2.730.46
Semaglutide 1.0 mg3.470.46
Placebo1.250.50
Secondary outcomeNumber· After 30 weeks treatment

HbA1c Below 7.0% (53 mmol/Mol) American Diabetes Association (ADA) Target

GroupValue (percentage of subjects)
Semaglutide 0.5 mg60.6
Semaglutide 1.0 mg78.6
Placebo10.5
Secondary outcomeNumber· After 30 weeks treatment

HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) Target

GroupValue (percentage of subjects)
Semaglutide 0.5 mg40.9
Semaglutide 1.0 mg61.1
Placebo4.5

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Semaglutide 0.5 mgSubjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial.–8 / 13252 / 132
Semaglutide 1.0 mgSubjects received semaglutide 0.25 mg sc injection once weekly for 4 weeks followed by semaglutide 0.5 mg once weekly for next 4 weeks and then semaglutide 1.0 mg once weekly up to week 30. Semaglutide injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial.–12 / 13154 / 131
PlaceboSubjects received placebo (matched to semaglutide) sc injection once weekly for 30 weeks. Placebo injection was administered in the thigh, abdomen or upper arm, at any time of day irrespective of meals. The injections were to be administered on the same day of the week during the trial.–9 / 13334 / 133

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies10

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

6 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2020

9 results

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide for Type 2 Diabetes by Race and Ethnicity: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SUSTAIN Trials.

DeSouza et al. 2020The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismcited by 43

PMID 31769496DOI 10.1210/clinem/dgz072PUB-31769496

Rights unknown9 results

PubMed tag: none · 2019

8 results

GREATER COMBINED REDUCTIONS IN HbA1C ≥1.0% AND WEIGHT ≥5.0% WITH SEMAGLUTIDE VERSUS COMPARATORS IN TYPE 2 DIABETES.

Rodbard et al. 2019Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologistscited by 17

PMID 30865526DOI 10.4158/ep-2018-0444PUB-30865526

Full text at the publisher8 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2019

6 results

Improved treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly semaglutide in the SUSTAIN trials.

Jendle et al. 2019Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 17

PMID 31215727PMC6771774DOI 10.1111/dom.13816PUB-31215727

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC6 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018

6 results

Semaglutide as a therapeutic option for elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: Pooled analysis of the SUSTAIN 1-5 trials.

Warren et al. 2018Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 54

PMID 29687620PMC6099273DOI 10.1111/dom.13331PUB-29687620

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC6 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018

8 results

Semaglutide Added to Basal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 5): A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Rodbard et al. 2018The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismcited by 315

PMID 29688502PMC5991220DOI 10.1210/jc.2018-00070PUB-29688502

CC BY8 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018

5 results

Semaglutide induces weight loss in subjects with type 2 diabetes regardless of baseline BMI or gastrointestinal adverse events in the SUSTAIN 1 to 5 trials.

Ahrén et al. 2018Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 122

PMID 29766634PMC6099440DOI 10.1111/dom.13353PUB-29766634

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC5 results

More studies

4 studies on this page

PubMed tag: none · 2020

Semaglutide (SUSTAIN and PIONEER) reduces cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes across varying cardiovascular risk.

Husain et al. 2020Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 154

PMID 31903692PMC7064975DOI 10.1111/dom.13955PUB-31903692

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC
Read at source

PubMed tag: none · 2020

Effects of semaglutide on risk of cardiovascular events across a continuum of cardiovascular risk: combined post hoc analysis of the SUSTAIN and PIONEER trials.

Husain et al. 2020Cardiovascular diabetologycited by 33

PMID 32998732PMC7526237DOI 10.1186/s12933-020-01106-4PUB-32998732

CC BY
Download PDF

Indexing hint: Review · 2019

Comparative efficacy, safety, and cardiovascular outcomes with once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes: Insights from the SUSTAIN 1-7 trials.

Aroda et al. 2019Diabetes & metabolismcited by 227

PMID 30615985DOI 10.1016/j.diabet.2018.12.001PUB-30615985

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

PubMed tag: none · 2018

Achieving glycaemic control without weight gain, hypoglycaemia, or gastrointestinal adverse events in type 2 diabetes in the SUSTAIN clinical trial programme.

DeVries et al. 2018Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 19

PMID 29862621PMC6175309DOI 10.1111/dom.13396PUB-29862621

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC
Read at source

Other registry references

References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.

  • ResultRodbard H, Lingvay I, Reed J, de la Rosa R, Rose L, Sugimoto D, Araki E, Chu P-L, Wijayasinghe N, Norwood P. Efficacy and safety of semaglutide once-weekly vs placebo as add-on to basal insulin alone or in combination with metformin in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 5). Diabetologia. 2016; 59: S364-5.

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: - Male or female, age at least 18 years at the time of signing inform consent. For Japan: Male or female, age at least 20 years at the time of signing informed consent - Subjects diagnosed with T2DM (type 2 diabetes mellitus) and on stable diabetes treatment (plus/minus 20 percent change in total daily dose) with basal insulin (minimum of 0.25 IU/kg/day and/or 20 IU/day of: insulin glargine, insulin detemir, insulin degludec and/or NPH insulin) alone or in combination with metformin (minimum of 1500 mg/day or maximal tolerable dose) for 90 days prior to screening - HbA1c (glycosylated haemoglobin) 7.0 - 10.0 percent (53 - 86 mmol/mol) both inclusive Exclusion Criteria: - Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of child-bearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method throughout the trial including the 5 weeks follow-up period (adequate contraceptive measures as required by local regulation or practice). Germany: Only highly effective methods of birth control are accepted (ie one that results in less than 1% per year failure rate when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some intrauterine device), or sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner. Japan: Adequate contraceptive measures are abstinence (not having sex), diaphragm, condom (by the partner), intrauterine device, sponge, spermicide or oral contraceptives - Treatment with any glucose lowering agents other than stated in the inclusion criteria in a period of 90 days before screening. An exception is short-term treatment (7 days or less in total) with bolus insulin in connection with intercurrent illness - Experienced more than 3 episodes of severe hypoglycaemia within 6 months prior to screening, and/or hypoglycaemia unawareness - History of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) - Screening calcitonin value above or equal to 50 ng/L (pg/mL) - Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) or multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome 2 (MEN 2) - Severe renal impairment defined as eGFR (estimated glomerular filtration rate) below 30 mL/min/1.73 m\^2 per Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula (4 variable version) - Acute coronary or cerebrovascular event within 90 days before randomisation - Heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.