Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · 2019

6 results

Improved treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with once-weekly semaglutide in the SUSTAIN trials.

Jendle J, Birkenfeld AL, Polonsky WH, Silver R, Uusinarkaus K, Hansen T, Håkan-Bloch J, Tadayon S, Davies MJ

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism12 Jul 2019Cited by 17 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study6

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, satisfaction improvements were generally greater in patients who reached weight loss and HbA1c targets, often with semaglutide 1.0 mg versus comparator or placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, satisfaction gains were generally larger in people who reached weight and blood sugar targets.

    Outcome
    IncreaseTreatment satisfaction by weight loss and glycaemic target achievement
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Comparators or placebo
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and generally greater in patients who achieved versus did not achieve weight loss and glycaemic targets, often with greater improvements with semaglutide 1.0 mg versus comparator/placebo in both weight loss groups.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted to explore the effects of gastrointestinal adverse events (GI AEs), weight loss (≥5%) or achieving glycaemic (HbA1c < 7%) targets on treatment satisfaction.
    Summary · context
    In SUSTAIN 2-5 and 7, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate patient-perceived treatment satisfaction, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes in SUSTAIN 2-5, treatment satisfaction improved more with semaglutide than with comparators or placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, treatment satisfaction rose more with semaglutide than with placebo or the comparison drugs.

    Outcome
    IncreaseOverall treatment satisfaction, SUSTAIN 2-5
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo or active comparators
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Improvements were significantly greater with semaglutide versus comparators/placebo in SUSTAIN 2-5 (all P < 0.05)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In SUSTAIN 2-5 and 7, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate patient-perceived treatment satisfaction, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes in SUSTAIN 7, improvements in treatment satisfaction were generally similar between semaglutide and dulaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, semaglutide and dulaglutide gave similar gains in treatment satisfaction.

    Outcome
    No significant changeOverall treatment satisfaction, SUSTAIN 7
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In SUSTAIN 7, improvements in overall treatment satisfaction were generally similar between semaglutide and dulaglutide, irrespective of weight loss or glycaemic control.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In SUSTAIN 2-5 and 7, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate patient-perceived treatment satisfaction, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, perceived hyperglycaemia fell more with semaglutide than with all comparators or placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, people on semaglutide felt less high blood sugar than those on comparators or placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreasePerceived hyperglycaemia
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    All comparators or placebo
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Perceived hyperglycaemia was significantly reduced from baseline to end of treatment with semaglutide versus all comparators/placebo (all P < 0.05).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In SUSTAIN 2-5 and 7, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate patient-perceived treatment satisfaction, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, perceived hypoglycaemia did not differ between semaglutide and the comparators or placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, felt low blood sugar did not differ between semaglutide and comparators or placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changePerceived hypoglycaemia
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Comparators or placebo
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No differences between treatments were observed for perceived hypoglycaemia.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In SUSTAIN 2-5 and 7, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate patient-perceived treatment satisfaction, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  1. 06HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In SUSTAIN 7, changes in treatment satisfaction were generally lower in patients with gastrointestinal adverse events at week 16 (semaglutide and dulaglutide pooled) but similar by week 40.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes on semaglutide or dulaglutide, stomach side effects lowered satisfaction gains early, but not by week 40.

    Outcome
    DecreaseTreatment satisfaction in patients with versus without GI adverse events, SUSTAIN 7
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Patients without GI adverse events
    Analysis
    Exploratory
    Outcome group
    Patient-reported outcomes · Metabolic and weight

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In SUSTAIN 7, changes in overall treatment satisfaction score were generally lower in patients with versus without GI AEs at week 16 (except dulaglutide 0.75 mg), but similar by week 40.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    In SUSTAIN 2-5 and 7, the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire was used to evaluate patient-perceived treatment satisfaction, hyperglycaemia and hypoglycaemia.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials5

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

5 trials · 5 completed · 5 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT02648204

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide as add-on to Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes.

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 1,2016 Jan 2016 to 19 May 2017

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 15 Oct 2019
CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT02305381

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Placebo as add-on to Basal Insulin Alone or Basal Insulin in Combination With Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 3971 Dec 2014 to 21 Nov 2015

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 11 Jun 2019
CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT02128932

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once Weekly Versus Insulin Glargine Once Daily as add-on to Metformin With or Without Sulphonylurea in Insulin-naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 1,0894 Aug 2014 to 3 Sept 2015

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 13 Jun 2019
CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT01885208

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Exenatide ER 2.0 mg Once-weekly as add-on to 1-2 Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OADs) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 8132 Dec 2013 to 13 Jul 2015

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 13 Jun 2019
CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT01930188

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide Once-weekly Versus Sitagliptin Once-daily as add-on to Metformin and/or TZD in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 1,2312 Dec 2013 to 12 Oct 2015

Diabetes · Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 13 Jun 2019

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  2. Version 2

    11 Oct 2026, 00:50 UTC

    Study results updated

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.