Primary Efficacy Outcome MACE Events
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 905 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 839 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataUnited States, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Czechia, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Philippines, Poland, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, South Africa, South Korea
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering Trial (EXSCEL): A Trial To Evaluate Cardiovascular Outcomes After Treatment With Exenatide Once Weekly In Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
NCT0114433818 Jun 2010 to 24 Apr 2017
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This study will compare the impact of including exenatide once weekly in addition to usual care vs. usual care without exenatide on major cardiovascular outcomes as measured by the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular-related death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or nonfatal stroke.
Experimental
Exenatide Once Weekly
Placebo comparator
Placebo
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Primary Efficacy Outcome MACE Events
Time frame · Time to first event. Information collected during study period (anticipated to be up to 7.5 years).
The primary efficacy outcome variable is defined as the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke. The number of participants who had an event is reported in the results. The primary efficacy endpoint is the same as the primary safety endpoint, and the statistical analysis tests the superiority of exenatide against the placebo.
Primary Safety Outcome MACE Events
Time frame · Time to first event. Information collected during study period (anticipated to be up to 7.5 years).
The primary safety outcome variable is defined as the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke. The number of participants who had an event is reported in the results. The primary safety endpoint is the same as the primary efficacy endpoints, and the statistical analysis tests the non-inferiority of exenatide against placebo.
Secondary Efficacy Outcome All-Cause Mortality
Time frame · Time to first event. Information collected during study period (anticipated to be up to 7.5 years).
The secondary efficacy outcome variable is defined as the all-cause mortality (deaths). The number of participants who had an event is reported in the results.
Secondary Efficacy Outcome CV Death
Time frame · Time to first event. Information collected during study period (anticipated to be up to 7.5 years).
Component of the primary efficacy outcome: cardiovascular death. The number of participants who had an event is reported in the results.
Secondary Efficacy Outcome MI
Time frame · Time to first event. Information collected during study period (anticipated to be up to 7.5 years).
Component of primary efficacy outcome: fatal or non-fatal MI. The number of participants who had an event is reported in the results.
Secondary Efficacy Outcome Stroke
Time frame · Time to first event. Information collected during study period (anticipated to be up to 7.5 years).
Component of primary efficacy outcome: fatal or non-fatal stroke. The number of participants who had an event is reported in the results.
Secondary Efficacy Outcome Hospitalization for ACS
Time frame · Time to first event. Information collected during study period (anticipated to be up to 7.5 years).
The secondary efficacy outcome variable is defined as hospitalization for acute coronary syndrome. The number of participants who had an event is reported in the results.
Secondary Efficacy Outcome Hospitalization for HF
Time frame · Time to first event. Information collected during study period (anticipated to be up to 7.5 years).
The secondary efficacy outcome variable is defined as hospitalization for heart failure. The number of participants who had an event is reported in the results.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 905 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 839 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 905 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 839 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 584 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 507 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 383 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 340 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 493 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 483 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 218 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 187 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 570 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 602 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 231 |
| Exenatide Once Weekly | 219 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| PlaceboMatching placebo subcutaneous injections | 584 / 7372 | 1222 / 7372 | 0 / 0 |
| Exenatide Once WeeklyExenatide 2mg once weekly subcutaneous injections | 507 / 7344 | 1234 / 7344 | 0 / 0 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
8 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2025
Natale et al. 2025The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 8
PMID 39963952PMC11834151DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015849.pub2PUB-39963952
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2022
Davis et al. 2022Cardiovascular diabetologycited by 5
PMID 35761271PMC9238154DOI 10.1186/s12933-022-01555-zPUB-35761271
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2020
Reed et al. 2020Diabetes carecited by 7
PMID 31806653PMC7210004DOI 10.2337/dc19-0950PUB-31806653
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2019
Bethel et al. 2019Diabetes carecited by 31
PMID 31010875PMC6973544DOI 10.2337/dc18-2028PUB-31010875
PubMed tag: none · 2019
Fudim et al. 2019Circulationcited by 81
PMID 31542942PMC6924268DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.119.041659PUB-31542942
PubMed tag: none · 2019
Clegg et al. 2019Cardiovascular diabetologycited by 70
PMID 31640705PMC6805385DOI 10.1186/s12933-019-0942-xPUB-31640705
Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2018
Mentz et al. 2018Journal of the American Heart Associationcited by 26
PMID 30371301PMC6404902DOI 10.1161/jaha.118.009304PUB-30371301
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017
Mentz et al. 2017American heart journalcited by 45
PMID 28454792PMC9849915DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.02.005PUB-28454792
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017
Holman et al. 2017The New England journal of medicinecited by 1,607
PMID 28910237PMC9792409DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1612917PUB-28910237
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
Holman et al. 2016American heart journalcited by 80
PMID 26995376DOI 10.1016/j.ahj.2015.12.009PUB-26995376
3 studies on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2022
Becker et al. 2022Diabetes research and clinical practicecited by 7
PMID 34813910PMC8844554DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.109152PUB-34813910
PubMed tag: none · 2018
Wittbrodt et al. 2018The American journal of managed carecited by 21
PMID 29693361PUB-29693361
Indexing hint: Observational study · 2012
Gaebler et al. 2012Vascular health and risk managementcited by 18
PMID 22566747PMC3346268DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s28744PUB-22566747
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated