In type 2 diabetes, exenatide did not significantly reduce the primary composite cardiovascular outcome versus placebo.
In plain wordsIn type 2 diabetes, exenatide did not significantly reduce the combined cardiovascular outcome compared with placebo.
- Peptide
- Exenatide (exendin-4)
- Outcome
- No significant changePrimary composite cardiovascular outcome superiority
- Study
n = 14,752
- Comparator
- Placebo
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
- Studied dose
- 2 mg once weekly · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Primary composite outcome incidence
- 11.4%
- exenatide group
- Primary composite outcome incidence
- 12.2%
- placebo group
- Hazard ratio
- 0.91 ratio
- exenatide versus placebo (95% CI 0.83 to 1.00)
- P value for superiority
- 0.06 P
- exenatide versus placebo
Source sentences
A primary composite outcome event occurred in 839 of 7356 patients (11.4%; 3.7 events per 100 person-years) in the exenatide group and in 905 of 7396 patients (12.2%; 4.0 events per 100 person-years) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 1.00)
with the intention-to-treat analysis indicating that exenatide, administered once weekly, was noninferior to placebo with respect to safety (P<0.001 for noninferiority) but was not superior to placebo with respect to efficacy (P=0.06 for superiority).
2 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
The primary composite outcome was the first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.
We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes, with or without previous cardiovascular disease, to receive subcutaneous injections of extended-release exenatide at a dose of 2 mg or matching placebo once weekly.