Skip to content

Study · Observational study · 2026

8 results

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist-associated injection site and dermatologic reactions.

Elgindi D, Petronic-Rosic V

Clinics in dermatology3 Sept 2026

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study8

4 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In FAERS, skin and injection-site reactions comprised 33.5% of dulaglutide reports.

    In plain wordsClinical adverse event reports showed skin and injection-site reactions in 33.5% of dulaglutide reports.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSkin and injection-site reporting proportion
    Study

    Homo sapiensn: not reported in source

    FDA Adverse Event Reporting System clinical adverse event reports
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Reporting proportion
    33.5%
    dulaglutide reports

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Exenatide demonstrated the highest proportion of skin and injection-site reports (53.1%), followed by dulaglutide (33.5%), tirzepatide (32.6%), liraglutide (17.1%), semaglutide (12.2%), and lixisenatide (6.9%).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In addition, adverse event reports for tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide were extracted from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Summary · context
    Injection-site events were combined with skin-related adverse events to generate an adjusted skin and injection-site reactions category for comparison across agents.
  2. 02HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In FAERS, skin and injection-site reactions comprised 17.1% of liraglutide reports.

    In plain wordsClinical adverse event reports showed skin and injection-site reactions in 17.1% of liraglutide reports.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSkin and injection-site reporting proportion
    Study

    Homo sapiensn: not reported in source

    FDA Adverse Event Reporting System clinical adverse event reports
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Reporting proportion
    17.1%
    liraglutide reports

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Exenatide demonstrated the highest proportion of skin and injection-site reports (53.1%), followed by dulaglutide (33.5%), tirzepatide (32.6%), liraglutide (17.1%), semaglutide (12.2%), and lixisenatide (6.9%).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In addition, adverse event reports for tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide were extracted from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Summary · context
    Injection-site events were combined with skin-related adverse events to generate an adjusted skin and injection-site reactions category for comparison across agents.
  3. 03HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In FAERS, skin and injection-site reactions comprised 12.2% of semaglutide reports.

    In plain wordsClinical adverse event reports showed skin and injection-site reactions in 12.2% of semaglutide reports.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSkin and injection-site reporting proportion
    Study

    Homo sapiensn: not reported in source

    FDA Adverse Event Reporting System clinical adverse event reports
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Reporting proportion
    12.2%
    semaglutide reports

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Exenatide demonstrated the highest proportion of skin and injection-site reports (53.1%), followed by dulaglutide (33.5%), tirzepatide (32.6%), liraglutide (17.1%), semaglutide (12.2%), and lixisenatide (6.9%).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In addition, adverse event reports for tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide were extracted from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Summary · context
    Injection-site events were combined with skin-related adverse events to generate an adjusted skin and injection-site reactions category for comparison across agents.
  4. 04HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In FAERS, skin and injection-site reactions comprised 32.6% of tirzepatide reports.

    In plain wordsClinical adverse event reports showed skin and injection-site reactions in 32.6% of tirzepatide reports.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSkin and injection-site reporting proportion
    Study

    Homo sapiensn: not reported in source

    FDA Adverse Event Reporting System clinical adverse event reports
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Reporting proportion
    32.6%
    tirzepatide reports

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Exenatide demonstrated the highest proportion of skin and injection-site reports (53.1%), followed by dulaglutide (33.5%), tirzepatide (32.6%), liraglutide (17.1%), semaglutide (12.2%), and lixisenatide (6.9%).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In addition, adverse event reports for tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide were extracted from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Summary · context
    Injection-site events were combined with skin-related adverse events to generate an adjusted skin and injection-site reactions category for comparison across agents.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone4

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 05HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled GLP-1 FAERS reports, skin and injection-site reactions accounted for 31.0% of reports.

    In plain wordsClinical adverse event reports showed skin and injection-site reactions in 31.0% of pooled GLP-1 reports.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSkin and injection-site reporting proportion
    Study

    Homo sapiensn: not reported in source

    FDA Adverse Event Reporting System clinical adverse event reports
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Reporting proportion
    31%
    pooled GLP-1 reports

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among 442,567 Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System reports, 137,412 (31.0%) involved skin and injection-site reactions, representing the third most frequently reported adverse event category.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In addition, adverse event reports for tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide were extracted from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Summary · context
    Injection-site events were combined with skin-related adverse events to generate an adjusted skin and injection-site reactions category for comparison across agents.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  2. 06HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled GLP-1 FAERS reports, skin and injection-site reactions accounted for 31.0% of reports.

    In plain wordsClinical adverse event reports showed skin and injection-site reactions in 31.0% of pooled GLP-1 reports.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSkin and injection-site reporting proportion
    Study

    Homo sapiensn: not reported in source

    FDA Adverse Event Reporting System clinical adverse event reports
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Reporting proportion
    31%
    pooled GLP-1 reports

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among 442,567 Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System reports, 137,412 (31.0%) involved skin and injection-site reactions, representing the third most frequently reported adverse event category.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In addition, adverse event reports for tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide were extracted from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Summary · context
    Injection-site events were combined with skin-related adverse events to generate an adjusted skin and injection-site reactions category for comparison across agents.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  3. 07HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled GLP-1 FAERS reports, skin and injection-site reactions accounted for 31.0% of reports.

    In plain wordsClinical adverse event reports showed skin and injection-site reactions in 31.0% of pooled GLP-1 reports.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSkin and injection-site reporting proportion
    Study

    Homo sapiensn: not reported in source

    FDA Adverse Event Reporting System clinical adverse event reports
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Reporting proportion
    31%
    pooled GLP-1 reports

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among 442,567 Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System reports, 137,412 (31.0%) involved skin and injection-site reactions, representing the third most frequently reported adverse event category.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In addition, adverse event reports for tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide were extracted from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Summary · context
    Injection-site events were combined with skin-related adverse events to generate an adjusted skin and injection-site reactions category for comparison across agents.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  4. 08HumanNot a test of Tirzepatide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled GLP-1 FAERS reports, skin and injection-site reactions accounted for 31.0% of reports.

    In plain wordsClinical adverse event reports showed skin and injection-site reactions in 31.0% of pooled GLP-1 reports.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSkin and injection-site reporting proportion
    Study

    Homo sapiensn: not reported in source

    FDA Adverse Event Reporting System clinical adverse event reports
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Skin and wound

    Measurements

    Reporting proportion
    31%
    pooled GLP-1 reports

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Among 442,567 Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System reports, 137,412 (31.0%) involved skin and injection-site reactions, representing the third most frequently reported adverse event category.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    In addition, adverse event reports for tirzepatide, semaglutide, liraglutide, exenatide, dulaglutide, and lixisenatide were extracted from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.
    Summary · context
    Injection-site events were combined with skin-related adverse events to generate an adjusted skin and injection-site reactions category for comparison across agents.

    In this study, Tirzepatide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Tirzepatide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 6Current

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  2. Version 5

    22 Oct 2026, 02:25 UTC

    Study results updated

  3. Versions 2 to 4

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    The same notice was added 3 times, first on 9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC. The status did not change between them.

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  4. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

Publication types

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.