Trial · Interventional
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4Registry dataAging Well: Targeting Obesity With GLP-1 Agonists to Enhance Physical and Vascular Health in Postmenopausal Women
Overview
- Status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Enrollment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Mayo Clinic · Other
- Design
- Randomized · Single masking
- Countries
1 country
United States
- Start
- 1 May 2025
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jul 2025
- Last update posted
- 20 Jul 2026
- Conditions
- Obesity · Menopause
Timeline
1 trial · 1 ongoing
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 4
Aging Well: Targeting Obesity With GLP-1 Agonists to Enhance Physical and Vascular Health in Postmenopausal Women
NCT070573101 May 2025 to est. 31 Mar 2027
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
In postmenopausal women, obesity increases the risk of physical function decline, premature aging, and vascular dysfunction. Semaglutide and tirzepatide are potent obesity medications. The goal is to determine the effect of weight loss induced by the new generation of GLP-1 receptor agonists on physical function, aging biomarkers, and vascular function in postmenopausal women with obesity.
Interventions
- semaglutide or tirzepatideDrug
- Lifestyle modification interventionBehavioral
Arms2
Experimental
Weight loss medication and standard lifestyle intervention
Subjects will receive tirzepatide or semaglutide in combination with a standard lifestyle intervention.
Active comparator
Standard lifestyle intervention only
Subjects will receive standard of care lifestyle intervention only.
Primary outcomes11
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Physical Function Measure: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score.
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
The SPPB is a standardized test that evaluates lower extremity function using three components: balance tests (standing in various positions), gait speed (walking a short distance), and chair stand (repeated standing from a seated position). Each component is scored from 0 to 4; the total score ranges from 0 to 12. Higher scores represent better physical function.
Physical Function Measure: Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (mCTSIB) performed on the Rehabilitation Artificial Physical Intelligence Database (RAPID) foot pressure mat
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
The mCTSIB assesses balance under four sensory conditions: eyes open/closed on firm and foam surfaces. Testing is performed while standing on the RAPID foot pressure mat, which captures center of pressure and postural sway data. The primary measure is average sway area of the four sensory conditions. The sway area is the area which is required to correct equilibrium, representing the total area covered by postural sway, measured in square centimeters (cm²).
Physical Function Measure: Standing Chest Throw Test with a 2-kg Weighted Ball using Motion Sensor Technology (MST)
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
This test evaluates upper body muscular power. Participants perform a two-handed chest throw of a 2-kg medicine ball from a standing position. The MST is used to record throw distance, velocity, and related performance metrics. The primary measure is Peak Power Score (W).
Physical Function Measure: Chair-to-Stand Tests using Motion Sensor Technology (MST)
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
This test assesses lower body strength and function. Participants are instructed to stand up from a chair and sit back down five times without using their arms. The MST measures movement dynamics. The primary measure is peak power score (W).
Physical Function Measure: Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
The 6MWT is a standardized submaximal exercise test used to assess functional aerobic capacity. Participants are instructed to walk as far as possible in six minutes along a flat, straight course. The total distance walked is recorded in feet. Longer walking distances indicate better aerobic capacity and endurance.
Physical Function Measure: Hand Grip Strength using a Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
Participants are instructed to squeeze the dynamometer with maximum effort, measured in kilograms. The highest value from multiple trials is recorded.
Physical Function Measure: Short Form-12 (SF-12) Health Survey
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
The SF-12 is a standardized, self-administered questionnaire designed to assess overall health-related quality of life. It includes 12 items that measure physical and mental health components, generating Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores. Scores are standardized on a scale where higher values indicate better health status. Both PCS and MCS scores typically range from 0 to 100, with 0 indicating the poorest health and 100 indicating the best possible health status.
Physical Function Measure: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Fatigue and Physical Function Domains
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
The PROMIS is a standardized set of self-reported questionnaires designed to measure health domains. This study includes the fatigue and physical function domains, which assess the participant's perceived level of tiredness and ability to perform daily physical activities. Responses generate standardized T-scores, calibrated to the general population. Higher fatigue T-scores indicate greater fatigue severity.
Aging Biomarkers: Cellular Senescence Markers in Plasma
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
Cellular senescence markers are measured in plasma samples to assess biological aging and cellular stress. These markers may include proteins associated with the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP). Quantification is performed using immunoassays. Higher levels of senescence markers indicate increased cellular senescence.
Difference between biological and chronological age
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
Epigenetic clocks estimate biological age by analyzing DNA methylation patterns at specific CpG sites across the genome. Biological age estimates are compared to chronological age to assess aging acceleration or deceleration. Biological age greater than chronological age indicates accelerated biological aging and potential increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Primary measure is the difference (ΔAge) between biological and chronological ages = reported in years.
Vascular Function Assessment: Reactive Hyperemia Index (RHI) using EndoPAT
Time frame · 24 weeks
Registry description
The RHI is measured using the EndoPAT device, which assesses endothelial function by evaluating changes in digital pulse volume during reactive hyperemia. This non-invasive test involves occluding blood flow in one arm followed by release to induce vasodilation, with pulse amplitude recorded via finger probes. Lower RHI values suggest endothelial dysfunction and increased cardiovascular risk.
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- from 46 Years up to 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.