Trial · Interventional
RecruitingPhase 3Registry dataTreating Prostate Cancer That Has Come Back After Surgery With Apalutamide and Targeted Radiation Based on PET Imaging
Overview
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Enrollment
- 804 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group · Network
- Design
- Randomized · Open label (no masking)
- Countries
1 country
United States
- Start
- 8 Oct 2020
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2032 (estimated)
- Completion
- 31 Dec 2032 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Jun 2020
- Last update posted
- 19 Aug 2026
- Conditions
- Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Carcinoma · Metastatic Prostate Carcinoma · Prostate Adenocarcinoma · Stage IVB Prostate Cancer AJCC v8
Timeline
1 trial · 1 ongoing
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 3
Treating Prostate Cancer That Has Come Back After Surgery With Apalutamide and Targeted Radiation Based on PET Imaging
NCT044232118 Oct 2020 to est. 31 Dec 2032
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This phase III trial tests two questions by two separate comparisons of therapies. The first question is whether enhanced therapy (apalutamide in combination with abiraterone + prednisone) added to standard of care (prostate radiation therapy and short term androgen deprivation) is more effective compared to standard of care alone in patients with prostate cancer who experience biochemical recurrence (a rise in the blood level of prostate specific antigen \[PSA\] after surgical removal of the prostate cancer). A second question tests treatment in patients with biochemical recurrence who show prostate cancer spreading outside the pelvis (metastasis) by positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. In these patients, the benefit of adding metastasis-directed radiation to enhanced therapy (apalutamide in combination with abiraterone + prednisone) is tested. Diagnostic procedures, such as PET, may help doctors look for cancer that has spread to the pelvis. Androgens are hormones that may cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Apalutamide may help fight prostate cancer by blocking the use of androgens by the tumor cells. Metastasis-directed targeted radiation therapy uses high energy rays to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors that have spread. This trial may help doctors determine if using PET results to deliver more tailored treatment (i.e., adding apalutamide, with or without targeted radiation therapy, to standard of care treatment) works better than standard of care treatment alone in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.
Interventions
- 3-Dimensional Conformal Radiation TherapyRadiation
- ApalutamideDrug
- Computed TomographyProcedure
- DegarelixDrug
- External Beam Radiation TherapyRadiation
- Fluciclovine F18Other
- Goserelin AcetateDrug
- Intensity-Modulated Proton TherapyProcedure
- Intensity-Modulated Radiation TherapyRadiation
- Leuprolide AcetateDrug
- Magnetic Resonance ImagingProcedure
- Positron Emission TomographyProcedure
- Quality-of-Life AssessmentOther
- Questionnaire AdministrationOther
- RelugolixDrug
- Stereotactic Body Radiation TherapyRadiation
- TriptorelinDrug
- Volume Modulated Arc TherapyRadiation
Arms4
Active comparator
Arm A (EBRT, short-term androgen deprivation therapy [STAD])
STEP 0: Patients undergo SOC PET/CT or PET/MR scan at baseline. Patients randomized to Arms C or D and receiving fluciclovine F18 IV undergo a repeat PET2 at time of PSA progression or clinical concerns for progression or 12 months after completion of enhanced systemic therapy, whichever occurs first. Patients in Arm C or D using another tracer for PET1 do not undergo PET2. STEP 1: Patients who are PET negative for extera pelvic metastases undergo SOC EBRT for 6 months. Patients also receive goserelin acetate SC, leuprolide acetate IM, triptorelin IM, relugolix PO, or degarelix SC for 6 months starting up to 3 months prior to EBRT but no later than 7 days after start of EBRT. All treatment continues for 6 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Experimental
Arm B (EBRT, STAD, apalutamide)
STEP 0: Patients undergo SOC PET/CT or PET/MR scan at baseline. Patients randomized to Arms C or D and receiving fluciclovine F18 IV undergo a repeat PET2 at time of PSA progression or clinical concerns for progression or 12 months after completion of enhanced systemic therapy, whichever occurs first. Patients in Arm C or D using another tracer for PET1 do not undergo PET2. STEP 1: Patients who are PET negative for extra pelvic metastases undergo SOC EBRT and receive goserelin acetate SC, leuprolide acetate IM, triptorelin IM, relugolix PO, or degarelix SC as in Arm A. Patients also receive apalutamide PO QD for 6 months in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Experimental
Arm C (EBRT, STAD, apalutamide)
STEP 0: Patients undergo SOC PET/CT or PET/MR scan at baseline. Patients randomized to Arms C or D and receiving fluciclovine F18 IV undergo a repeat PET2 at time of PSA progression or clinical concerns for progression or 12 months after completion of enhanced systemic therapy, whichever occurs first. Patients in Arm C or D using another tracer for PET1 do not undergo PET2. STEP 1: Patients who are PET positive for extra pelvic metastases undergo SOC EBRT and receive goserelin acetate SC, leuprolide acetate IM, triptorelin IM, relugolix PO, or degarelix SC as in Arm A. Patients also receive apalutamide PO QD as in Arm B.
Experimental
Arm D (EBRT, STAD, apalutamide, RT)
STEP 0: Patients undergo SOC PET/CT or PET/MR scan at baseline. Patients randomized to Arms C or D and receiving fluciclovine F18 IV undergo a repeat PET2 at time of PSA progression or clinical concerns for progression or 12 months after completion of enhanced systemic therapy, whichever occurs first. Patients in Arm C or D using another tracer for PET1 do not undergo PET2. STEP 1: Patients who are PET positive for extra pelvic metastases undergo SOC EBRT and receive goserelin acetate SC, leuprolide acetate IM, triptorelin IM, relugolix PO, or degarelix SC as in Arm A and apalutamide PO QD as in Arm B. Patients also undergo SBRT or 3D CRT, IMRT (including VMAT), and IMPT over 3-10 fractions in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Primary outcomes4
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Progression-free survival (PFS)
Time frame · From randomization to radiographic progression by conventional imaging or positron emission tomography (PET), symptomatic disease or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years
Registry description
The power of the PFS analysis is 85% using one-sided 0.025 level stratified logrank test. The overall type I error will be controlled using an O'Brien-Fleming boundary function
PFS prolongation in patients without PET-evidence of extrapelvic metastases
Time frame · Up to 10 years
Registry description
Will evaluate whether the addition of enhanced systemic therapy to standard of care salvage therapy could prolong PFS in this patient population. Will be an intention-to-treat analysis of all randomized patients and performed in parallel with patients with PET-evidence of extrapelvic metastases.
PFS prolongation in patients with PET-evidence of extrapelvic metastases
Time frame · Up to 10 years
Registry description
Will evaluate whether the addition of metastasis-directed radiation therapy to standard of care salvage therapy and enhanced systemic therapy could prolong PFS in this patient population. Will be an intention-to-treat analysis of all randomized patients and performed in parallel without patients with PET-evidence of extrapelvic metastases.
Quality of life (QOL)
Time frame · Up to 24 months
Registry description
Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize QOL over time in each arm.
Secondary outcomes(12)
Overall survival (OS)
Time frame · From randomization to death or date last known alive, assessed up to 10 years
Registry description
Will be characterized by the method of Kaplan and Meier and a logrank test will be used to compare OS between the two arms in each cohort.
Event-free survival
Time frame · From randomization to radiographic progression by conventional imaging or PET, symptomatic disease, or initiation of new treatment for the disease or death, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years
Registry description
Will be characterized by the method of Kaplan and Meier and a logrank test will be used to compare EFS between the two arms in each cohort.
Time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression
Time frame · From randomization to documented PSA progression or radiographic progression, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 10 years
Registry description
Patients without any progression will be censored at the date of last disease assessment that shows free of PSA progression. Will be characterized by the method of Kaplan and Meier and a logrank test will be used to compare time to PSA progression between the two arms in each cohort.
Incidence of adverse events
Time frame · Up to 10 years
Registry description
Toxicity will be defined using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Detection rate of fluciclovine F18 (18F-fluciclovine) PET
Time frame · At time of PSA recurrence, as clinically indicated or 12 months after completion of enhanced systemic therapy (whichever occurs first), assessed up to 10 years
Registry description
For the detection rate, the proportion of baseline standard of care 18F-fluciclovine PET (PET1) positive results at the patient and regional (prostate fossa, intrapelvic soft tissue/lymph node, extrapelvic soft tissue/lymph node, and bone metastases) level will be calculated and its 95% confidence interval will be estimated using the Exact method based on the binomial distribution.
Concordance of detection rate with the follow-up conventional imaging modalities (CIM)
Time frame · At time of PSA recurrence, as clinically indicated or 12 months after completion of enhanced systemic therapy (whichever occurs first), assessed up to 10 years
Registry description
Will use Cohen's Kappa coefficient to measure the agreement between dichotomized PET results and the dichotomized CIM results. Baseline CIM comparison will not be performed because as per our study eligibility criteria, baseline CIM will be negative for metastases.
Distribution of 18F-fluciclovine PET-positive lesions among anatomic sites
Time frame · Baseline
Registry description
The rate of 18F-fluciclovine PET-positive lesions will be reported for each anatomic site, including prostate fossa, intrapelvic soft tissue/lymph node, extrapelvic soft tissue/lymph node, and bone metastases. Their confidence intervals will be estimated using the Exact method for the binomial distribution. To evaluate if PSA (level, doubling time, velocity) and other relevant clinical parameters affects the positivity distribution, will use the logistic regression to model with the binary outcome (positive vs. negative from PET) and covariates will include anatomic site, PSA, and other clinical parameters. Will test the interactions between anatomic site and PSA (plus other clinical parameters) to see if the positivity distribution across anatomic site may change according to the levels of the interacted terms. Will use the technique of generalized estimating equation to account for the outcome correlations within subjects.
Value of repeat PET to assess response to therapy compared to standard response assessments
Time frame · At time of second PSA recurrence or 12 months after completion of enhanced systemic therapy (whichever occurs first), assessed up to 10 years
Registry description
Analyses will be conducted to evaluate qualitative visual evidence of 18F-fluciclovine PET positive metastatic lesions and quantitative PET standardized-uptake value (SUV) changes on a lesion-to-lesion basis from 18F-fluciclovine PET1 (baseline) to PET2 on visually determined sites of recurrence and metastatic disease. This will be compared to reference standard-of-care conventional imaging (Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria) and PSA response at PET2 time point to determine PET2 response to therapy. PET2 visual and quantitative assessment will also be compared to PFS in the time-to-event analysis using a log-rank test (PET2 visual assessment) and a Cox proportional hazards regression (PET2 quantitative assessment). PET SUV parameters to be obtained at PET1 and PET2 will include SUVmax, SUVpeak. PET SUV change from PET1 to PET2 will include absolute SUVmax and SUVpeak change (PET2-PET1) and percent change of SUVmax and SUVpeak (% change = 100\*\[(PET2-PET1)/PET1\]).)
Comparison - Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)- prostate (P)
Time frame · At baseline and 3, 6, 9, 12 months
Registry description
For the PET-negative cohort, with 216 analyzable patients in each arm, the study will have about 84% power to detect a 6-point (0.29 standard deviation) difference between the two arms using a two-sample t test with two-sided type I error of 0.05. The power will be greater than 99% if the difference between the two arms is 10 points (0.48 standard deviation). For the PET-positive cohort, with 146 analyzable patients in each arm, the study will have 68% and 98% power to detect a 6-point (0.29 standard deviation) and a 10-point (0.48 standard deviation) differences between the two arms, respectively, using the same test.
Change in FACT-P and Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue
Time frame · Baseline up to 6 months
Registry description
A paired t test will be used to compare FACT-P scores at these two time points in each arm. A two-sample t test will be performed to compare the changes in FACT-P scores from baseline to 6 months between the two arms of each cohort. The FACIT-Fatigue scores at 6 months will be compared between the two arms of each cohort using a two-sample t test.
QOL Assessments at Progression
Time frame · Up to 10 years
Registry description
A paired t test will be used to compare FACT-P total scores, FACIT-Fatigue scores and pain scores at these two time points in each arm. The changes in these scores from baseline to progression will be evaluated in each arm.
FACT- cognitive functioning (Cog)
Time frame · Up to 12 months
Registry description
Will be compared between two groups of patients on this study, patients receiving antiandrogen therapy (ADT) + apalutamide (Arms B, C and D) and patients receiving ADT alone (Arm A), at different time points. To ensure similarity of the three arms with systemic treatments (Arms B, C and D), a comparison in FACT-Cog total scores among these three arms will be performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test before combining them together to be compared with Arm A.
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Other registry references
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
- DerivedMorgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, Chapin BF, Chen DYT, Cheng HH, Chou R, Jacene HA, Kamran SC, Kim SK, Kirkby E, Luckenbaugh AN, Nathanson BJ, Nyame YA, Posadas EM, Tran PT, Chen RC. Salvage Therapy for Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline Part II: Treatment Delivery for Non-metastatic Biochemical Recurrence After Primary Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):518-525. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003891. Epub 2024 Feb 29. PMID 38421243
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- Male
- Age
- from 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.