Change in Average 3-day Fistula Percent Volume
| Group | Value (Percent change in fistula volume) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Teduglutide Intervention | 76.33 | 355.36 |
| Standard of Care Intervention | 441.67 | 824.87 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry dataUnited States
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether Teduglutide is safe and feasible to be given for the treatment of enterocutaneous fistula (ECF). The hypothesis is that the drug will be well tolerated and will improve the volume of daily ECF output as well as improve the functional quality of life.
Experimental
Standard of Care followed by Teduglutide
Participants in this group will receive standard of care treatment for the first 8 weeks followed by daily Teduglutide for the next 8 weeks. Subjects with a favorable response will be offered an open label extension during which they will continue to receive teduglutide for up to another 12 months or permanent fistula closure.
Experimental
Teduglutide followed by Standard of Care
Participants in this group will receive daily Teduglutide treatment for the first 8 weeks followed by standard of care for the next 8 weeks. Subjects with a favorable response will be offered an open label extension during which they will continue to receive teduglutide for up to another 12 months or permanent fistula closure
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change in Average 3-day Fistula Percent Volume
Time frame · Baseline, Up to 8 weeks
Percent fistula volume will be reported from the participant
Number of Participants With Ceased Fistula Output
Time frame · Up to 16 weeks
As evaluated by treating physician of having at least 1 ceased fistula output
Quality of Life as Measured by ASCQ-Me® v2.0 Social Functioning - Short Form
Time frame · Up to 16 weeks
Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement (ASCQ-Me) Version 2.0 Social Functioning - Short Form questionnaire has a total score ranging from 5-25 with the higher score indicating a healthier status.
Quality of Life as Measured by the ASCQ-Me® v2.0 Sleep Impact - Short Form
Time frame · Up to 16 weeks
Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life Measurement (ASCQ-Me) Version 2.0 Sleep Impact - Short Form questionnaire has a total score ranging from 5-25 with the higher score indicating a healthier status
Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS Scale v1.2 - Global Health
Time frame · Up to 16 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information Systems Global Health has a total score ranging from 10-50 with the higher score indicating a healthier status
Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS Scale v1.0 - Gastrointestinal Belly Pain 5a
Time frame · Up to 16 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information Systems (PROMIS-GI) Gastrointestinal Belly Pain 5a questionnaire has a total score ranging from 1-25 with the lower score indicating a healthier status
Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS Scale v1.0 - Gastrointestinal Diarrhea 6a
Time frame · Up to 16 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information Systems (PROMIS-GI) Gastrointestinal Diarrhea 6a questionnaire has a total score ranging from 1-30 with the lower score indicating a healthier status
Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS Scale v1.0 - Gastrointestinal Nausea and Vomiting 4a
Time frame · Up to 16 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information Systems (PROMIS-GI) Gastrointestinal Nausea and Vomiting 4a questionnaire has a total score ranging from 1-20 with the lower score indicating a healthier status
Quality of Life as Measured by the PROMIS Scale v2.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 8a
Time frame · Up to 16 weeks
Patient Reported Outcome Measures Information Systems (PROMIS) Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities - Short Form 8a questionnaire has a total score ranging from 8-40 with the lower score indicating a healthier status
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Percent change in fistula volume) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Teduglutide Intervention | 76.33 | 355.36 |
| Standard of Care Intervention | 441.67 | 824.87 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| All Participants | 3 |
| Group | Value (score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Teduglutide Intervention | 20.5 | 5.2 |
| Standard of Care Intervention | 20 | 7.7 |
| Group | Value (score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Teduglutide Intervention | 19.5 | 1.3 |
| Standard of Care Intervention | 19.5 | 4.1 |
| Group | Value (score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Teduglutide Intervention | 30 | 6.3 |
| Standard of Care Intervention | 35 | 10.2 |
| Group | Value (score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Teduglutide Intervention | 6.0 | 8.2 |
| Standard of Care Intervention | 7.5 | 6.9 |
| Group | Value (score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Teduglutide Intervention | 8.0 | 4.4 |
| Standard of Care Intervention | 6.0 | 4.0 |
| Group | Value (score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Teduglutide Intervention | 3.0 | 2.8 |
| Standard of Care Intervention | 3.5 | 3.3 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| On TeduglutideThe study is a crossover design. All participants received 8 weeks of daily Teduglutide. Teduglutide: Daily 0.05 mg/kg Teduglutide administered subcutaneously. | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 6 / 6 |
| On Standard of CareThe study is a crossover design. All participants received 8 weeks of daily Standard of Care Therapy. Standard of Care: The standard of care treatment of ECF which includes meticulous wound care, optimizations of nutrition, use of acid-suppression medications and anti-motility agents as per treating physician discretion. | 0 / 6 | 0 / 6 | 2 / 6 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
2 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2022
Yeh et al. 2022Clinical nutrition ESPENcited by 4
PMID 35871951DOI 10.1016/j.clnesp.2022.04.031PUB-35871951
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2011
Jeppesen et al. 2011Gutcited by 323
PMID 21317170PMC3112364DOI 10.1136/gut.2010.218271PUB-21317170
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated