Five of six adults met the fistula-volume response endpoint during teduglutide treatment, but not during their standard-care arm.
In plain wordsFive of six adults had the defined fistula-volume response with teduglutide, but not with standard care.
- Peptide
- Teduglutide
- Outcome
- DecreaseFistula volume response
- Study
n = 6
- Comparator
- Standard care
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Gastrointestinal protection · Gastrointestinal
- Studied dose
- Dose not stated · 2 monthsAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Subjects meeting primary endpoint (fistula volume decrease)
- 5 subjects
- during teduglutide treatment; five of six enrolled subjects
Source sentences
Five of six enrolled subjects met the definition for the primary efficacy endpoint; these clinical responses were not observed during the SOC arm in these subjects.
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
The primary efficacy endpoint was decrease in fistula volume by 20% of baseline 3-day average.
Adults (age >18) with low-output (<200 mL/d) ECF were randomized to 2 months of continuing standard-of-care (SOC) followed by crossover to 2 months of SOC + TED or the reverse order.
Six out of 10 planned subjects were randomized and completed the study, which was terminated early due to slow enrollment during the Covid-19 pandemic.