Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry data

A Monotherapy Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Dose Levels of Albiglutide in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
494 participants (actual)
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline · Industry
Design
Randomized · Double masking
Countries
1 country

Japan

Start
Feb 2013
Primary completion
Jun 2014
Completion
Feb 2015
First posted
27 Nov 2012 (estimated)
Last update posted
22 Sept 2016 (estimated)
Conditions
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
2013201420152016
  1. Ph 3

    A Monotherapy Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of 2 Dose Levels of Albiglutide in Japanese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)

    NCT01733758

    Feb 2013 to Feb 2015

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

This study is designed to examine the efficacy and safety of 2 dose levels of weekly subcutaneously injected albiglutide compared with placebo and an open label reference arm of daily subcutaneous injections of liraglutide, in Japanese subjects with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Interventions

  • Albiglutide 30 mg weeklyDrug
  • Albiglutide 50 mg weeklyDrug
  • PlaceboDrug
  • Liraglutide 0.9 mg dailyDrug

Arms4

  • Experimental

    Albiglutide 30 mg weekly

    Subjects will be randomly assigned to double blind albiglutide 30 mg weekly treatment for 52 weeks

  • Experimental

    Albiglutide 50 mg weekly

    Subjects will be randomly assigned to double blind albiglutide 50 mg weekly until Week 52

  • Placebo comparator

    Placebo

    Subjects will be randomly assigned to double blind matching albiglutide placebo administered weekly. Subjects will then cross-over to double-blind treatment with albiglutide 30 mg weekly at Week 24 until Week 52

  • Active comparator

    Liraglutide 0.9 mg daily

    Subjects will be randomly assigned to open-label liraglutide for 52 weeks

Primary outcomes2

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Model-adjusted Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline and Week 24

    Registry description

    HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3 month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last nonmissing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the value at Baseline. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): Change at Week 24 = treatment (placebo, albiglutide 30 mg, albiglutide 50 mg) + Baseline HbA1c + prior diabetes therapy + age category (\<65 years versus ≥65 years). Participants who discontinued from study treatment before Week 24 had their last post-Baseline HbA1c carried forward for the analysis unless the value is past 14 days after the last dose of study drug. The open-label liraglutide group was a reference group and not included in the primary endpoint analysis model. Descriptive summary statistics are provided as a separate outcome measure.

  2. Mean HbA1c at Baseline, Week 24, and Change From Baseline at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline and Week 24

    Registry description

    HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3 month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last nonmissing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the value at Baseline. Participants who discontinued from study treatment before Week 24 had their last post-Baseline HbA1c value carried forward for the summary, unless the value was past 14 days after the last dose of study drug. The open-label liraglutide group was a reference group; descriptive statistics comparing albiglutide and liraglutide were exploratory endpoints.

Secondary outcomes(9)
  1. Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline and Week 52

    Registry description

    HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3- month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at Baseline.

  2. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Levels of HbA1c (i.e., the Percentage of Participants Achieving Treatment Goal of <6.5% and <7.0%) at Week 24

    Time frame · Week 24

    Registry description

    HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3 month period. Clinically meaningful levels of response in HbA1c are defined as \<6.5% and \<7.0%. Participants who discontinued the study before Week 24 had their last post-Baseline HbA1c value carried forwrad for the summary unless the value was past 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Levels of HbA1c (i.e., the Percentage of Participants Achieving Treatment Goal of <6.5% and <7.0%) at Week 52

    Time frame · Week 52

    Registry description

    HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3 month period. Clinically meaningful levels of response in HbA1c are defined as \<6.5% and \<7.0%.

  4. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline and Week 24

    Registry description

    FPG is an indicator of efficacy. The Baseline FPG value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the FPG value at Week 24 minus the FPG value at Baseline. Participants who discontinued from study treatment before Week 24 had their last post-Baseline FPG observation carried forward for the summary unless the value was 14 days past the last dose of study drug.

  5. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline and Week 52

    Registry description

    FPG is an indicator of efficacy. The Baseline FPG value is defined as the last non-missing value on or before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the FPG value at Week 52 minus the FPG value at Baseline.

  6. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

    Time frame · Baseline and Week 24

    Registry description

    The Baseline body weight value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the body weight value at Week 24 minus the value at Baseline. Participants who discontinued from the study treatment before Week 24 had their last non-missing weight carried forward for the summary, unless the value is past 14 days after the last dose of study drug.

  7. Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

    Time frame · Baseline and Week 52

    Registry description

    The Baseline body weight value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the body weight value at Week 52 minus the value at Baseline.

  8. Time to Study Withdrawal Due to Hyperglycemia

    Time frame · Baseline through Week 52

    Registry description

    Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia after uptitration were to be withdrawn from the study. Hyperglycemia is defined as a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥280 mg/dL (≥15.5 mmol/L) from ≥Week 2 to \<Week 4, ≥250 mg/dL (≥13.9 mmol/L) from ≥Week 4 to \<Week 12, or ≥230 mg/dL (≥12.8 mmol/L) from ≥Week 12 to \<Week 52, confirmed a second evaluation within 7 days.

  9. Time to Study Withdrawal for Any Reason

    Time frame · Baseline through Week 52

    Registry description

    Time to withdrawal was calculated as the number of days between the date of first dose and the date of withdrawal plus 1. Time to withdrawal was summarized by visit.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline and Week 24

Model-adjusted Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

GroupValue (Percentage of HbA1c in the blood)Spread
Placebo0.250.068
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-1.100.047
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly-1.300.049
Open-Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg Dailynot posted–
Primary outcomeMean· Baseline and Week 24

Mean HbA1c at Baseline, Week 24, and Change From Baseline at Week 24

GroupValue (Percentage of HbA1c in the blood)Spread
Placebo8.160.877
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly8.060.783
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly8.150.825
Open-Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg Daily8.070.787
Secondary and other outcome results(6)
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline and Week 52

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 52

GroupValue (Percentage of HbA1c in the blood)Spread
Placebo-1.070.695
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly-1.070.790
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly-1.340.753
Open-Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg Daily-1.170.776
Secondary outcomeNumber· Week 24

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Levels of HbA1c (i.e., the Percentage of Participants Achieving Treatment Goal of <6.5% and <7.0%) at Week 24

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Placebo1
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly31
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly47
Open-Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg Daily29
Secondary outcomeNumber· Week 52

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Levels of HbA1c (i.e., the Percentage of Participants Achieving Treatment Goal of <6.5% and <7.0%) at Week 52

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Placebo14
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly44
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly53
Open-Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg Daily27
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline and Week 24

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

GroupValue (Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL))Spread
Placebo159.337.07
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly157.133.81
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly158.732.82
Open-Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg Daily157.231.22
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline and Week 52

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

GroupValue (Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL))Spread
Placebo154.535.65
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly154.729.36
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly159.833.52
Open-Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg Daily157.430.27
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline and Week 24

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 24

GroupValue (Kilograms (kg))Spread
Placebo68.6512.088
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly69.4613.453
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly71.5412.907
Open-Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg Daily72.6513.758

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Placebo - Before Switch(Before Switch to 30 mg albiglutide) Participants received double blind matching albiglutide placebo as a subcutaneous injection weekly to Week 24.–0 / 7733 / 77
Placebo - After Switch(After Switch to 30 mg algiblutide) After Week 24, participants received albiglutide 30 mg as a subcutaneous injection weekly to Week 52.–0 / 6524 / 65
Albiglutide 30 mg WeeklyParticipants received double blind albiglutide 30 mg as a subcutaneous injection weekly to Week 52.–5 / 16085 / 160
Albiglutide 50 mg WeeklyParticipants received double blind albiglutide 30 mg as a subcutaneous injection weekly until Week 4. Starting at Week 4, participants received albiglutide 50 mg as a subcutaneous injection weekly to Week 52.–6 / 15076 / 150
Open Label Liraglutide 0.9 mg DailyParticipants received open label liraglutide as a subcutaneous injection daily at a dose of 0.3 mg with weekly forced uptitrations to a dose of 0.6 mg then a dose of 0.9 mg (maximum dose in Japan). The dose of 0.9 mg daily was given to Week 52.–0 / 10346 / 103

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies0

Studies that cite this trial.

No study cites this trial.

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 20 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Subjects with diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, treated with diet and exercise or a stable dose of 1 OAD at screening * Body mass index (BMI) 17 to 40 kg/ m\^2 inclusive * Subjects who are OAD naïve, HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0% at Screening and at Visit 2; for subjects who enter the study with 1 OAD, HbA1c between 6.5% and 9.5% at Screening and HbA1c between 7.0% and 10.0% at Visit 2 * Creatinine clearance \>30 mL/min (calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault formula) Exclusion Criteria: * History of type 1 diabetes mellitus •Female subject is pregnant, lactating, or \<6 weeks postpartum• * Clinically significant cardiovascular and/or cerebrovascular disease * Current ongoing symptomatic biliary disease, clinical signs or symptoms of pancreatitis, or a history of chronic or acute pancreatitis, as determined by the investigator * Serum amylase \>=3 ×ULN and/or serum lipase \>=2 × ULN and/or subject is experiencing any symptoms possibly related to pancreatitis * Prior use of a TZD or GLP-1R agonist within 4 months before Screening

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.