Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
| Group | Value (percentage of HbA1c) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | -1.13 | 0.12 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | -1.12 | 0.12 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | -1.19 | 0.13 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name AWARD-7
United States, Brazil, Hungary, Mexico, Poland, Romania, South Africa, Spain, Ukraine
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The purpose of this study is to determine the glycemic efficacy and safety of dulaglutide compared to insulin glargine in the treatment of participants with type 2 diabetes and moderate or severe chronic kidney disease.
Active comparator
Insulin glargine
Insulin glargine was administered subcutaneously (SC) at bedtime per a modified forced-titration treat-to-target algorithm. Participants were instructed to administer their titrated prandial insulin lispro dose SC with the three most significant meals of the day.
Experimental
0.75 mg Dulaglutide
0.75 milligram (mg) of dulaglutide was administered once weekly as a SC injection. Participants were instructed to administer their titrated prandial insulin lispro dose SC with the three most significant meals of the day.
Experimental
1.5 mg Dulaglutide
1.5 mg of dulaglutide was administered once weekly as a SC injection. Participants were instructed to administer their titrated prandial insulin lispro dose SC with the three most significant meals of the day.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. Least square (LS) means in HbA1c were calculated using a restricted maximum likelihood (REML) based mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the change in HbA1c as the dependent variable and treatment, macroalbuminuria (MA) region, Baseline CKD Severity, week, treatment\*week, baseline HbA1c (%), log baseline eGFR (within CKD severity), and participant was the random effect. Covariance structure = Unstructured.
Percentage of Participants Whose HbA1c Was <7.0%
Time frame · 26 Weeks
Percentage of participants whose HbA1c was \<7.0% based on last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Percentage of Participants Whose HbA1c Was <8.0%
Time frame · 26 Weeks
Percentage of Participants whose HbA1c was \<8.0% based on last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Change From Baseline in 8-Point Self-Monitored Plasma Glucose (SMPG)
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
The daily mean of 8-point SMPG profile at Week 26 is presented. Participants were required to perform two 8-point SMPG profiles over a 1-week period at 5 separate times throughout the study. LS means were calculated using the MMRM model including the corresponding baseline value as a continuous covariate, as well as baseline HbA1c, MA-region, treatment, week, treatment\*week, baseline CKD severity, and log baseline eGFR (within CKD severity).The two 8-point SMPG profiles were collected on two non-consecutive days (pre-meal and 2-hour postprandial SMPG x \[morning, midday, and evening meals in one day\] + bedtime + 5 hours after bedtime).
Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose (FG)
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
LS means were calculated using MMRM with the change in FG as the dependent variable and treatment, MA -region, Baseline CKD Severity, week, treatment\*week, baseline FG, baseline HbA1c (%), log baseline eGFR (within CKD severity), and participant was the random effect. Covariance structure = Unstructured
Change From Baseline in Mean Daily Insulin Lispro Dose
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
The mean daily insulin was based on a 4-week interval prior to week 26 assessments. LS means were calculated using a REML based mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the change in mean daily insulin as the dependent variable and treatment, MA-region, Baseline HbA1c, baseline mean daily insulin, baseline CKD Severity, week, treatment\*week, log baseline eGFR (within CKD severity), and participant was the random effect. Covariance structure = Unstructured.
Percentage of Participants With Estimated Average Glucose <154 mg/dL
Time frame · 26 Weeks
Percentage of Participants With Estimated Average Glucose \<154 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Change From Baseline in Serum Creatinine (sCr)
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
Change from baseline in serum creatinine (sCr) levels after treatment.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
The change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by using CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equation.
Change From Baseline in Estimated Creatinine Clearance (eCrCl)
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
Estimated creatinine clearance (eCrCl) was calculated by Cockcroft-Gault \[Cockcroft and Gault 1976\] equation using baseline estimated lean body weight.
Change From Baseline in Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR)
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
The change from baseline in Urinary Albumin to Creatinine Ratio (UACR).
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame · Baseline, 26 Weeks
LS means were calculated from a REML based MMRM model: Change from Baseline = treatment, week, treatment\*Week, MA-region, Baseline HbA1c (%), Baseline Body Weight (kg), Baseline CKD Severity, Log Baseline eGFR (within CKD severity), where participant enters the model as a random effect. Covariance structure = Unstructured. •
Percentage of Participants With Self-Reported Hypoglycemic Events (HE)
Time frame · Baseline through 26 Weeks
Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as an episode requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of ≤3.9 mmol/L (≤70 mg/dL), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurs between bedtime and waking). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events was summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of other nonserious AEs, and all SAEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events section.
Rate of Hypoglycemic Events
Time frame · Baseline through 26 Weeks
Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as total HE rate, documented symptomatic hypoglycemia, severe hypoglycemia, and nocturnal. The 1-year adjusted rate of HEs was summarized cumulatively at 26 weeks. A summary of other nonserious AEs, and all SAEs, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events section.
Change From Baseline in HbA1c
Time frame · Baseline, 52 Weeks
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. LS means in HbA1c were calculated using a REML based mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the change in HbA1c as the dependent variable and treatment, MA region, Baseline CKD Severity, week, treatment\*week, baseline HbA1c (%), log baseline eGFR (within CKD severity), and participant was the random effect. Covariance structure = Unstructured.
Percentage of Participants Whose HbA1c is <7.0%
Time frame · 52 Weeks
Percentage of participants whose HbA1c was \<7.0% based on last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Percentage of Participants Whose HbA1c is <8.0%
Time frame · 52 Weeks
Percentage of participants whose HbA1c was \<8.0% based on last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Change From Baseline in 8-Point SMPG
Time frame · Baseline, 52 Weeks
The daily mean of 8-point SMPG profile at Week 52 is presented. Participants were required to perform two 8-point SMPG profiles over a 1-week period at 5 separate times throughout the study. LS means were calculated using the MMRM model including the corresponding baseline value as a continuous covariate, as well as baseline HbA1c, MA-region, treatment, week, treatment\*week, baseline CKD severity, and log baseline eGFR (within CKD severity).The two 8-point SMPG profiles were collected on two non-consecutive days (pre-meal and 2-hour postprandial SMPG x \[morning, midday, and evening meals in one day\] + bedtime + 5 hours after bedtime).
Change From Baseline in FG
Time frame · Baseline, 52 Weeks
LS means were calculated using MMRM with the change in FG as the dependent variable and treatment, MA -region, Baseline CKD Severity, week, treatment\*week, baseline FG, baseline HbA1c (%), log baseline eGFR (within CKD severity), and participant was the random effect. Covariance structure = Unstructured
Change in Mean Daily Insulin Lispro Dose
Time frame · Baseline, 52 Weeks
The mean daily insulin was based on a 4-week interval prior to week 52 assessments. LS means were calculated using a REML based mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with the change in mean daily insulin as the dependent variable and treatment, MA-region, Baseline HbA1c, baseline mean daily insulin, baseline CKD Severity, week, treatment\*week, log baseline eGFR (within CKD severity), and participant was the random effect. Covariance structure = Unstructured.
Percentage of Participants With Estimated Average Glucose <154 mg/dL
Time frame · 52 Weeks
Percentage of Participants With Estimated Average Glucose \<154 milligram/deciliter (mg/dL) was based on last observation carried forward (LOCF).
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percentage of HbA1c) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | -1.13 | 0.12 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | -1.12 | 0.12 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | -1.19 | 0.13 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | 34.6 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | 31.7 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | 37.5 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | 75.3 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | 72.6 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | 78.3 |
| Group | Value (milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | -37.6 | 3.41 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | -31.7 | 3.53 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | -33.7 | 3.77 |
| Group | Value (milligram/deciliter (mg/dL)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | -19.1 | 6.00 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | 17.7 | 6.14 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | 23.1 | 6.50 |
| Group | Value (Units/day (U/day)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | 16.64 | 2.76 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | 26.16 | 2.80 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | 18.12 | 3.00 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | 64.9 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | 52.5 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | 56.4 |
| Group | Value (mg/dL) |
|---|---|
| Insulin Glargine | 0.10 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mg | 0.02 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mg | 0.04 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin GlargineInsulin glargine administered SC to be given at bedtime per sliding scale. Participants were instructed to administer their titrated prandial insulin lispro dose SC with the three most significant meals of the day. | – | 56 / 194 | 130 / 194 |
| Dulaglutide 0.75 mgDulaglutide 0.75 mg administered once weekly as a SC injection. Participants were instructed to administer their titrated prandial insulin lispro dose SC with the three most significant meals of the day. | – | 48 / 190 | 134 / 190 |
| Dulaglutide 1.5 mgDulaglutide 1.5 mg administered once weekly as a SC injection. Participants were instructed to administer their titrated prandial insulin lispro dose SC with the three most significant meals of the day. | – | 41 / 192 | 144 / 192 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
2 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2025
Natale et al. 2025The Cochrane database of systematic reviewscited by 8
PMID 39963952PMC11834151DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd015849.pub2PUB-39963952
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018
Tuttle et al. 2018The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinologycited by 506
PMID 29910024DOI 10.1016/s2213-8587(18)30104-9PUB-29910024
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated