Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 192 · 2018

17 results

Dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease (AWARD-7): a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial.

Tuttle KR, Lakshmanan MC, Rayner B, Busch RS, Zimmermann AG, Woodward DB, Botros FT

The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology14 Jun 2018Cited by 506 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study17

16 results from studies that gave the peptide. 16 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with T2D and chronic kidney disease, dulaglutide 1.5 mg was non-inferior to insulin glargine for HbA1c reduction.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, dulaglutide 1.5 mg met the non-inferiority criterion versus insulin glargine for HbA1c reduction.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedHbA1c change at 26 weeks
    Study

    n = 183

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg weekly · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c change
    −1.2%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    HbA1c change
    −1.1%
    insulin glargine, 26 weeks
    HbA1c difference versus insulin glargine
    −0.05%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg minus insulin glargine, 26 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The effects on HbA1c change at 26 weeks of dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·75 mg were non-inferior to those of insulin glargine (least squares mean [LSM] -1·2% [SE 0·1] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg [183 patients]
    Summary
    -1·1% [0·1] with insulin glargine [186 patients]
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The differences in HbA1c concentration at 26 weeks between dulaglutide and insulin glargine treatments were LSM difference -0·05% (95% CI -0·26 to 0·15, p<0·0001) with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·02% (-0·18 to -0·22, p=0·0001) with dulaglutide 0·75 mg.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with T2D and chronic kidney disease, dulaglutide 0.75 mg was non-inferior to insulin glargine for HbA1c reduction.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, dulaglutide 0.75 mg met the non-inferiority criterion versus insulin glargine for HbA1c reduction.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedHbA1c change at 26 weeks
    Study

    n = 180

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg weekly · 26 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    HbA1c change
    −1.1%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    HbA1c change
    −1.1%
    insulin glargine, 26 weeks
    HbA1c difference versus insulin glargine
    0.02%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg minus insulin glargine, 26 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    -1·1% [0·1] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg [180 patients]
    Summary
    -1·1% [0·1] with insulin glargine [186 patients]
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The effects on HbA1c change at 26 weeks of dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·75 mg were non-inferior to those of insulin glargine
    Summary · context
    The differences in HbA1c concentration at 26 weeks between dulaglutide and insulin glargine treatments were LSM difference -0·05% (95% CI -0·26 to 0·15, p<0·0001) with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·02% (-0·18 to -0·22, p=0·0001) with dulaglutide 0·75 mg.
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with T2D and chronic kidney disease, eGFR was higher with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, kidney filtration was higher with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseeGFR
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Kidney function · Kidney and urinary
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg weekly · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    eGFR (CKD-EPI cystatin C, geometric LSM)
    34 mL/min per 1.73 m²
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 52 weeks
    eGFR (CKD-EPI cystatin C, geometric LSM)
    31.3 mL/min per 1.73 m²
    insulin glargine, 52 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At 52 weeks, eGFR was higher with dulaglutide 1·5 mg (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation by cystatin C geometric LSM 34·0 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [SE 0·7]; p=0·005 vs insulin glargine)
    Summary
    than with insulin glargine (31·3 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [0·7]).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with T2D and chronic kidney disease, eGFR was higher with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, kidney filtration was higher with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseeGFR
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Kidney function · Kidney and urinary
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg weekly · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    eGFR (CKD-EPI cystatin C, geometric LSM)
    33.8 mL/min per 1.73 m²
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg, 52 weeks
    eGFR (CKD-EPI cystatin C, geometric LSM)
    31.3 mL/min per 1.73 m²
    insulin glargine, 52 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and dulaglutide 0·75 mg (33·8 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [0·7]; p=0·009 vs insulin glargine) than with insulin glargine (31·3 mL/min per 1·73 m2 [0·7]).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with T2D and chronic kidney disease, UACR reduction with dulaglutide 1.5 mg did not differ significantly from insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, urinary albumin reduction with dulaglutide 1.5 mg did not differ significantly from insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    No significant changeUACR reduction
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Kidney function · Kidney and urinary
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg weekly · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    UACR change
    −22.5%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    UACR change
    −13%
    insulin glargine, 52 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At 52 weeks, the effects of dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·75 mg on UACR reduction were not significantly different from that of insulin glargine (LSM -22·5% [95% CI -35·1 to -7·5] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg; -20·1% [-33·1 to -4·6] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg; -13·0% [-27·1 to 3·9] with insulin glargine).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with T2D and chronic kidney disease, UACR reduction with dulaglutide 0.75 mg did not differ significantly from insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, urinary albumin reduction with dulaglutide 0.75 mg did not differ significantly from insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    No significant changeUACR reduction
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Kidney function · Kidney and urinary
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg weekly · 52 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    UACR change
    −20.1%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    UACR change
    −13%
    insulin glargine, 52 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    At 52 weeks, the effects of dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 0·75 mg on UACR reduction were not significantly different from that of insulin glargine (LSM -22·5% [95% CI -35·1 to -7·5] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg; -20·1% [-33·1 to -4·6] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg; -13·0% [-27·1 to 3·9] with insulin glargine).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, serious adverse event proportions were similar with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, serious adverse event proportions were similar with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSerious adverse events
    Study

    n = 192

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Serious adverse events
    20%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Serious adverse events
    27%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Proportions of patients with any serious adverse events were similar across groups (20% [38 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 24% [45 of 190] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 27% [52 of 194] with insulin glargine).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, nausea was more frequent with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, nausea was more frequent with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea
    Study

    n = 192

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Nausea
    20%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Nausea
    5%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Dulaglutide was associated with higher rates of nausea (20% [38 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 14% [27 of 190] with 0·75 mg, vs 5% [nine of 194] with insulin glargine)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, diarrhoea was more frequent with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, diarrhoea was more frequent with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseDiarrhoea
    Study

    n = 192

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Diarrhoea
    17%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Diarrhoea
    7%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and diarrhoea (17% [33 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 16% [30 of 190] with 0·75 mg, vs 7% [14 of 194] with insulin glargine)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, symptomatic hypoglycaemia rates were lower with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, low-blood-sugar rates were lower with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    DecreaseSymptomatic hypoglycaemia
    Study

    n = 192

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Symptomatic hypoglycaemia
    4.4 events per patient per year
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    Symptomatic hypoglycaemia
    9.6 events per patient per year
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and lower rates of symptomatic hypoglycaemia (4·4 events per patient per year with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 4·3 with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, vs 9·6 with insulin glargine).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, end-stage renal disease occurred in 4% with dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus 8% with insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, end-stage renal disease occurred in 4% with dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus 8% with insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedEnd-stage renal disease
    Study

    n = 192

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Kidney function · Kidney and urinary
    Studied dose
    1.5 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    End-stage renal disease
    4%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg
    End-stage renal disease
    8%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    End-stage renal disease occurred in 38 participants: eight (4%) of 192 with dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 14 (7%) of 190 with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 16 (8%) of 194 with insulin glargine.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  12. 12HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, serious adverse event proportions were similar with dulaglutide 0.75 mg and insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, serious adverse event proportions were similar with dulaglutide 0.75 mg and insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    No significant changeSerious adverse events
    Study

    n = 190

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Serious adverse events
    24%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    Serious adverse events
    27%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Proportions of patients with any serious adverse events were similar across groups (20% [38 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 24% [45 of 190] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 27% [52 of 194] with insulin glargine).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  13. 13HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, nausea was more frequent with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, nausea was more frequent with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea
    Study

    n = 190

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Nausea
    14%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    Nausea
    5%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Dulaglutide was associated with higher rates of nausea (20% [38 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 14% [27 of 190] with 0·75 mg, vs 5% [nine of 194] with insulin glargine)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  14. 14HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, diarrhoea was more frequent with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, diarrhoea was more frequent with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    IncreaseDiarrhoea
    Study

    n = 190

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Diarrhoea
    16%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    Diarrhoea
    7%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and diarrhoea (17% [33 of 192] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 16% [30 of 190] with 0·75 mg, vs 7% [14 of 194] with insulin glargine)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  15. 15HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, symptomatic hypoglycaemia rates were lower with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, low-blood-sugar rates were lower with dulaglutide 0.75 mg than insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    DecreaseSymptomatic hypoglycaemia
    Study

    n = 190

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Symptomatic hypoglycaemia
    4.3 events per patient per year
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    Symptomatic hypoglycaemia
    9.6 events per patient per year
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and lower rates of symptomatic hypoglycaemia (4·4 events per patient per year with dulaglutide 1·5 mg and 4·3 with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, vs 9·6 with insulin glargine).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.
  16. 16HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, end-stage renal disease occurred in 7% with dulaglutide 0.75 mg versus 8% with insulin glargine.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, end-stage renal disease occurred in 7% with dulaglutide 0.75 mg versus 8% with insulin glargine.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedEnd-stage renal disease
    Study

    n = 190

    Comparator
    Insulin glargine
    Outcome group
    Kidney function · Kidney and urinary
    Studied dose
    0.75 mg weeklyAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    End-stage renal disease
    7%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg
    End-stage renal disease
    8%
    insulin glargine

    Source sentences

    Summary
    End-stage renal disease occurred in 38 participants: eight (4%) of 192 with dulaglutide 1·5 mg, 14 (7%) of 190 with dulaglutide 0·75 mg, and 16 (8%) of 194 with insulin glargine.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  1. 17HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In patients with T2D and kidney disease, HbA1c lowering persisted through 52 weeks in both dulaglutide groups and the insulin glargine group.

    In plain wordsIn patients with T2D and kidney disease, HbA1c remained below baseline with both dulaglutide doses and insulin glargine through 52 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreaseHbA1c change at 52 weeks
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Baseline
    Outcome group
    Glycemic control · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    HbA1c change
    −1.1%
    dulaglutide 1.5 mg, 52 weeks
    HbA1c change
    −1.1%
    dulaglutide 0.75 mg, 52 weeks
    HbA1c change
    −1%
    insulin glargine, 52 weeks

    Source sentences

    Summary
    HbA1c-lowering effects persisted to 52 weeks (LSM -1·1% [SE 0·1] with dulaglutide 1·5 mg; -1·1% [0·1] with dulaglutide 0·75 mg; -1·0% [0·1] with insulin glargine).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by use of a computer-generated random sequence with an interactive response system to once-weekly injectable dulaglutide 1·5 mg, once-weekly dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily insulin glargine as basal therapy, all in combination with insulin lispro, for 52 weeks.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT01621178

A Study Comparing Dulaglutide With Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) and Moderate or Severe Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD)

Eli Lilly and Companyn = 577Jul 2012 to Dec 2016

Type 2 Diabetes · Chronic Kidney Disease

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 19 Sept 2019

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 2Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.