Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
| Group | Value (Percentage of HbA1c) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | -0.643 | 0.215 |
| Placebo | 0.415 | 0.216 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name Ellipse™
United States, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Denmark, Egypt, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Israel, Italy, Lebanon, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, Netherlands, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, Serbia
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This trial is conducted globally. The aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in the paediatric population in order to potentially address the unmet need for treatment of children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes.
Experimental
Lira + Met
Placebo comparator
Placebo + Met
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
Time frame · Week 0, week 26
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the primary analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame · Week 0, week 26
Change in FPG from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
Time frame · Week 26
Percentage of subjects having HbA1c \<7.0%. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
Time frame · Week 0, week 26
Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 26. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the world health organisation (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
Time frame · Week 52
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.0% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
Time frame · Week 26
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<=6.5% after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
Time frame · Week 52
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<=6.5% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame · Week 26
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.0% without severe or minor hypoglycaemic episodes after 26 weeks. Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemia was defined as meeting either of the below criteria: 1. an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject him/herself 2. any asymptomatic blood glucose value \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time frame · Week 52
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.0% without severe or minor hypoglycaemic episodes after 52 weeks. Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemia was defined as meeting either of the below criteria: 1. an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject him/herself 2. any asymptomatic blood glucose value \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
Time frame · Week 26
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.5% after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
Time frame · Week 52
Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.5% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change in HbA1c
Time frame · Week 0, week 52
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change in FPG
Time frame · Week 0, week 52
Change in FPG from baseline to week 52. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Mean 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose
Time frame · Week 0, week 26
Change in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose after 26 weeks. Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point SMPG was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by time. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose
Time frame · Week 0, week 52
Change in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose after 52 weeks. Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point SMPG was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by time. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Time frame · Week 0, week 26
Change in post-prandial increments (from before meal to 90 min after breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 26 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Time frame · Week 0, week 52
Change in post-prandial increments (from before meal to 90 min after breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 52 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Time frame · Week 0, week 26
Change in mean post-prandial increment across all three meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 26 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Time frame · Week 0, week 52
Change in mean post-prandial increment across all three meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 52 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame · Week 0, week 26
Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame · Week 0, week 52
Change from baseline in body weight after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Percentage of HbA1c) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | -0.643 | 0.215 |
| Placebo | 0.415 | 0.216 |
| Group | Value (mmol/L) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | -1.076 | 0.436 |
| Placebo | 0.801 | 0.449 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of subjects) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | 63.7 |
| Placebo | 36.5 |
| Group | Value (SDS score) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | -0.254 | 0.039 |
| Placebo | -0.208 | 0.039 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | 27 |
| Placebo | 16 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | 28 |
| Placebo | 19 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | 25 |
| Placebo | 13 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg | 31 |
| Placebo | 21 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 1.8 mgAfter the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52). | 0 / 66 | 9 / 66 | 45 / 66 |
| PlaceboAfter the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period. | 0 / 68 | 4 / 68 | 49 / 68 |
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52), were followed-up at week 104. | 0 / 52 | 7 / 52 | 7 / 52 |
| Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52), were followed-up at week 156. | 0 / 48 | 2 / 48 | 1 / 48 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
2 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2021
Bensignor et al. 2021Pediatric obesitycited by 22
PMID 33634589PMC8277686DOI 10.1111/ijpo.12778PUB-33634589
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2019
Tamborlane et al. 2019The New England journal of medicinecited by 272
PMID 31034184DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1903822PUB-31034184
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated