Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight
| Group | Value (percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | -7.98 | 6.67 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | -2.62 | 5.74 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataUnited States, Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Russia, Serbia and Montenegro, Serbia, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Effect of Liraglutide on Body Weight in Non-diabetic Obese Subjects or Overweight Subjects With Co-morbidities: SCALE™ - Obesity and Pre-diabetes
NCT012722191 Jun 2011 to 2 Mar 2015
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania, North America and South America. The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the potential of liraglutide to induce and maintain weight loss over 56 weeks in obese subjects or overweight subjects with co-morbidities. Furthermore, the aim is to investigate the long term potential of liraglutide to delay the onset of type 2 diabetes in subjects diagnosed with pre-diabetes at baseline. Based on body mass index (BMI) and pre-diabetes status, subjects will be randomised to either 68 weeks (56 weeks of randomised treatment followed by a 12 week re-randomised treatment period) or 160 weeks of treatment (160 week treatment will only be applicable to subjects with pre-diabetes status at baseline).
Experimental
Liraglutide 3.0mg (week0-56)/Liraglutide 3.0mg (week56-68)
Experimental
Liraglutide 3.0mg (week0-56)/Liraglutide Placebo (week56-68)
Placebo comparator
Liraglutide Placebo, no Pre-diabetes
Experimental
Liraglutide 3.0mg, Pre-diabetes
Placebo comparator
Liraglutide Placebo, Pre-diabetes
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight
Time frame · Week 0, Week 56
The observed mean change from baseline in fasting body weight (%) after 56-weeks of treatment (main treatment period).
Proportion of Subjects Losing at Least 5% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight.
Time frame · At Week 56
Percentage of subjects losing at least 5% of baseline fasting body weight after 56-weeks of treatment (main treatment period).
Proportion of Subjects Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight
Time frame · At 56 weeks
Percentage of subjects losing \>10% of baseline fasting body weight after 56-weeks of treatment (main treatment period).
Proportion of Subjects With Onset of Type 2 Diabetes
Time frame · At 160 weeks
Proportion of subjects with onset of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at week 160 (main + extension treatment period) among subjects with pre-diabetes at baseline - evaluated as time to onset of T2DM. Subjects included in FAS, who were stratified to 160-weeks of treatment (i.e., excluding 37 subjects with pre-diabetes who entered the re-randomised period and including 6 subjects without pre-diabetes incorrectly stratified to the 160-week treatment period).
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference (cm)
Time frame · Week 0, Week 56
The observed mean change from baseline in waist circumference (cm) after 56-weeks of treatment (main treatment period).
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame · Week 0, week 160
The observed mean change from baseline in waist circumference (subjects with pre-diabetes at baseline) after 160 weeks of treatment (main + extension treatment period). Subjects included in FAS, who were stratified to 160-weeks of treatment (i.e., excluding 37 subjects with pre-diabetes who entered the re-randomised period and including 6 subjects without pre-diabetes incorrectly stratified to the 160-week treatment period).
Pre-diabetes Status After 56 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame · Week 0, Week 56
Observed percentage of subjects with pre-diabetes status after 56 weeks of treatment (main treatment period).
Pre-diabetes Status in Subject With Pre-diabetes at Baseline After 160 Weeks of Treatment
Time frame · Week 0, week 160
Observed percentage of subjects (subjects with pre-diabetes at baseline) with pre-diabetes status after 160 weeks of treatment (main + extension treatment period). Subjects included in FAS, who were stratified to 160-weeks of treatment (i.e., excluding 37 subjects with pre-diabetes who entered the re-randomised period and including 6 subjects without pre-diabetes incorrectly stratified to the 160-week treatment period).
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame · Week 0, week 160
The observed mean change from baseline in fasting body weight (subjects with pre-diabetes at baseline) after 160 weeks of treatment (main + extension treatment period). Subjects included in FAS, who were stratified to 160-weeks of treatment (i.e., excluding 37 subjects with pre-diabetes who entered the re-randomised period and including 6 subjects without pre-diabetes incorrectly stratified to the 160-week treatment period).
Proportion of Subjects Losing at Least 5% and Proportion of Subjects Losing More Than 10% of Baseline Fasting Body Weight (Subjects With Pre-diabetes at Baseline)
Time frame · At 160 weeks
Percentage of subjects losing \>=5% and percentage of subjects losing \>10% of baseline fasting body weight (pre-diabetic subjects at baseline) after 160-weeks of treatment (main + extension treatment period). Subjects included in FAS, who were stratified to 160-weeks of treatment (i.e., excluding 37 subjects with pre-diabetes who entered the re-randomised period and including 6 subjects without pre-diabetes incorrectly stratified to the 160-week treatment period).
Change From Week 56 in Fasting Body Weight (%) (Re-randomised Subjects With No Pre-diabetes)
Time frame · Week 56, Week 68
The observed mean change in fasting body weight (%) from week 56 to week 68 in re-randomised subjects (with no pre-diabetes at baseline) after 12-weeks of treatment (re-randomised treatment period).
Change From Baseline in Fasting Body Weight (%) (Re-randomised Subjects With No Pre-diabetes)
Time frame · Week 0, Week 68
The observed mean change from baseline in fasting body weight (%) in re-randomised subjects (with no pre-diabetes at baseline) after 68 weeks of treatment (main + re-randomised treatment period).
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | -7.98 | 6.67 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | -2.62 | 5.74 |
| Group | Value (percentage of subjects) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | 63.2 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | 27.1 |
| Group | Value (percentage of subjects) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | 33.1 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | 10.6 |
| Group | Value (Subject) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (160-Week) | 26 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (160-Week) | 46 |
| Group | Value (cm) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | -8.19 | 7.31 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | -3.94 | 6.58 |
| Group | Value (cm) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (160-Week) | -6.87 | 8.28 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (160-Week) | -3.37 | 7.47 |
| Group | Value (percentage of subjects) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (56-Week) | 78.3 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (56-Week) | 50.9 |
| Group | Value (percentage of subjects) |
|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg (160-Week) | 65.9 |
| Liraglutide Placebo (160-Week) | 36.3 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg, Pre-diabetesArm 3: Subjects with pre-diabetes at screening received liraglutide 3.0 mg, once daily (OD) subcutaneously (s.c. injection, under the skin) for initial 56 weeks then continued treatment till 160 weeks, followed by an off-drug, observational follow-up period of 12 weeks. The total duration of this treatment arm from randomisation to follow-up was 172 weeks. | – | 230 / 1524 | 1342 / 1524 |
| Liraglutide Placebo, Pre-diabetesArm 4: Subjects with pre-diabetes at screening received liraglutide placebo once daily (OD) subcutaneously (s.c. injection, under the skin) for initial 56 weeks then continued treatment till 160 weeks, followed by an off-drug, observational follow-up period of 12 weeks. The total duration of this treatment arm from randomisation to follow-up was 172 weeks. | – | 96 / 755 | 586 / 755 |
| Liraglutide 3.0 mg, no Pre-diabetesArm 1 (Arm 1A + Arm 1B): Subjects with no pre-diabetes at screening received liraglutide 3.0 mg, once daily (OD) subcutaneously (s.c. injection, under the skin) for 56 weeks followed by a re-randomisation (1:1 into liraglutide 3.0 mg or liraglutide placebo) period of 12 weeks (weeks 56-68) and then an off-drug follow-up period of 2 weeks. The total duration of this treatment arm from randomisation to follow-up was 70 weeks. | – | 59 / 957 | 843 / 957 |
| Liraglutide Placebo, no Pre-diabetesArm 2: Subjects with no pre-diabetes at screening received liraglutide placebo once daily (OD) subcutaneously (s.c. injection, under the skin) for 56 weeks and then continued with liraglutide placebo for additional 12 weeks (weeks 56-68), followed by a 2 weeks off-drug follow-up period. The total duration of this treatment arm from randomisation to follow-up was 70 weeks. | – | 19 / 487 | 345 / 487 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
11 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Meta-analysis (pooled) · 2018
Davies et al. 2018Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 80
PMID 28950422PMC5836948DOI 10.1111/dom.13125PUB-28950422
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018
Kolotkin et al. 2018Clinical obesitycited by 32
PMID 29045079PMC5813214DOI 10.1111/cob.12226PUB-29045079
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017
von Scholten et al. 2017Journal of diabetes and its complicationscited by 6
PMID 28462892DOI 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2017.04.003PUB-28462892
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017
le Roux et al. 2017Obesity factscited by 28
PMID 29145215PMC5836203DOI 10.1159/000478099PUB-29145215
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
Ard et al. 2016Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 33
PMID 26744025PMC6084344DOI 10.1111/dom.12632PUB-26744025
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
Wilding et al. 2016Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 74
PMID 26833744PMC5069568DOI 10.1111/dom.12639PUB-26833744
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
Overgaard et al. 2016Clinical pharmacokineticscited by 44
PMID 27193270PMC5069304DOI 10.1007/s40262-016-0410-7PUB-27193270
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
Kolotkin et al. 2016Clinical obesitycited by 30
PMID 27198973PMC5084798DOI 10.1111/cob.12146PUB-27198973
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
O'Neil et al. 2016Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologistscited by 18
PMID 27482610DOI 10.4158/ep151181.orPUB-27482610
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
Fujioka et al. 2016Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.)cited by 101
PMID 27804269PMC5129670DOI 10.1002/oby.21629PUB-27804269
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2015
Pi-Sunyer et al. 2015The New England journal of medicinecited by 1,954
PMID 26132939DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1411892PUB-26132939
5 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Review · 2022
Williams et al. 2022TouchREVIEWS in endocrinologycited by 6
PMID 35975210PMC9354511DOI 10.17925/ee.2022.18.1.43PUB-35975210
PubMed tag: none · 2017
Bays et al. 2017Current medical research and opinioncited by 38
PMID 27817208DOI 10.1080/03007995.2016.1251892PUB-27817208
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017
le Roux et al. 2017Lancet (London, England)cited by 618
PMID 28237263DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30069-7PUB-28237263
PubMed tag: none · 2017
O'Neil et al. 2017Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 93
PMID 28386912PMC5655710DOI 10.1111/dom.12963PUB-28386912
Indexing hint: Review · 2016
McEvoy et al. 2016Journal of biopharmaceutical statisticscited by 23
PMID 26418188DOI 10.1080/10543406.2015.1094814PUB-26418188
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated