Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | 90.0 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | 91.0 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataUnited States, Canada
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Radiation Therapy With or Without Androgen-Deprivation Therapy in Treating Patients With Prostate Cancer
NCT00936390Sept 2009 to 4 Sept 2025
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other types of radiation to kill tumor cells and shrink tumors. Androgens can cause the growth of prostate cancer cells. Androgen-deprivation therapy may lessen the amount of androgens made by the body. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy is more effective with or without androgen-deprivation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy to see how well it works compared with radiation therapy given together with androgen-deprivation therapy in treating patients with prostate cancer.
Active comparator
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone
Radiation therapy consists of 79.2 Gy EBRT only or 45 Gy EBRT followed by low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy. EBRT is delivered in 1.8 Gy daily fractions.
Experimental
Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation
Radiation therapy consists of 79.2 Gy EBRT only or 45 Gy EBRT followed by low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy. EBRT is delivered in 1.8 Gy daily fractions. Six months of androgen-deprivation therapy starts 8 weeks prior to start of radiation therapy and consists of luteinizing-hormone releasing-hormone (LHRH) agonist (antagonist) therapy (leuprolide, goserelin, buserelin. triptorelin, or degarelix) and anti-androgen therapy (bicalutamide or flutamide).
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival)
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.
Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Failure
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.
Biochemical failure is defined as an increase of at least 2 ng/ml above the nadir PSA. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Local Recurrence
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.
Local recurrence (failure) is defined as clinical (palpable) suspicion of local recurrence \[this date is used\] confirmed by biopsy. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Percentage of Participants With Regional Recurrence
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years.
Regional recurrence is defined as the documented progression in pelvic lymph nodes. If discovered on image of the pelvis prompted by a biochemical failure, then the event date would be the date of documented biochemical failure.
Percentage of Participants With Distant Metastasis
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.
Distant metastasis (failure) is defined as metastatic disease documented by any method. If diagnosed on diagnostic imaging prompted by biochemical failure, then the event date will be the date of biochemical progression. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (competing risk), or death without failure (censored). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Prostate Cancer (Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.
Prostate cancer specific mortality (failure) is defined as death due to prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Percentage of Participants Dead Due to Cause Other Than Prostate Cancer (Non-Prostate Cancer-specific Mortality)
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.
Non-prostate cancer specific mortality is defined as a death without evidence of prostate cancer or a complication from treatment. . Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Percentage of Participants Receiving Salvage Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT)
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.
Salvage (non-protocol) ADT administration is defined as the first administration of subsequent ADT (either LHRH agonist or anti-androgen) Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Salvage ADT rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of salvage ADT times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Percentage of Participants Alive (Overall Survival) by Radiation Therapy Modality
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates reported here.
Overall survival time is defined as time from randomization to the date of death from any cause or last known follow-up (censored). Overall survival rates are estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Number of Participants With Acute Adverse Events
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years.
Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Acute adverse events are defined as occuring within 30 days of completion of radiation therapy.
Percentage of Participants With Late Grade 3+ Adverse Events
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0) grades adverse event severity from 1=mild to 5=death. Summary data is provided in this outcome measure; see Adverse Events Module for specific adverse event data. Late adverse events are defined as occurring more than 30 days after the end of radiation therapy. Failure is defined as grade 3 or higher late adverse event. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Percentage of Participants Failed (Freedom From Failure)
Time frame · From randomization to last follow-up. Follow-up schedule: end of RT (2nd arm only), then every 3 months for a year, every 4 months for 4 years, then yearly. Maximum follow-up at time of analysis was 10.3 years. Five-year rates are reported here.
Failure is defined as biochemical failure, local failure, or distant metastasis. Failure time is defined as time from randomization to the date of first failure, last known follow-up (censored), or death without failure (competing risk). Failure rates are estimated using the cumulative incidence method. The protocol specifies that the distributions of failure times be compared between the arms, which is reported in the statistical analysis results. Five-year rates are provided here. Analysis was planned to occur after 218 deaths were reported.
Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Urinary Domain Score
Time frame · Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.
The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Bowel Domain Score
Time frame · Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.
The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Hormonal Domain Score
Time frame · Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.
The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score
Time frame · Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.
The EPIC assesses disease-specific aspects of prostate cancer and it's therapies and consists of four summary domains (bowel, urinary, sexual, and hormonal), each ranging from 0-100, with higher scores representing better health-related quality of life. Change is calculated as time point value - baseline value, such that a positive change indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Domain Score
Time frame · Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.
The PROMIS Fatigue short form 8a contains 8 questions, each with 5 responses ranging from 1 to 5, evaluating self-reported fatigue symptoms over the past 7 days. The total score is the sum of all questions which is then converted into a pro-rated T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10, with a possible range of 33.1 to 77.8. Higher scores indicate more fatigue. Change is defined as value at one year - value at baseline. Positive change from baseline indicates increased fatigue at one year.
Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs)
Time frame · Last week of RT (approximately 9 and 17 weeks from start of protocol treatment for Arm 1 and 2, respectively), then 6 months, 1 year and 5 years from end of RT.
Correlation Between PROMIS Fatigue Score Change and Plasma Cytokine Change
Time frame · From date of randomization to 3 weeks from start of RT.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | 90.0 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | 91.0 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | 13.9 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | 7.7 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | 2.6 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | 0.6 |
| Group | Value |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | not posted |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | not posted |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | 3.1 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | 0.6 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | 0.90 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | 0 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | 9.1 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | 9.0 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy Alone | 6.1 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-Deprivation | 4.2 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy AloneRadiation therapy consists of 79.2 Gy EBRT only or 45 Gy EBRT followed by low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy. EBRT is delivered in 1.8 Gy daily fractions. | 119 / 750 | 20 / 733 | 597 / 733 |
| Dose-Escalated Radiation Therapy and Short-Term Androgen-DeprivationRadiation therapy consists of 79.2 Gy EBRT only or 45 Gy EBRT followed by low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy. EBRT is delivered in 1.8 Gy daily fractions. Six months of androgen-deprivation therapy starts 8 weeks prior to start of radiation therapy and consists of LHRH agonist (antagonist) therapy (leuprolide, goserelin, buserelin. triptorelin, or degarelix) and anti-androgen therapy (bicalutamide or flutamide). | 100 / 742 | 33 / 725 | 647 / 725 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated