Skip to content

Study · Systematic review · 2026

2 results

GLP-1 receptor agonists in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of preclinical and clinical evidence.

Sajjad M, Sajjad A, Amer R, Mirza SB

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders10 Jul 2026

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

2 results from studies that gave the peptide. 2 results from people.

  1. 01HumanSystematic reviewOther

    In the systematic review's pharmacovigilance analysis, semaglutide had an inverse reporting odds ratio of 0.238; the specific reported event and comparator were not stated.

    In plain wordsIn reviewed multiple-sclerosis pharmacovigilance data, semaglutide had inverse reporting odds; the event and comparator were unstated.

    Outcome
    DecreasePharmacovigilance reporting odds ratio
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    reporting odds ratio
    0.238
    semaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Pharmacovigilance showed inverse reporting odds ratios with semaglutide (ROR 0.238), dulaglutide (ROR 0.165), and liraglutide (ROR 0.161).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We conducted a PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD420261385854) following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
    Summary · context
    PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus were systematically searched to June 12, 2026.
    Summary · context
    Studies examining GLP-1RAs in confirmed MS patients, EAE animal models, or case reports were eligible.
    Summary · context
    Narrative synthesis followed SWiM guidelines.
    Summary · context
    Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria: eight preclinical animal studies (six EAE, two cuprizone models), four human observational studies, and three narrative-context studies.
  2. 02HumanSystematic reviewOther

    In the systematic review's pharmacovigilance analysis, liraglutide had an inverse reporting odds ratio of 0.161; the specific reported event and comparator were not stated.

    In plain wordsIn reviewed multiple-sclerosis pharmacovigilance data, liraglutide had inverse reporting odds; the event and comparator were unstated.

    Outcome
    DecreasePharmacovigilance reporting odds ratio
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Pharmacology
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    reporting odds ratio
    0.161
    liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Pharmacovigilance showed inverse reporting odds ratios with semaglutide (ROR 0.238), dulaglutide (ROR 0.165), and liraglutide (ROR 0.161).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    We conducted a PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD420261385854) following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
    Summary · context
    PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus were systematically searched to June 12, 2026.
    Summary · context
    Studies examining GLP-1RAs in confirmed MS patients, EAE animal models, or case reports were eligible.
    Summary · context
    Narrative synthesis followed SWiM guidelines.
    Summary · context
    Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria: eight preclinical animal studies (six EAE, two cuprizone models), four human observational studies, and three narrative-context studies.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.