Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2026

2 results

Prospective Comparative Analysis of Synchronous Abdominoplasty and Mastopexy in Bariatric and Nonbariatric Massive Weight Loss Patients: Highlighting the Rising Trend of GLP-1 Analog Use.

Menkü Özdemir FD, Uzun H

Annals of plastic surgery9 Feb 2026

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    Among 14 nonbariatric weight-loss patients using pooled GLP-1 analogs including liraglutide who underwent synchronous full abdominoplasty and mastopexy, no complications occurred.

    In plain wordsAmong 14 people using pooled GLP-1 analogs including liraglutide who had abdominoplasty and mastopexy, no complications occurred.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSurgical complications
    Study

    n = 14

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body

    Measurements

    Patients using GLP-1 receptor agonists
    14
    liraglutide or tirzepatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Notably, no complications occurred in patients who lost weight with GLP-1 analogs.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Forty-nine patients had undergone bariatric surgery, whereas 52 achieved weight loss without bariatric surgery, including 14 patients using GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide or tirzepatide).
    Summary · context
    Between January 2015 and August 2025, 101 consecutive weight-loss patients undergoing synchronous full abdominoplasty and mastopexy with a superomedial pedicle were prospectively enrolled.
    Summary · context
    Demographic characteristics, weight loss parameters, serum albumin levels, operative details, and complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo) were recorded.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Tirzepatide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    Among 14 nonbariatric weight-loss patients using pooled GLP-1 analogs including tirzepatide who underwent synchronous full abdominoplasty and mastopexy, no complications occurred.

    In plain wordsAmong 14 people using pooled GLP-1 analogs including tirzepatide who had abdominoplasty and mastopexy, no complications occurred.

    Outcome
    Not applicableSurgical complications
    Study

    n = 14

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body

    Measurements

    Patients using GLP-1 receptor agonists
    14
    liraglutide or tirzepatide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Notably, no complications occurred in patients who lost weight with GLP-1 analogs.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Forty-nine patients had undergone bariatric surgery, whereas 52 achieved weight loss without bariatric surgery, including 14 patients using GLP-1 receptor agonists (liraglutide or tirzepatide).
    Summary · context
    Between January 2015 and August 2025, 101 consecutive weight-loss patients undergoing synchronous full abdominoplasty and mastopexy with a superomedial pedicle were prospectively enrolled.
    Summary · context
    Demographic characteristics, weight loss parameters, serum albumin levels, operative details, and complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo) were recorded.

    In this study, Tirzepatide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Tirzepatide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:07 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.