Skip to content

Study · Observational study · n = 68,635 · 2025

14 results

Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular outcomes among adults with type 2 diabetes and moderate cardiovascular risk: emulation of a target trial.

Sklepinski SM, Deng Y, Swarna KS, Herrin J, Polley EC, Neumiller JJ, Galindo RJ, Umpierrez GE, Ross JS, Borah BJ, Maron BA, Mickelson MM, McCoy RG

Diabetes research and clinical practice20 Sept 2025Cited by 4 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study14

14 results from studies that gave the peptide. 14 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was associated with lower MACE risk than dulaglutide (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.93).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was linked to lower major cardiovascular event risk than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMajor adverse cardiovascular events
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.85
    native drug versus dulaglutide
    95% CI
    0.78 to 0.93
    reported IPTW comparison

    Source sentences

    Summary
    semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78-0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87-0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71-0.92), stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70-0.97), and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88-0.99)
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021.
    Summary · context
    Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models.
    Summary · context
    Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide.
  2. 02HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was associated with lower expanded MACE risk than dulaglutide (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.96).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was linked to lower expanded cardiovascular event risk than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseExpanded major adverse cardiovascular events
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.92
    native drug versus dulaglutide
    95% CI
    0.87 to 0.96
    reported IPTW comparison

    Source sentences

    Summary
    semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78-0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87-0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71-0.92), stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70-0.97), and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88-0.99)
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021.
    Summary · context
    Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models.
    Summary · context
    Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide.
  3. 03HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was associated with lower all-cause mortality than dulaglutide (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.92).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was linked to lower mortality than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAll-cause mortality
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.81
    native drug versus dulaglutide
    95% CI
    0.71 to 0.92
    reported IPTW comparison

    Source sentences

    Summary
    semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78-0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87-0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71-0.92), stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70-0.97), and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88-0.99)
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021.
    Summary · context
    Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models.
    Summary · context
    Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide.
  4. 04HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was associated with lower stroke risk than dulaglutide (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.7 to 0.97).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was linked to lower stroke risk than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseStroke
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.82
    native drug versus dulaglutide
    95% CI
    0.7 to 0.97
    reported IPTW comparison

    Source sentences

    Summary
    semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78-0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87-0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71-0.92), stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70-0.97), and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88-0.99)
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021.
    Summary · context
    Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models.
    Summary · context
    Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide.
  5. 05HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was associated with lower revascularization risk than dulaglutide (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.88 to 0.99).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, semaglutide was linked to lower revascularization risk than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseRevascularization
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.93
    native drug versus dulaglutide
    95% CI
    0.88 to 0.99
    reported IPTW comparison

    Source sentences

    Summary
    semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78-0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87-0.96), all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71-0.92), stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70-0.97), and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88-0.99)
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021.
    Summary · context
    Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models.
    Summary · context
    Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide.
  6. 06HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk, dulaglutide was linked to higher MACE risk than semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, dulaglutide was linked to higher major cardiovascular event risk than semaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMACE versus semaglutide
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Semaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio, MACE
    0.85 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide
    95% CI of hazard ratio, MACE
    0.78 to 0.93 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78-0.93)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of…
  7. 07HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk, dulaglutide was linked to higher expanded MACE risk than semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, dulaglutide was linked to higher expanded cardiovascular event risk than semaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseExpanded MACE
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Semaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio, Expanded MACE
    0.92 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide
    95% CI of hazard ratio, Expanded MACE
    0.87 to 0.96 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.85, 95CI % 0.78-0.93), expanded MACE (HR 0.92, 95CI % 0.87-0.96)
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of…
  8. 08HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk, dulaglutide was linked to higher all-cause mortality than semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, dulaglutide was linked to higher death risk than semaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAll-cause mortality versus semaglutide
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Semaglutide
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio, All-cause mortality
    0.81 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide
    95% CI of hazard ratio, All-cause mortality
    0.71 to 0.92 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    all-cause mortality (HR 0.81, 95CI % 0.71-0.92)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of…
  9. 09HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk, dulaglutide was linked to higher stroke risk than semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, dulaglutide was linked to higher stroke risk than semaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseStroke
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Semaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio, Stroke
    0.82 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide
    95% CI of hazard ratio, Stroke
    0.7 to 0.97 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    stroke (HR 0.82, 95CI % 0.70-0.97)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of…
  10. 10HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk, dulaglutide was linked to higher revascularization risk than semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, dulaglutide was linked to more procedures to restore blood flow than semaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseRevascularization
    Study

    n = 68,635

    Comparator
    Semaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio, Revascularization
    0.93 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide
    95% CI of hazard ratio, Revascularization
    0.88 to 0.99 ratio
    semaglutide versus dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and revascularization (HR 0.93, 95CI % 0.88-0.99)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of…
  11. 11HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, liraglutide was associated with lower MACE risk than dulaglutide (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.97).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, liraglutide was linked to lower major cardiovascular event risk than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseMajor adverse cardiovascular events
    Study

    n = 44,415

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.84
    native drug versus dulaglutide
    95% CI
    0.72 to 0.97
    reported IPTW comparison

    Source sentences

    Summary
    while liraglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.84, 95CI % 0.72-0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95CI % 0.64-0.99).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021.
    Summary · context
    Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models.
    Summary · context
    Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide.
  12. 12HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, liraglutide was associated with lower all-cause mortality than dulaglutide (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.99).

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk, liraglutide was linked to lower mortality than dulaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAll-cause mortality
    Study

    n = 44,415

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio
    0.79
    native drug versus dulaglutide
    95% CI
    0.64 to 0.99
    reported IPTW comparison

    Source sentences

    Summary
    while liraglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.84, 95CI % 0.72-0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95CI % 0.64-0.99).
    5 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021.
    Summary · context
    Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox models.
    Summary · context
    Outcomes were time to composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE: myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality), expanded MACE (MACE, hospitalization for heart failure, and revascularization) and its components, and severe hypoglycemia.
    Summary · context
    After IPTW, 35,572 patients initiated dulaglutide, 4376 initiated exenatide, 8843 initiated liraglutide, and 33,063 initiated semaglutide.
  13. 13HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk, dulaglutide was linked to higher MACE risk than liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, dulaglutide was linked to higher major cardiovascular event risk than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseMACE versus liraglutide
    Study

    n = 44,415

    Comparator
    Liraglutide
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio, MACE
    0.84 ratio
    liraglutide versus dulaglutide
    95% CI of hazard ratio, MACE
    0.72 to 0.97 ratio
    liraglutide versus dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    while liraglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.84, 95CI % 0.72-0.97)
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of…
  14. 14HumanObservational studyEfficacy outcome

    In adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk, dulaglutide was linked to higher all-cause mortality than liraglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with diabetes, dulaglutide was linked to higher death risk than liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseAll-cause mortality versus liraglutide
    Study

    n = 44,415

    Comparator
    Liraglutide
    Outcome group
    Mortality · Whole body
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Measurements

    Hazard ratio, All-cause mortality
    0.79 ratio
    liraglutide versus dulaglutide
    95% CI of hazard ratio, All-cause mortality
    0.64 to 0.99 ratio
    liraglutide versus dulaglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    while liraglutide was associated with lower risk of MACE (HR 0.84, 95CI % 0.72-0.97) and all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95CI % 0.64-0.99).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Compared to dulaglutide, semaglutide
    Summary · context
    We emulated a target trial using claims data of adults with T2D at moderate cardiovascular risk who initiated dulaglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, or semaglutide between 01/01/2014-12/31/2021. Random treatment assignment was emulated by propensity scores and incorporated into inverse probability of…

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Versions 5 to 10Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:03 UTC

    The same notice was added 6 times, first on 22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC. The status did not change between them.

    Study results updated

  2. Version 4

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 3

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  4. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  5. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.