Skip to content

Study · Observational study · 2025

25 results

Real-world safety comparison of liraglutide and semaglutide in weight management: Insights from European pharmacovigilance data.

Ruggiero R, Longo M, Mascolo A, Di Nuzzo M, Laino LV, Caruso P, D'Amato R, Rafaniello C, Maiorino MI, Esposito K, Capuano A

European journal of pharmacology25 Jul 2025Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC-ND. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study25

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In European pharmacovigilance reports for weight management, liraglutide was associated with higher reported pancreatitis frequency; the abstract did not specify the original reporting reference.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management safety reports, liraglutide was linked to higher pancreatitis reporting; the exact reporting comparison was unstated.

    Outcome
    Increasepancreatitis reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Disproportionality analysis revealed that liraglutide was associated with a higher reporting frequency of pancreatitis, gallbladder disorders, and thyroid tumors, while semaglutide showed a greater likelihood of vomiting and abdominal pain.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.
  2. 02HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In European pharmacovigilance reports for weight management, liraglutide was associated with higher reported gallbladder disorders frequency; the abstract did not specify the original reporting reference.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management safety reports, liraglutide was linked to higher gallbladder disorders reporting; the exact reporting comparison was unstated.

    Outcome
    Increasegallbladder disorder reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Disproportionality analysis revealed that liraglutide was associated with a higher reporting frequency of pancreatitis, gallbladder disorders, and thyroid tumors, while semaglutide showed a greater likelihood of vomiting and abdominal pain.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.
  3. 03HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In European pharmacovigilance reports for weight management, liraglutide was associated with higher reported thyroid tumors frequency; the abstract did not specify the original reporting reference.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management safety reports, liraglutide was linked to higher thyroid tumors reporting; the exact reporting comparison was unstated.

    Outcome
    Increasethyroid tumor reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Cancer
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Disproportionality analysis revealed that liraglutide was associated with a higher reporting frequency of pancreatitis, gallbladder disorders, and thyroid tumors, while semaglutide showed a greater likelihood of vomiting and abdominal pain.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.
  4. 04HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In European pharmacovigilance reports for weight management, semaglutide was associated with higher reported vomiting frequency; the abstract did not specify the original reporting reference.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management safety reports, semaglutide was linked to higher vomiting reporting; the exact reporting comparison was unstated.

    Outcome
    Increasevomiting reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Disproportionality analysis revealed that liraglutide was associated with a higher reporting frequency of pancreatitis, gallbladder disorders, and thyroid tumors, while semaglutide showed a greater likelihood of vomiting and abdominal pain.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.
  5. 05HumanObservational studySafety outcome

    In European pharmacovigilance reports for weight management, semaglutide was associated with higher reported abdominal pain frequency; the abstract did not specify the original reporting reference.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management safety reports, semaglutide was linked to higher abdominal pain reporting; the exact reporting comparison was unstated.

    Outcome
    Increaseabdominal pain reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Disproportionality analysis revealed that liraglutide was associated with a higher reporting frequency of pancreatitis, gallbladder disorders, and thyroid tumors, while semaglutide showed a greater likelihood of vomiting and abdominal pain.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone20

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 06HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, no significant other common gastrointestinal events difference was reported; the exact original reporting comparison was unspecified.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, other gastrointestinal events showed no significant difference; the exact reporting comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    No significant changeother common gastrointestinal event reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences were found for other common gastrointestinal events, pancreatic tumors, depression, or suicidal ideation.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 07HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, no significant pancreatic tumors difference was reported; the exact original reporting comparison was unspecified.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, pancreatic tumors showed no significant difference; the exact reporting comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    No significant changepancreatic tumor reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Cancer

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences were found for other common gastrointestinal events, pancreatic tumors, depression, or suicidal ideation.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  3. 08HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, no significant depression difference was reported; the exact original reporting comparison was unspecified.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, depression showed no significant difference; the exact reporting comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    No significant changedepression reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Mental health and mood

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences were found for other common gastrointestinal events, pancreatic tumors, depression, or suicidal ideation.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  4. 09HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, no significant suicidal ideation difference was reported; the exact original reporting comparison was unspecified.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, suicidal ideation showed no significant difference; the exact reporting comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    No significant changesuicidal ideation reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Mental health and mood

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences were found for other common gastrointestinal events, pancreatic tumors, depression, or suicidal ideation.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  5. 10HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, most reported adverse events were non-serious.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, most adverse events were not serious.

    Outcome
    Not applicablenon-serious adverse events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Most reported AEs were not-serious.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  6. 11HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, most reported adverse events were non-serious.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, most adverse events were not serious.

    Outcome
    Not applicablenon-serious adverse events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Most reported AEs were not-serious.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  7. 12HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, gastrointestinal events were the most common adverse events.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, stomach and bowel events were most common.

    Outcome
    Not applicablegastrointestinal adverse events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal events were the most common, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea leading the list.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  8. 13HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, gastrointestinal events were the most common adverse events.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, stomach and bowel events were most common.

    Outcome
    Not applicablegastrointestinal adverse events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal events were the most common, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea leading the list.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  9. 14HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, nausea was among the most common gastrointestinal adverse events.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, nausea was among the most common stomach or bowel events.

    Outcome
    Not applicablenausea reports
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal events were the most common, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea leading the list.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  10. 15HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, nausea was among the most common gastrointestinal adverse events.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, nausea was among the most common stomach or bowel events.

    Outcome
    Not applicablenausea reports
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal events were the most common, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea leading the list.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  11. 16HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, vomiting was among the most common gastrointestinal adverse events.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, vomiting was among the most common stomach or bowel events.

    Outcome
    Not applicablevomiting reports
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal events were the most common, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea leading the list.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  12. 17HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, vomiting was among the most common gastrointestinal adverse events.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, vomiting was among the most common stomach or bowel events.

    Outcome
    Not applicablevomiting reports
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal events were the most common, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea leading the list.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  13. 18HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, diarrhea was among the most common gastrointestinal adverse events.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, diarrhea was among the most common stomach or bowel events.

    Outcome
    Not applicablediarrhea reports
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal events were the most common, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea leading the list.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  14. 19HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, diarrhea was among the most common gastrointestinal adverse events.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, diarrhea was among the most common stomach or bowel events.

    Outcome
    Not applicablediarrhea reports
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal events were the most common, with nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea leading the list.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  15. 20HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, two events were related to gallbladder tumors.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, two reports concerned gallbladder tumors.

    Outcome
    Not applicablegallbladder tumor reports
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Cancer

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Two events were related to gallbladder tumors.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  16. 21HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European pharmacovigilance reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide for weight management, two events were related to gallbladder tumors.

    In plain wordsIn pooled weight-management safety reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, two reports concerned gallbladder tumors.

    Outcome
    Not applicablegallbladder tumor reports
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Cancer

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Two events were related to gallbladder tumors.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  17. 22HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, no significant other common gastrointestinal events difference was reported; the exact original reporting comparison was unspecified.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, other gastrointestinal events showed no significant difference; the exact reporting comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    No significant changeother common gastrointestinal events reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences were found for other common gastrointestinal events, pancreatic tumors, depression, or suicidal ideation.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  18. 23HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, no significant pancreatic tumors difference was reported; the exact original reporting comparison was unspecified.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, pancreatic tumors showed no significant difference; the exact reporting comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    No significant changepancreatic tumors reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Cancer

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences were found for other common gastrointestinal events, pancreatic tumors, depression, or suicidal ideation.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  19. 24HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, no significant depression difference was reported; the exact original reporting comparison was unspecified.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, depression showed no significant difference; the exact reporting comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    No significant changedepression reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Mental health and mood

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences were found for other common gastrointestinal events, pancreatic tumors, depression, or suicidal ideation.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  20. 25HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneObservational studySafety outcome

    In pooled European weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, no significant suicidal ideation difference was reported; the exact original reporting comparison was unspecified.

    In plain wordsIn weight-management reports involving liraglutide or semaglutide, suicidal ideation showed no significant difference; the exact reporting comparison was unspecified.

    Outcome
    No significant changesuicidal ideation reporting frequency
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Mental health and mood

    Source sentences

    Summary
    No significant differences were found for other common gastrointestinal events, pancreatic tumors, depression, or suicidal ideation.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    A retrospective case-non-case study was conducted using data from the EudraVigilance database.
    Summary · context
    All cases involving liraglutide or semaglutide used for weight management and collected in the database between January 2018 and December 2023 were analyzed.
    Summary · context
    Disproportionality analysis was performed to assess the reporting odds ratios for events of interest (gastrointestinal events, pancreatitis, gallbladders disorders, psychiatric events, and gallbladder, pancreatic or thyroid tumors) reported at least three times.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.