Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2024

2 results

Evaluating the Impact of Novel Incretin Therapies on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: An Early Systematic Review.

Salmen T, Potcovaru CG, Bica IC, Giglio RV, Patti AM, Stoica RA, Ciaccio M, El-Tanani M, Janež A, Rizzo M, Gherghiceanu F, Stoian AP

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)3 Oct 2024Cited by 3 (Europe PMC)

Summary

Background This systematic review is registered with CRD42024507397 protocol number and aims to compare the known data about retatrutide on long-term cardiovascular (CV) protection with tirzepatide, an incretin with recent proven CV benefits. Material and Methods The inclusion criteria were (i) original full-text articles that are randomized control or clinical trials; (ii) published within the last ten years; (iii) published in English; and (iv) conducted on adult human populations. The exclusion criteria were articles deruled on cell cultures or mammals. Studies were selected if they (1) included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and CV risk; (2) patients that received either tirzepatide or retatrutide; and (3) provided sufficient information such as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals or at least a sufficient p-value. Studies were excluded if they were a letter to the editor, expert opinions, case reports, meeting abstracts, or reviews; redundant publications; or needed more precise or complete data. Results The seven included studies were assessed for bias with the Newcastle Ottawa scale, heterogenous, and emphasized the potential CV beneficial effect of type 2 DM (T2DM) therapies (glycemia, glycated A1c hemoglobin, body weight, lipid profile, blood pressure and renal parameter). Discussions Further, longer follow-up studies are necessary to verify the long-term CV protection, standardize the specific aspects of CV risk, and compare with subjects without T2DM for a more integrative interpretation of the CV effects independent of the improvement of metabolic activity.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study2

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Tirzepatide aloneSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In a systematic review of seven studies in adults with type 2 diabetes, studies of tirzepatide or retatrutide pooled together emphasized a potential cardiovascular benefit across glycemia, body weight, lipids, blood pressure and renal parameters.

    In plain wordsIn a review of seven studies in adults with type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide and retatrutide studies together pointed to a possible heart benefit.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedCardiovascular risk factors in included studies
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Cardiovascular

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Results The seven included studies were assessed for bias with the Newcastle Ottawa scale, heterogenous, and emphasized the potential CV beneficial effect of type 2 DM (T2DM) therapies (glycemia, glycated A1c hemoglobin, body weight, lipid profile, blood pressure and renal parameter).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Studies were selected if they (1) included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and CV risk; (2) patients that received either tirzepatide or retatrutide; and (3) provided sufficient information such as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals or at least a sufficient p-value.

    In this study, Tirzepatide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Tirzepatide.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Retatrutide aloneSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In a systematic review of seven studies in adults with type 2 diabetes, studies of tirzepatide or retatrutide pooled together emphasized a potential cardiovascular benefit across glycemia, body weight, lipids, blood pressure and renal parameters.

    In plain wordsIn a review of seven studies in adults with type 2 diabetes, tirzepatide and retatrutide studies together pointed to a possible heart benefit.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedCardiovascular risk factors in included studies
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Outcome group
    Cardiometabolic risk factors · Cardiovascular

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Results The seven included studies were assessed for bias with the Newcastle Ottawa scale, heterogenous, and emphasized the potential CV beneficial effect of type 2 DM (T2DM) therapies (glycemia, glycated A1c hemoglobin, body weight, lipid profile, blood pressure and renal parameter).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    Studies were selected if they (1) included patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and CV risk; (2) patients that received either tirzepatide or retatrutide; and (3) provided sufficient information such as the corresponding 95% confidence intervals or at least a sufficient p-value.

    In this study, Retatrutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Retatrutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    10 Oct 2026, 10:21 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:07 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:04 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.