Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2022

6 results

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials.

Qin J, Song L

BMC endocrine disorders12 May 2022Cited by 26 (Europe PMC)

Summary

BackgroundThe cardiovascular effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are still controversial in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular events of GLP-1 (albiglutide, exenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, lixisenatide and dulaglutide) receptor agonists in T2DM patients.MethodsPubMed and Embase were searched to find relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to June 2019 that evaluated the effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on cardiovascular events in patients with T2DM. The T2DM patients of all the eligible trials received either GLP-1 therapy or placebo, and the cardiovascular outcomes included death from cardiovascular causes, fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction and fatal or non-fatal stroke.ResultsWe included 6 multinational double-blind randomized placebo-control trials that included a total of 52821 T2DM patients. The results indicated that GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.97; P = 0.004) and fatal or non-fatal stroke (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.94; P = 0.001) compared with the placebo controls. But GLP-1 receptor agonists did not significantly alter the fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction compared with the placebo (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.82 - 1.01; P = 0.06).ConclusionWe concluded that GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy could reduce the risk of death from cardiovascular causes and fatal or non-fatal stroke compared with the placebo in the treatment of T2DM patients in trials with cardiovascular outcomes.
CC BYText from Europe PMC. Highlighted sentences are the source of results.

Results from this study6

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone6

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists (including liraglutide) reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 drugs, liraglutide among them, lowered the risk of cardiovascular death compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreaseDeath from cardiovascular causes
    Study

    n = 52,821

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    0.9
    cardiovascular death, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results indicated that GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.97; P = 0.004) and fatal or non-fatal stroke (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.94; P = 0.001) compared with the placebo controls.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We included 6 multinational double-blind randomized placebo-control trials that included a total of 52821 T2DM patients.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists (including liraglutide) reduced the risk of fatal or non-fatal stroke versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 drugs, liraglutide among them, lowered the risk of stroke compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreaseFatal or non-fatal stroke
    Study

    n = 52,821

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    0.85
    stroke, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results indicated that GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.97; P = 0.004) and fatal or non-fatal stroke (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.94; P = 0.001) compared with the placebo controls.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We included 6 multinational double-blind randomized placebo-control trials that included a total of 52821 T2DM patients.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  3. 03HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists (including liraglutide) did not significantly change fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 drugs, liraglutide among them, did not significantly change heart attack risk compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction
    Study

    n = 52,821

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    0.91
    myocardial infarction, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists

    Source sentences

    Summary
    But GLP-1 receptor agonists did not significantly alter the fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction compared with the placebo (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.82 - 1.01; P = 0.06).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We included 6 multinational double-blind randomized placebo-control trials that included a total of 52821 T2DM patients.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  4. 04HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists (including semaglutide) reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 drugs, semaglutide among them, lowered the risk of cardiovascular death compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreaseDeath from cardiovascular causes
    Study

    n = 52,821

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    0.9
    cardiovascular death, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results indicated that GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.97; P = 0.004) and fatal or non-fatal stroke (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.94; P = 0.001) compared with the placebo controls.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We included 6 multinational double-blind randomized placebo-control trials that included a total of 52821 T2DM patients.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  5. 05HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists (including semaglutide) reduced the risk of fatal or non-fatal stroke versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 drugs, semaglutide among them, lowered the risk of stroke compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    DecreaseFatal or non-fatal stroke
    Study

    n = 52,821

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    0.85
    stroke, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The results indicated that GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of death from cardiovascular causes (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83-0.97; P = 0.004) and fatal or non-fatal stroke (RR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77-0.94; P = 0.001) compared with the placebo controls.
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We included 6 multinational double-blind randomized placebo-control trials that included a total of 52821 T2DM patients.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

  6. 06HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewEfficacy outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists (including semaglutide) did not significantly change fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction versus placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 drugs, semaglutide among them, did not significantly change heart attack risk compared with placebo.

    Outcome
    No significant changeFatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction
    Study

    n = 52,821

    Comparator
    Placebo
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    Relative risk
    0.91
    myocardial infarction, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists

    Source sentences

    Summary
    But GLP-1 receptor agonists did not significantly alter the fatal or non-fatal myocardial infarction compared with the placebo (RR: 0.91; 95% CI: 0.82 - 1.01; P = 0.06).
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    We included 6 multinational double-blind randomized placebo-control trials that included a total of 52821 T2DM patients.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Versions 4 to 5Current

    27 Oct 2026, 16:36 UTC

    The same notice was added 2 times, first on 21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC. The status did not change between them.

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  2. Version 3

    12 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC

    Study results updated

  3. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  4. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.