Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 127 · 2022

14 results

Effect of Weekly Subcutaneous Semaglutide vs Daily Liraglutide on Body Weight in Adults With Overweight or Obesity Without Diabetes: The STEP 8 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rubino DM, Greenway FL, Khalid U, O'Neil PM, Rosenstock J, Sørrig R, Wadden TA, Wizert A, Garvey WT

JAMA1 Jan 2022Cited by 749 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study14

14 results from studies that gave the peptide. 14 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, liraglutide 3.0 mg daily reduced body weight by 6.4% at week 68, less than semaglutide 2.4 mg weekly (15.8%).

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, liraglutide caused 6.4% weight loss over 68 weeks, less than the 15.8% with semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreasePercentage change in body weight at week 68 versus semaglutide
    Study

    n = 127

    Comparator
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −6.4%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The mean weight change from baseline was -15.8% with semaglutide vs -6.4% with liraglutide (difference, -9.4 percentage points [95% CI, -12.0 to -6.8]; P < .001); weight change with pooled placebo was -1.9%.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced body weight by 15.8% versus 6.4% with liraglutide 3.0 mg at week 68.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, semaglutide led to more weight loss than liraglutide after 68 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreasePercentage change in body weight, semaglutide vs liraglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg once weekly · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean weight change
    −15.8%
    semaglutide
    Mean weight change
    −6.4%
    liraglutide
    Difference
    −9.4 percentage points
    semaglutide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The mean weight change from baseline was -15.8% with semaglutide vs -6.4% with liraglutide (difference, -9.4 percentage points [95% CI, -12.0 to -6.8]; P < .001
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, liraglutide 3.0 mg daily gave a mean weight change of -6.4% against -1.9% with pooled placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, liraglutide gave 6.4% weight loss against 1.9% with placebo over 68 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreasePercentage change in body weight at week 68 versus pooled placebo
    Study

    n = 127

    Comparator
    Pooled placebo
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Weight change
    −6.4%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg
    Weight change
    −1.9%
    pooled placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The mean weight change from baseline was -15.8% with semaglutide vs -6.4% with liraglutide (difference, -9.4 percentage points [95% CI, -12.0 to -6.8]; P < .001); weight change with pooled placebo was -1.9%
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Comparisons of active treatments vs pooled placebo were supportive secondary end points.
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, 25.6% reached 10% or more weight loss with liraglutide versus 70.9% with semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, 25.6% on liraglutide lost 10% or more of their weight, against 70.9% on semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAchievement of 10% or more weight loss
    Study

    n = 127

    Comparator
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion with 10% or more weight loss
    25.6%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Participants had significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss with semaglutide vs liraglutide (70.9% of participants vs 25.6% [odds ratio, 6.3 {95% CI, 3.5 to 11.2}], 55.6% vs 12.0% [odds ratio, 7.9 {95% CI, 4.1 to 15.4}], and 38.5% vs 6.0% [odds rati…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  5. 05HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, 12.0% reached 15% or more weight loss with liraglutide versus 55.6% with semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, 12.0% on liraglutide lost 15% or more of their weight, against 55.6% on semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAchievement of 15% or more weight loss
    Study

    n = 127

    Comparator
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion with 15% or more weight loss
    12%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Participants had significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss with semaglutide vs liraglutide (70.9% of participants vs 25.6% [odds ratio, 6.3 {95% CI, 3.5 to 11.2}], 55.6% vs 12.0% [odds ratio, 7.9 {95% CI, 4.1 to 15.4}], and 38.5% vs 6.0% [odds rati…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  6. 06HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, 6.0% reached 20% or more weight loss with liraglutide versus 38.5% with semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, 6.0% on liraglutide lost 20% or more of their weight, against 38.5% on semaglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseAchievement of 20% or more weight loss
    Study

    n = 127

    Comparator
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion with 20% or more weight loss
    6%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Participants had significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss with semaglutide vs liraglutide (70.9% of participants vs 25.6% [odds ratio, 6.3 {95% CI, 3.5 to 11.2}], 55.6% vs 12.0% [odds ratio, 7.9 {95% CI, 4.1 to 15.4}], and 38.5% vs 6.0% [odds rati…
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  7. 07HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, semaglutide 2.4 mg reduced body weight by 15.8% versus 1.9% with pooled placebo.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, semaglutide led to more weight loss than placebo after 68 weeks.

    Outcome
    DecreasePercentage change in body weight, semaglutide vs pooled placebo
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo (pooled)
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg once weekly · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mean weight change
    −15.8%
    semaglutide
    Mean weight change
    −1.9%
    pooled placebo

    Source sentences

    Summary
    The mean weight change from baseline was -15.8% with semaglutide vs -6.4% with liraglutide (difference, -9.4 percentage points [95% CI, -12.0 to -6.8]; P < .001); weight change with pooled placebo was -1.9%.
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Comparisons of active treatments vs pooled placebo were supportive secondary end points.
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  8. 08HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    More adults reached weight loss of 10% or more with semaglutide than with liraglutide (70.9% vs 25.6%).

    In plain wordsMore adults lost at least 10% of their weight with semaglutide than with liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseWeight loss of 10% or more
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg once weekly · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion
    70.9%
    semaglutide
    Proportion
    25.6%
    liraglutide
    Odds ratio
    6.3 ratio
    semaglutide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    70.9% of participants vs 25.6% [odds ratio, 6.3 {95% CI, 3.5 to 11.2}]
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Participants had significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss with semaglutide vs liraglutide
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  9. 09HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    More adults reached weight loss of 15% or more with semaglutide than with liraglutide (55.6% vs 12.0%).

    In plain wordsMore adults lost at least 15% of their weight with semaglutide than with liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseWeight loss of 15% or more
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg once weekly · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion
    55.6%
    semaglutide
    Proportion
    12%
    liraglutide
    Odds ratio
    7.9 ratio
    semaglutide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    55.6% vs 12.0% [odds ratio, 7.9 {95% CI, 4.1 to 15.4}]
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Participants had significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss with semaglutide vs liraglutide
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  10. 10HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    More adults reached weight loss of 20% or more with semaglutide than with liraglutide (38.5% vs 6.0%).

    In plain wordsMore adults lost at least 20% of their weight with semaglutide than with liraglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseWeight loss of 20% or more
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily
    Analysis
    Secondary
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg once weekly · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Proportion
    38.5%
    semaglutide
    Proportion
    6%
    liraglutide
    Odds ratio
    8.2 ratio
    semaglutide vs liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    38.5% vs 6.0% [odds ratio, 8.2 {95% CI, 3.5 to 19.1}]
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Participants had significantly greater odds of achieving 10% or more, 15% or more, and 20% or more weight loss with semaglutide vs liraglutide
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  11. 11HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, 27.6% discontinued liraglutide for any reason versus 13.5% on semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, 27.6% stopped liraglutide for any reason, against 13.5% on semaglutide.

    Outcome
    IncreaseDiscontinuation of treatment for any reason
    Study

    n = 127

    Comparator
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Discontinuation
    27.6%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Proportions of participants discontinuing treatment for any reason were 13.5% with semaglutide and 27.6% with liraglutide.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  12. 12HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In adults with overweight or obesity without diabetes, 82.7% reported gastrointestinal adverse events with liraglutide versus 84.1% with semaglutide.

    In plain wordsIn adults with overweight or obesity, 82.7% on liraglutide had stomach or gut side effects, against 84.1% on semaglutide.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedGastrointestinal adverse events
    Study

    n = 127

    Comparator
    Semaglutide 2.4 mg
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    3.0 mg once daily · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Gastrointestinal adverse events
    82.7%
    liraglutide 3.0 mg

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by 84.1% with semaglutide and 82.7% with liraglutide.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  13. 13HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    Treatment was stopped for any reason by 13.5% of participants with semaglutide and 27.6% with liraglutide.

    In plain wordsFewer people stopped treatment with semaglutide (13.5%) than with liraglutide (27.6%).

    Outcome
    DecreaseDiscontinuation of treatment for any reason
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily
    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg once weekly · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Discontinuation
    13.5%
    semaglutide
    Discontinuation
    27.6%
    liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Proportions of participants discontinuing treatment for any reason were 13.5% with semaglutide and 27.6% with liraglutide.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.
  14. 14HumanRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by 84.1% of participants with semaglutide and 82.7% with liraglutide.

    In plain wordsStomach and gut side effects were reported by 84.1% of people with semaglutide and 82.7% with liraglutide.

    Outcome
    Direction not reportedGastrointestinal adverse events
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 3.0 mg once daily
    Outcome group
    Gastrointestinal adverse events · Gastrointestinal
    Studied dose
    2.4 mg once weekly · subcutaneous · 68 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Gastrointestinal adverse events
    84.1%
    semaglutide
    Gastrointestinal adverse events
    82.7%
    liraglutide

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Gastrointestinal adverse events were reported by 84.1% with semaglutide and 82.7% with liraglutide.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Randomized, open-label, 68-week, phase 3b trial conducted at 19 US sites from September 2019 (enrollment: September 11-November 26) to May 2021 (end of follow-up: May 11) in adults with body mass index of 30 or greater or 27 or greater with 1 or more weight-related comorbidities, without diabetes (N = 338).
    Summary · context
    Participants were randomized (3:1:3:1) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide, 2.4 mg (16-week escalation; n = 126), or matching placebo, or once-daily subcutaneous liraglutide, 3.0 mg (4-week escalation; n = 127), or matching placebo, plus diet and physical activity.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials3

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

3 trials · 2 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

Status unknownPhase 4NCT06438146

LIROH - Liraglutide for Obesity in HIV

Brigham and Women's Hospitaln = 402 May 2024 to est. May 2025

Obesity · HIV Infections

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 31 May 2024
CompletedPhase 4NCT05574439

Young Adults With Early-onset Obesity Treated With Semaglutide

Signe Torekovn = 24630 May 2022 to 1 Apr 2026

Obesity, Adolescent

CompletedPhase 3Results postedNCT04074161

Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works Compared to Liraglutide in People Living With Overweight or Obesity

Novo Nordisk A/Sn = 33811 Sept 2019 to 11 May 2021

Overweight · Obesity

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 19 May 2023

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Versions 3 to 38Current

    28 Oct 2026, 02:04 UTC

    The same notice was added 36 times, first on 9 Oct 2026, 18:17 UTC. The status did not change between them.

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.