Skip to content

Study · Observational study · 2020

7 results

Superior weight loss with once-weekly semaglutide versus other glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists is independent of gastrointestinal adverse events.

Lingvay I, Hansen T, Macura S, Marre M, Nauck MA, de la Rosa R, Woo V, Yildirim E, Wilding J

BMJ open diabetes research & care1 Oct 2020Cited by 39 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: CC BY-NC. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study7

5 results from studies that gave the peptide. 5 results from people.

  1. 01HumanObservational studyMechanism

    In diabetes patients, nausea/vomiting explained little of semaglutide's greater weight loss versus exenatide in SUSTAIN 3.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, nausea and vomiting explained little of semaglutide's greater weight loss compared with exenatide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNausea/vomiting-mediated weight loss difference versus exenatide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Exenatide extended release
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 56 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.05 kg
    baseline to week 12, SUSTAIN 3
    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.09 kg
    baseline to end of treatment, SUSTAIN 3
    Total weight loss difference
    3.78 kg
    end of treatment, SUSTAIN 3

    Source sentences

    Summary
    From baseline to week 12 or EOT, the nausea/vomiting-mediated difference in WL was, respectively: 0.05 or 0.09 kg of 3.78 kg at EOT (SUSTAIN 3);
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    Semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated hemoglobin and body weight (BW) reductions versus other GLP-1RAs in SUSTAIN 3 (versus exenatide extended release 2.0 mg), SUSTAIN 7 (versus dulaglutide) and SUSTAIN 10 (liraglutide 1.2 mg).
    Summary · context
    Subjects within trials were subdivided into those who reported (yes/no) nausea/vomiting or any other GI AE.
    Summary · context
    A mediation analysis separated WL into direct or indirect (mediated by GI AEs) effects.
  2. 02HumanObservational studyMechanism

    In diabetes patients, nausea/vomiting explained little of semaglutide's greater weight loss versus dulaglutide in the low-dose comparison.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, nausea and vomiting explained little of semaglutide's greater weight loss than dulaglutide in the low-dose comparison.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNausea/vomiting-mediated weight loss difference, low-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide, low-dose comparison
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.06 kg
    baseline to week 12, low-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.03 kg
    baseline to end of treatment, low-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Total weight loss difference
    2.26 kg
    end of treatment, low-dose SUSTAIN 7

    Source sentences

    Summary
    0.06 or 0.03 kg of 2.26 kg at EOT (low-dose comparison) and 0.08 or 0.04 kg of 3.55 kg at EOT (high-dose comparison) (SUSTAIN 7)
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    From baseline to week 12 or EOT, the nausea/vomiting-mediated difference in WL was, respectively:
    Summary · context
    Semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated hemoglobin and body weight (BW) reductions versus other GLP-1RAs in SUSTAIN 3 (versus exenatide extended release 2.0 mg), SUSTAIN 7 (versus dulaglutide) and SUSTAIN 10 (liraglutide 1.2 mg).
    Summary · context
    Subjects within trials were subdivided into those who reported (yes/no) nausea/vomiting or any other GI AE.
    Summary · context
    A mediation analysis separated WL into direct or indirect (mediated by GI AEs) effects.
  3. 03HumanObservational studyMechanism

    In diabetes patients, nausea/vomiting explained little of semaglutide's greater weight loss versus dulaglutide in the high-dose comparison.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, nausea and vomiting explained little of semaglutide's greater weight loss than dulaglutide in the high-dose comparison.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNausea/vomiting-mediated weight loss difference, high-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Dulaglutide, high-dose comparison
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 40 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.08 kg
    baseline to week 12, high-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.04 kg
    baseline to end of treatment, high-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Total weight loss difference
    3.55 kg
    end of treatment, high-dose SUSTAIN 7

    Source sentences

    Summary
    0.06 or 0.03 kg of 2.26 kg at EOT (low-dose comparison) and 0.08 or 0.04 kg of 3.55 kg at EOT (high-dose comparison) (SUSTAIN 7)
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    From baseline to week 12 or EOT, the nausea/vomiting-mediated difference in WL was, respectively:
    Summary · context
    Semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated hemoglobin and body weight (BW) reductions versus other GLP-1RAs in SUSTAIN 3 (versus exenatide extended release 2.0 mg), SUSTAIN 7 (versus dulaglutide) and SUSTAIN 10 (liraglutide 1.2 mg).
    Summary · context
    Subjects within trials were subdivided into those who reported (yes/no) nausea/vomiting or any other GI AE.
    Summary · context
    A mediation analysis separated WL into direct or indirect (mediated by GI AEs) effects.
  4. 04HumanObservational studyMechanism

    In diabetes patients, nausea/vomiting explained little of semaglutide's greater weight loss versus liraglutide in SUSTAIN 10.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, nausea and vomiting explained little of semaglutide's greater weight loss compared with liraglutide.

    Outcome
    DecreaseNausea/vomiting-mediated weight loss difference versus liraglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Liraglutide 1.2 mg
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    Dose not stated · 30 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.05 kg
    baseline to week 12, SUSTAIN 10
    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.09 kg
    baseline to end of treatment, SUSTAIN 10
    Total weight loss difference
    3.82 kg
    end of treatment, SUSTAIN 10

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and 0.05 or 0.09 kg of 3.82 kg at EOT (SUSTAIN 10).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    From baseline to week 12 or EOT, the nausea/vomiting-mediated difference in WL was, respectively:
    Summary · context
    Semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated hemoglobin and body weight (BW) reductions versus other GLP-1RAs in SUSTAIN 3 (versus exenatide extended release 2.0 mg), SUSTAIN 7 (versus dulaglutide) and SUSTAIN 10 (liraglutide 1.2 mg).
    Summary · context
    Subjects within trials were subdivided into those who reported (yes/no) nausea/vomiting or any other GI AE.
    Summary · context
    A mediation analysis separated WL into direct or indirect (mediated by GI AEs) effects.
  5. 05HumanObservational studyMechanism

    In diabetes patients, liraglutide produced less weight loss than semaglutide, with little difference explained by nausea/vomiting.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, liraglutide produced less weight loss than semaglutide; nausea and vomiting explained little of the difference.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea/vomiting-mediated weight loss difference versus semaglutide
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Semaglutide
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight
    Studied dose
    1.2 mg · 30 weeksAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.05 kg
    baseline to week 12, SUSTAIN 10
    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.09 kg
    baseline to end of treatment, SUSTAIN 10
    Total weight loss difference
    3.82 kg
    end of treatment, SUSTAIN 10

    Source sentences

    Summary
    and 0.05 or 0.09 kg of 3.82 kg at EOT (SUSTAIN 10).
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    From baseline to week 12 or EOT, the nausea/vomiting-mediated difference in WL was, respectively:
    Summary · context
    Semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated hemoglobin and body weight (BW) reductions versus other GLP-1RAs in SUSTAIN 3 (versus exenatide extended release 2.0 mg), SUSTAIN 7 (versus dulaglutide) and SUSTAIN 10 (liraglutide 1.2 mg).
    Summary · context
    Subjects within trials were subdivided into those who reported (yes/no) nausea/vomiting or any other GI AE.
    Summary · context
    A mediation analysis separated WL into direct or indirect (mediated by GI AEs) effects.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  1. 06HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneObservational studyMechanism

    In diabetes patients, dulaglutide produced less weight loss than semaglutide, with little difference explained by nausea/vomiting in the low-dose comparison.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, dulaglutide produced less weight loss than semaglutide; nausea and vomiting explained little of the low-dose difference.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea/vomiting-mediated weight loss difference, low-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Semaglutide, low-dose comparison
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.06 kg
    baseline to week 12, low-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.03 kg
    baseline to end of treatment, low-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Total weight loss difference
    2.26 kg
    end of treatment, low-dose SUSTAIN 7

    Source sentences

    Summary
    0.06 or 0.03 kg of 2.26 kg at EOT (low-dose comparison) and 0.08 or 0.04 kg of 3.55 kg at EOT (high-dose comparison) (SUSTAIN 7)
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    From baseline to week 12 or EOT, the nausea/vomiting-mediated difference in WL was, respectively:
    Summary · context
    Semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated hemoglobin and body weight (BW) reductions versus other GLP-1RAs in SUSTAIN 3 (versus exenatide extended release 2.0 mg), SUSTAIN 7 (versus dulaglutide) and SUSTAIN 10 (liraglutide 1.2 mg).
    Summary · context
    Subjects within trials were subdivided into those who reported (yes/no) nausea/vomiting or any other GI AE.
    Summary · context
    A mediation analysis separated WL into direct or indirect (mediated by GI AEs) effects.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

  2. 07HumanNot a test of Dulaglutide (Trulicity) aloneObservational studyMechanism

    In diabetes patients, dulaglutide produced less weight loss than semaglutide, with little difference explained by nausea/vomiting in the high-dose comparison.

    In plain wordsIn people with diabetes, dulaglutide produced less weight loss than semaglutide; nausea and vomiting explained little of the high-dose difference.

    Outcome
    IncreaseNausea/vomiting-mediated weight loss difference, high-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Semaglutide, high-dose comparison
    Outcome group
    Body weight · Metabolic and weight

    Measurements

    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.08 kg
    baseline to week 12, high-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Mediated weight loss difference
    0.04 kg
    baseline to end of treatment, high-dose SUSTAIN 7
    Total weight loss difference
    3.55 kg
    end of treatment, high-dose SUSTAIN 7

    Source sentences

    Summary
    0.06 or 0.03 kg of 2.26 kg at EOT (low-dose comparison) and 0.08 or 0.04 kg of 3.55 kg at EOT (high-dose comparison) (SUSTAIN 7)
    4 context sentences
    Summary · context
    From baseline to week 12 or EOT, the nausea/vomiting-mediated difference in WL was, respectively:
    Summary · context
    Semaglutide demonstrated superior glycated hemoglobin and body weight (BW) reductions versus other GLP-1RAs in SUSTAIN 3 (versus exenatide extended release 2.0 mg), SUSTAIN 7 (versus dulaglutide) and SUSTAIN 10 (liraglutide 1.2 mg).
    Summary · context
    Subjects within trials were subdivided into those who reported (yes/no) nausea/vomiting or any other GI AE.
    Summary · context
    A mediation analysis separated WL into direct or indirect (mediated by GI AEs) effects.

    In this study, Dulaglutide (Trulicity) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Dulaglutide (Trulicity).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 4Current

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Versions 2 to 3

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    The same notice was added 2 times, first on 9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC. The status did not change between them.

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.