Skip to content

Study · Randomized controlled trial · n = 51 · 2019

5 results

Neoadjuvant Degarelix Versus Triptorelin in Premenopausal Patients Who Receive Letrozole for Locally Advanced Endocrine-Responsive Breast Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial.

Dellapasqua S, Gray KP, Munzone E, Rubino D, Gianni L, Johansson H, Viale G, Ribi K, Bernhard J, Kammler R, Maibach R, Rabaglio-Poretti M and 7 more

Show all authors

Ruepp B, Di Leo A, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Regan MM, Goldhirsch A, Colleoni M

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology27 Dec 2018Cited by 23 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study5

4 results from studies that gave the peptide. 4 results from people.

  1. 01HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In premenopausal women with breast cancer receiving letrozole, optimal ovarian suppression took longer with triptorelin than with degarelix.

    In plain wordsIn premenopausal women with breast cancer receiving letrozole, ovarian suppression took longer with triptorelin than with degarelix.

    Outcome
    IncreaseTime to optimal ovarian function suppression
    Study

    n = 51

    Comparator
    degarelix with the same letrozole background
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    3.75 mg on day 1 of every cycle · intramuscular · six 28-day cyclesAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Median time to optimal OFS
    14 days
    triptorelin plus letrozole
    Median time to optimal OFS
    3 days
    degarelix plus letrozole
    Hazard ratio for time to optimal OFS
    3.05 hazard ratio
    degarelix plus letrozole versus triptorelin plus letrozole

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Time to optimal OFS was three times faster for patients assigned to degarelix and letrozole than to triptorelin and letrozole (median, 3 v 14 days; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.65 to 5.65; P < .001).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
    Summary · context
    Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole).
  2. 02HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving letrozole, degarelix shortened median time to optimal ovarian suppression versus triptorelin (3 versus 14 days).

    In plain wordsIn premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving letrozole, degarelix achieved optimal ovarian suppression faster than triptorelin.

    Peptide
    Degarelix
    Outcome
    DecreaseTime to optimal ovarian function suppression
    Study

    n = 51

    Comparator
    Triptorelin plus letrozole
    Analysis
    Primary
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    240 mg on day 1 of cycle 1, then 80 mg on day 1 of cycles 2 through 6 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Median time to optimal OFS
    3 days
    degarelix plus letrozole
    Median time to optimal OFS
    14 days
    triptorelin plus letrozole
    Hazard ratio
    3.05
    degarelix plus letrozole versus triptorelin plus letrozole
    95% CI lower bound
    1.65
    hazard ratio
    95% CI upper bound
    5.65
    hazard ratio
    P value
    < 0.001
    between-group comparison

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Time to optimal OFS was three times faster for patients assigned to degarelix and letrozole than to triptorelin and letrozole (median, 3 v 14 days; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.65 to 5.65; P < .001).
    3 context sentences
    Summary · context
    The primary end point was time to optimal OFS (time from the first injection to first assessment of centrally assessed estradiol level ≤ 2.72 pg/mL [≤ 10 pmol/L] during neoadjuvant therapy).
    Summary · context
    To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
    Summary · context
    Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole).
  3. 03HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In premenopausal women with breast cancer receiving letrozole, suboptimal ovarian suppression occurred with triptorelin while degarelix maintained suppression in all patients.

    In plain wordsIn premenopausal women with breast cancer receiving letrozole, some triptorelin patients had incomplete ovarian suppression, while all degarelix patients maintained suppression.

    Outcome
    IncreaseSuboptimal ovarian function suppression after cycle 1
    Study

    n = 51

    Comparator
    degarelix with the same letrozole background
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    3.75 mg on day 1 of every cycle · intramuscular · six 28-day cyclesAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients with suboptimal OFS
    15.4%
    triptorelin plus letrozole after cycle 1
    Suboptimal OFS events
    6 events
    127 measurements

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Furthermore, OFS was maintained during subsequent cycles for all patients assigned to receive degarelix and letrozole, whereas 15.4% of patients assigned to receive triptorelin and letrozole had suboptimal OFS after cycle 1 (six events during 127 measurements).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
    Summary · context
    Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole).
  4. 04HumanRandomized controlled trialEfficacy outcome

    In premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving letrozole, degarelix maintained ovarian suppression in all patients, whereas 15.4% with triptorelin had suboptimal suppression after cycle 1.

    In plain wordsIn premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving letrozole, all degarelix patients maintained ovarian suppression, whereas some triptorelin patients had suboptimal suppression.

    Peptide
    Degarelix
    Outcome
    IncreaseMaintenance of ovarian function suppression
    Study

    n = 51

    Comparator
    Triptorelin plus letrozole
    Outcome group
    Sex hormones and fertility · Endocrine and hormones
    Studied dose
    240 mg on day 1 of cycle 1, then 80 mg on day 1 of cycles 2 through 6 · subcutaneousAs given in this study (human).

    Measurements

    Patients with suboptimal OFS after cycle 1
    15.4%
    triptorelin plus letrozole
    Suboptimal OFS events
    6 events
    triptorelin plus letrozole, during 127 measurements

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Furthermore, OFS was maintained during subsequent cycles for all patients assigned to receive degarelix and letrozole, whereas 15.4% of patients assigned to receive triptorelin and letrozole had suboptimal OFS after cycle 1 (six events during 127 measurements).
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
    Summary · context
    Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole).

Studies that did not test the peptide alone1

In this study, Triptorelin (Trelstar, Decapeptyl) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking Triptorelin (Trelstar, Decapeptyl).

  1. 05HumanNot a test of Triptorelin (Trelstar, Decapeptyl) aloneRandomized controlled trialSafety outcome

    In premenopausal women with breast cancer, adverse events with triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected.

    In plain wordsIn premenopausal women with breast cancer, adverse events with triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected.

    Outcome
    Not applicableExpected adverse events
    Study

    n = 26

    Outcome group
    Adverse events · Whole body

    Source sentences

    Summary
    Adverse events as a result of both degarelix plus letrozole and triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected.
    2 context sentences
    Summary · context
    To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer.
    Summary · context
    Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole).

    In this study, Triptorelin (Trelstar, Decapeptyl) was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Triptorelin (Trelstar, Decapeptyl).

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Registered trials1

Trials this study reports on, or that list this study as a reference. Registry data from ClinicalTrials.gov.

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results · source ClinicalTrials.gov (opens in a new tab)

CompletedPhase 2Results postedNCT02005887

TRial on the Endocrine Activity of Neoadjuvant Degarelix

ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundationn = 51Feb 2014 to 25 Aug 2017

Breast Cancer Invasive Nos

Trial pageClinicalTrials.govUpdated 2 Sept 2026

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    27 Oct 2026, 16:34 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  2. Version 2

    22 Oct 2026, 02:26 UTC

    Study results updated

  3. Version 1

    21 Oct 2026, 18:59 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.