Skip to content

Study · Not a test of the peptide alone · 2017

2 results

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Monami M, Nreu B, Scatena A, Giannini S, Andreozzi F, Sesti G, Mannucci E

Journal of endocrinological investigation31 May 2017Cited by 52 (Europe PMC)

Summary

The text of this summary is not shown here, because the article license does not allow reuse. Read it at the source (opens in a new tab)

Text rights: Publisher copyright. Results still quote short attributed sentences.

Results from this study2

No result from this study comes from a test of the peptide.

Studies that did not test the peptide alone2

In this study, the peptide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. These results are not evidence about taking the peptide.

  1. 01HumanNot a test of Liraglutide aloneSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists (including liraglutide) were not associated with a significant increase in atrial fibrillation versus placebo or other non-GLP-1 RA drugs.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 drugs as a class, including liraglutide, were not linked to more atrial fibrillation than comparators.

    Outcome
    No significant changeAtrial fibrillation incidence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo or non-GLP-1 RA drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    Mantel-Haenszel OR
    0.87 ratio
    pooled GLP-1 RA

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the remaining trials (enrolling 17,966 and 15,305 patients in GLP-1 RA and comparator arms, respectively, 55.3% women, with a mean age of 57.0 ± 3.8 years), treatment with GLP-1 RA was not associated with a significant increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation [Mantel-Haenszel OR (95% CI)…
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A Medline search for GLP-1 RA (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials with a duration ≥12 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes and comparing a GLP-1 RA with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 RA drug.

    In this study, Liraglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Liraglutide.

  2. 02HumanNot a test of Semaglutide aloneSystematic reviewSafety outcome

    In adults with type 2 diabetes, pooled GLP-1 receptor agonists (including semaglutide) were not associated with a significant increase in atrial fibrillation versus placebo or other non-GLP-1 RA drugs.

    In plain wordsIn adults with type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 drugs as a class, including semaglutide, were not linked to more atrial fibrillation than comparators.

    Outcome
    No significant changeAtrial fibrillation incidence
    Study

    n: not reported in source

    Comparator
    Placebo or non-GLP-1 RA drugs
    Outcome group
    Cardiovascular events · Cardiovascular

    Measurements

    Mantel-Haenszel OR
    0.87 ratio
    pooled GLP-1 RA

    Source sentences

    Summary
    In the remaining trials (enrolling 17,966 and 15,305 patients in GLP-1 RA and comparator arms, respectively, 55.3% women, with a mean age of 57.0 ± 3.8 years), treatment with GLP-1 RA was not associated with a significant increase in the incidence of atrial fibrillation [Mantel-Haenszel OR (95% CI)…
    1 context sentence
    Summary · context
    A Medline search for GLP-1 RA (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials with a duration ≥12 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes and comparing a GLP-1 RA with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 RA drug.

    In this study, Semaglutide was a lab tool or a carrier, part of a mix, or the subject of a lab method. This result is not evidence about taking Semaglutide.

AI wrote and checked these results. AI can make mistakes, so check important results against the source.

Version history

PepBank keeps every version of the data on this study. Status changes from Retraction Watch, Europe PMC and Crossref are listed with their source.

  1. Version 3Current

    12 Oct 2026, 12:10 UTC

    Study results updated

  2. Version 2

    9 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC

    Study data updated · source update from Europe PMC

  3. Version 1

    9 Oct 2026, 03:05 UTC

    First added · source update from Europe PMC

Subjects

Terms as the source lists them.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.