In uncontrolled acromegaly, biochemical control occurred in ten (15%) with pasireotide 40 mg versus none with active control (difference 15.4%, 95% CI 7.6-26.5, p=0.0006).
In plain wordsIn uncontrolled acromegaly, 15% achieved biochemical control with pasireotide 40 mg versus none with continued octreotide or lanreotide.
- Peptide
- Pasireotide
- Outcome
- IncreaseBiochemical control
- Study
n = 133
- Comparator
- Continued octreotide or lanreotide (pooled active control)
- Analysis
- Primary
- Outcome group
- Growth hormone and IGF-1 · Endocrine and hormones
- Studied dose
- 40 mg every 28 days · 24 weeksAs given in this study (human).
Measurements
- Patients achieving biochemical control
- 10 patients
- pasireotide 40 mg
- Patients achieving biochemical control
- 15%
- pasireotide 40 mg
- Absolute difference from control
- 15.4%
- pasireotide 40 mg vs active control
- 95% CI of difference
- 7.6 to 26.5%
- pasireotide 40 mg vs active control
- P value
- 0.0006 p-value
- pasireotide 40 mg vs active control
Source sentences
At 24 weeks, ten (15%) patients in the pasireotide 40 mg group and 13 (20%) patients in the pasireotide 60 mg group achieved biochemical control, compared with no patients in the active control group (absolute difference from control group 15·4%, 95% CI 7·6-26·5, p=0·0006 for pasireotide 40 mg group…
3 context sentences(design, population, supporting numbers)
We randomly assigned patients in a 1:1:1 ratio with an interactive voice-web response system to receive 40 mg pasireotide long-acting release once every 28 days for 24 weeks, 60 mg pasireotide long-acting release once every 28 days for 24 weeks, or continued treatment with octreotide or lanreotide (active control).
Efficacy analyses were based on intention to treat.
Between Dec 17, 2010, and Aug 6, 2012, 198 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to pasireotide 40 mg (n=65), pasireotide 60 mg (n=65), or active control (n=68) groups.