Trial · Interventional
RecruitingPhase 4Registry dataWaiting on Atrial Fibrillation Intervention Therapy (WAIT) Study
Short name WAIT
Overview
- Status
- Recruiting
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Enrollment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Emma Svennberg · Other
- Design
- Randomized · Single masking
- Countries
1 country
Sweden
- Start
- 23 Mar 2026
- Primary completion
- 30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Completion
- 30 Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2025
- Last update posted
- 10 Aug 2026
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation (AF) · Obesity & Overweight
Timeline
1 trial · 1 ongoing
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 4
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder and is associated with symptoms, reduced quality of life, heart failure, stroke, and a high risk of recurrence after catheter ablation. Many patients scheduled for their first ablation are overweight or have obesity, which is one of the strongest predictors of AF recurrence. Weight loss and risk-factor management are known to improve the outcome of ablation, but lifestyle changes are often difficult to achieve in routine care. Semaglutide (Wegovy®) is a GLP-1 receptor agonist approved in the EU for weight management. It has been shown to produce substantial and sustained weight loss and to improve metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors. Whether treatment with semaglutide before AF ablation can improve long-term rhythm outcomes has never been tested in a randomized clinical trial. The WAIT-AF study is a randomized, open-label trial with blinded endpoint assessment. The study includes adults with AF who are scheduled for their first catheter ablation and have a BMI ≥30 kg/m², or ≥27 kg/m² with at least one additional cardiovascular risk factor (such as hypertension, diabetes and dyslipidemia). A total of 200 participants will be enrolled. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either standard care or semaglutide (plus lifestyle advice) prior to their scheduled ablation. Semaglutide is administered according to the approved EU label with gradual dose escalation. All participants receive an implantable loop recorder (ILR) before ablation to continuously monitor heart rhythm throughout the study. The primary objective is to determine whether semaglutide improves arrhythmia-free survival 12 months after AF ablation. Recurrence is defined as AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting ≥30 seconds on continuous ILR monitoring, excluding the standard 3-month blanking period. Secondary outcomes include weight loss, changes in blood pressure, AF symptoms, quality of life, AF burden, need for repeat ablation, hospitalizations for cardiovascular causes, and changes in metabolic risk factors. The study also evaluates safety and tolerability of semaglutide in this patient population. The study aims to determine whether targeted weight management with semaglutide before AF ablation can improve long-term rhythm outcomes and overall cardiovascular health. If successful, this strategy may offer a new approach to optimizing treatment and improving the results of catheter ablation for patients with AF and overweight or obesity
Interventions
- Semaglutide 2.4 mgDrug
- Standard medical treatmentBehavioral
Arms2
Experimental
Randomized to Semaglutide
Participants randomized to the active arm receive once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide (Wegovy®) initiated at 0.25 mg and uptitrated to a target dose of 2.4 mg as tolerated, according to the approved SmPC. Treatment begins ≥3 months before the planned first catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Participants receive structured lifestyle and weight-management advice in accordance with routine clinical practice.
Active comparator
Standard of care
Participants randomized to the standard-of-care arm receive routine clinical management for atrial fibrillation and weight-related comorbidities without GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy. Usual care may include lifestyle counselling, blood pressure and lipid management, treatment of dysglycaemia, and guideline-directed preparation for first-time catheter ablation. No trial-specific medicinal product is administered. Pa
Primary outcomes1
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months after catheter ablation, excluding the 3-month blanking period, with recurrence defined as any ILR-detected AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia ≥30 seconds.
Time frame · 12 months post-ablation
Registry description
Arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months after catheter ablation, excluding the 3-month blanking period, with recurrence defined as any ILR-detected AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia ≥30 seconds.
Secondary outcomes(19)
Atrial fibrillation burden (%) measured by implantable loop recorder
Time frame · At ablation and at 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Atrial fibrillation burden measured using continuous monitoring from an implantable loop recorder (ILR). AF burden is defined as the percentage of total monitored time spent in atrial fibrillation during each predefined assessment window.
Per protocol analysis of the primary outcome
Time frame · 12 months post-ablation
Registry description
Assessment of arrhythmia-free survival at 12 months post-ablation in participants who completed the study without major protocol deviations. Recurrence is defined identically to the primary ITT analysis (ILR-detected AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia ≥30 seconds after the blanking period). This analysis evaluates the treatment effect under optimal adherence.
Time to first arrhythmia recurrence after the blanking period
Time frame · From month 3 to month 12 post-ablation.
Registry description
Time from the end of the 3-month post-ablation blanking period to the first ILR-detected episode of atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting ≥30 seconds. This endpoint evaluates the durability of rhythm control beyond the blanking period.
Number of repeat ablations required to achieve sinus rhythm
Time frame · From index ablation to 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Total number of additional catheter ablation procedures performed per participant after the index ablation in order to restore or maintain sinus rhythm. This endpoint compares the need for redo ablations between the intervention and standard-of-care groups.
Freedom from symptomatic AF without redo ablation
Time frame · From index ablation to 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Proportion of participants who remain free from symptomatic atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia without requiring a repeat ablation procedure. Symptomatic episodes are defined by patient-reported symptoms corroborated by rhythm documentation. This endpoint evaluates clinically meaningful rhythm control without the need for additional invasive therapy.
Symptom burden using questionnaires at baseline, ablation, 12 months
Time frame · At baseline, at the time of ablation, and at 12 months post-ablation
Registry description
Assessment of atrial fibrillation-related symptom burden and functional impact using the AFEQT and AFSS validated questionnaires. Changes in symptom and quality-of-life scores will be compared between groups to evaluate improvement over time. Each questionnaire will be reported as a separate score.
Quality of life changes using RAND-36
Time frame · At baseline, at the time of ablation, and at 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Assessment of changes in health-related quality of life using the RAND-36 questionnaire. A clinically meaningful change is defined as an improvement of approximately 3-5 points in any RAND-36 domain. This endpoint evaluates the impact of the intervention on physical, emotional, and functional well-being over time.
Weight reduction and BMI category at follow-up
Time frame · At the time of ablation and at 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Body weight (kg) and height (cm) will be measured using standard clinical equipment. Height and weight will be combined to calculate Body Mass Index (BMI) in kg/m², which will be the single reported value for this outcome. The endpoint is the proportion of participants who meet either of the following criteria: ≥10% reduction in baseline body weight (kg) BMI \<27 kg/m² (kg/m²) Only the derived values (weight change % and BMI) are reported for this outcome; height and weight are not reported as separate outcome measures
Blood pressure reduction
Time frame · At baseline, at the time of ablation, and at 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Change in systolic blood pressure in mmHg compared with baseline, and diastolic blood pressure in mmHg. The secondary outcome will focus on the proportion of participants achieving \>10% blood pressure reduction in either systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure will be reported separately in mmHg. Measurements are performed using standardized clinical procedures to evaluate the intervention's impact on blood pressure control.
Change in routine clinical blood biomarkers
Time frame · At routine clinical assessments nearest to baseline, ablation, and 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Changes in individual blood biomarkers measured as part of routine clinical care, including: Fasting glucose (mmol/L; standard chemistry assay) HbA1c (mmol/mol; HPLC/immunoassay) Serum creatinine (µmol/L; enzymatic/Jaffe assay) NT-proBNP (ng/L; immunoassay) Each biomarker will be analysed separately using its native unit of measure. Descriptive only. No study-specific blood sampling is performed.
Complications during and after the ablation procedure
Time frame · During the ablation procedure and through 12 months post ablation.
Registry description
Incidence of procedure-related complications occurring during the catheter ablation or within the post-procedural follow-up period. Events may include vascular complications, pericardial effusion, tamponade, stroke/TIA, transient arrhythmias, anesthesia-related events, or other clinically relevant adverse outcomes, as documented in medical records. This endpoint compares procedural safety between study groups.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) pre- and post-ablation
Time frame · At routine clinical echocardiography closest to baseline and the post-ablation assessment (up to 12 months).
Registry description
Assessment of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction from before to after the ablation procedure, based solely on echocardiograms performed as part of routine clinical care. No study-specific imaging is required; data will be included only for participants who undergo a post-ablation echocardiogram in standard practice. This endpoint evaluates whether the intervention influences cardiac function over time.
Prevalence of diabetes, renal failure, and heart failure
Time frame · At baseline and at 12 months post-ablation (via clinical records and registry data).
Registry description
Assessment of the proportion of participants with diabetes, renal failure, or heart failure using information from routine clinical care, medical records, and linked registry data. No study-specific testing is performed. This endpoint describes baseline comorbidity burden and identifies new or worsening diagnoses captured through standard care or registries.
Cardiovascular hospitalization
Time frame · From index ablation to 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Incidence of hospitalizations due to cardiovascular causes, identified through routine clinical records and national or regional registry data. Events may include admissions for arrhythmias, heart failure, acute coronary syndromes, or other cardiovascular conditions. No study-specific assessments are required.
All-cause hospitalization
Time frame · From index ablation to 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Incidence of hospital admissions for any cause, identified through routine clinical records and national or regional registry data. This endpoint evaluates the broader healthcare impact of the intervention beyond cardiovascular events. No study-specific assessments are required.
Change in antiarrhythmic drug use
Time frame · From baseline to 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Assessment of initiation, discontinuation, or dose changes in antiarrhythmic medications (e.g., class I or III agents, beta-blockers) based on routine clinical records. This endpoint evaluates differences in pharmacologic rhythm control requirements between groups.
Ablation procedure duration
Time frame · During the index ablation procedure.
Registry description
Total duration of the catheter ablation procedure, extracted from routine procedural reports. This endpoint evaluates whether pre-ablation metabolic optimization influences procedural complexity.
Fluoroscopy time and radiation dose
Time frame · During the index ablation procedure.
Registry description
Total fluoroscopy exposure time and radiation dose recorded during the index ablation procedure, as documented in routine procedural logs. This endpoint assesses potential differences in radiation exposure related to patient characteristics or weight loss. Fluoroscopy time (minutes) and radiation dose (mGy or mGy·cm²) will be reported as separate values.
Healthcare utilization
Time frame · From randomization to 12 months post-ablation.
Registry description
Assessment of overall healthcare use, including outpatient cardiology visits, emergency department visits, and telephone/remote consultations. Data will be obtained from routine clinical records and linked regional or national healthcare registries. This endpoint evaluates whether the intervention affects healthcare demand and resource use. No study-specific visits or assessments are required.
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- All
- Age
- from 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.