Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 32
| Group | Value (percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -0.85 | 0.787 |
| 3/6 mg Mazdutide | -7.33 | 0.937 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | -15.6 | 0.744 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | -18.1 | 0.965 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry dataUnited States
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
A Study of LY3305677 Compared With Placebo in Adult Participants With Obesity or Overweight
NCT0612480717 Nov 2023 to 9 Jul 2025
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The main purpose of this study, performed under a master protocol W8M-MC-CWMM (NCT06143956), is to investigate weight management efficacy and safety with Mazdutide compared with placebo and in adult participants with obesity or overweight. The study will last about 62 weeks.
Experimental
3/6 Milligrams (mg) Mazdutide
Participants received once-weekly subcutaneous Mazdutide with dose escalation until the target dose (3 or 6 mg) was achieved, starting at 1.5 mg from Weeks 0-3, followed by 3 mg from Weeks 4-31, then 6 mg from Weeks 32-48.
Experimental
10 mg Mazdutide
Participants received once-weekly subcutaneous Mazdutide with dose escalation until the target dose (10 mg) was achieved, starting at 1.5 mg from Weeks 0-3, followed by 3 mg from Weeks 4-7, 6 mg from Weeks 8-11, 8 mg from Weeks 12-15, and then 10 mg from Weeks 16-48.
Experimental
16 mg Mazdutide
Participants received once-weekly subcutaneous Mazdutide with dose escalation until the target dose (16 mg) was achieved, starting at 1.5 mg from Weeks 0-3, followed by 3 mg from Weeks 4-7, 6 mg from Weeks 8-11, 9 mg from Weeks 12-15, 12 mg from Weeks 16-19, and then16 mg from Weeks 20-48.
Placebo comparator
Placebo
Participants received Mazdutide matched placebo subcutaneously once weekly from Weeks 0 to 48.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 32
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32
Least squares means were calculated using an MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline\*Time + Strata\*Time + Treatment\*Time, where Treatment and Strata are factors. Variance-Covariance structure (Percent Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Strata is defined by joint levels of Sex and Baseline BMI (\<=30, \>30 kg/m\^2).
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 48
Time frame · Baseline, Week 48
Least squares means were calculated using an MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline\*Time + Strata\*Time + Treatment\*Time, where Treatment and Strata are factors. Variance-Covariance structure (Percent Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Strata is defined by joint levels of Sex and Baseline BMI (\<=30, \>30 kg/m\^2).
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Least squares means were calculated using an MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline\*Time + Strata\*Time + Treatment\*Time, where Treatment and Strata are factors. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Strata is defined by joint levels of Sex and Baseline BMI (\<=30, \>30 kg/m\^2).
Mean Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥5% Body Weight Reduction
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Mean percentage of participants who achieve ≥5% body weight reduction was calculated using imputed data with the logistic regression model Variable = Baseline + Treatment + Strata (Sex), where Treatment and Strata (Sex) are factors. Mean percentage of participants was calculated by combining percentage of participants achieving target at week 32 and week 48 respectively in imputed data sets using Rubin's rule.
Mean Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥10% Body Weight Reduction
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Mean percentage of participants who achieve ≥10% body weight reduction was calculated using imputed data with the logistic regression model Variable = Baseline + Treatment + Strata (Sex), where Treatment and Strata (Sex) are factors. Mean percentage of participants was calculated by combining percentage of participants achieving target at week 32 and week 48 respectively in imputed data sets using Rubin's rule.
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Least squares means were calculated using an MMRM model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline\*Time + Strata\*Time + Treatment\*Time, where Treatment and Strata are factors. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Strata is defined by joint levels of Sex and Baseline BMI (\<=30, \>30 kg/m\^2).
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Anti-drug Antibodies (TE-ADAs)
Time frame · Baseline up to week 56
Blood samples were tested to determine if a participant reacted to Mazdutide by producing anti-Mazdutide antibodies. A participant is TE ADA evaluable if there is at least one non-missing test result for ADA for each of the baseline period and the postbaseline period. A TE ADA evaluable participant is considered to be TE ADA+ if the participant has at least one postbaseline titer that is a 4-fold or greater increase in titer from baseline measurement. If baseline result is ADA Not Present, then the subject is TE ADA+ if there is at least one postbaseline result of ADA Present with titer \>=1:20.
Pharmacokinetics (PK): Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Mazdutide at Steady State
Time frame · Predose at Week 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, Week 48; Post dose (2 to 6 hours after dosing) at Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
PK samples were analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate AUC at steady state. Data presented are Geometric mean with 90% prediction interval.
PK: Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Mazdutide at Steady State
Time frame · Predose at Week 0, Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24, Week 32, Week 48; Post dose (2 to 6 hours after dosing) at Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
PK samples were analyzed using a population PK approach to estimate Cmax at steady state. Data presented are Geometric mean with 90% prediction interval.
Change From Baseline in Liver Fat Content (LFC) by Magnetic Resonance Imaging Proton Density Fat Fraction (MRI-PDFF) in Participants With Baseline LFC >=5%
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Least squares means were calculated using an MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log(Actual Measurement/Baseline) = Treatment\*Time + log(Baseline)\*Time + Strata\*Time, where Treatment and Strata are factors. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Strata is defined by joint levels of Sex and Baseline BMI (\<=30, \>30 kg/m\^2).
Percent Change From Baseline in Liver Fat Content by MRI-PDFF in Participants With Baseline LFC >=5%
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Least squares means were calculated using an MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log (Actual Measurement/Baseline) = Treatment\*Time + log (Baseline)\*Time + Strata\*Time, where Treatment and Strata are factors. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Strata is defined by joint levels of Sex and Baseline BMI (\<=30, \>30 kg/m\^2).
Change From Baseline in Liver Fat Content by MRI-PDFF in Participants With Baseline LFC >=10%
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Least squares means were calculated using an MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log (Actual Measurement/Baseline) = Treatment\*Time + log (Baseline)\*Time + Strata\*Time, where Treatment and Strata are factors. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Strata is defined by joint levels of Sex and Baseline BMI (\<=30, \>30 kg/m\^2).
Percent Change From Baseline in Liver Fat Content by MRI-PDFF in Participants With Baseline LFC >=10%
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Least squares means were calculated using an MMRM model for post-baseline measures: log (Actual Measurement/Baseline) = Treatment\*Time + log (Baseline)\*Time + Strata\*Time, where Treatment and Strata are factors. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured. Strata is defined by joint levels of Sex and Baseline BMI (\<=30, \>30 kg/m\^2).
Mean Percentage of Participants With Baseline Liver Fat Content (LFC) >= 5% Who Achieved >30% Relative Reduction in LFC
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
mean Percentage of participants with baseline liver fat content (LFC) \>= 5% who achieved \>30% relative reduction in LFC was estimated using imputed data with the logistic regression model Variable = Baseline + Treatment + Strata (Sex), where Treatment and Strata (Sex) are factors. Mean percentage of participants was calculated by combining percentage of participants achieving target at week 32 and week 48 respectively in imputed data sets using Rubin's rule.
Mean Percentage of Participants With Baseline Liver Fat Content (LFC) >=10% Who Achieved >30% Relative Reduction in LFC
Time frame · Baseline, Week 32, Week 48
Mean Percentage of participants with baseline liver fat content (LFC) \>=10% who achieved \>30% relative reduction in LFC was estimated using imputed data with the logistic regression model Variable = Baseline + Treatment + Strata (Sex), where Treatment and Strata (Sex) are factors. Mean percentage of participants was calculated by combining percentage of participants achieving target at week 32 and week 48 respectively in imputed data sets using Rubin's rule.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -0.85 | 0.787 |
| 3/6 mg Mazdutide | -7.33 | 0.937 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | -15.6 | 0.744 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | -18.1 | 0.965 |
| Group | Value (percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -0.047 | 1.059 |
| 3/6 mg Mazdutide | -10.54 | 1.498 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | -19.2 | 1.076 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | -22.3 | 1.424 |
| Group | Value (Kilograms (Kg)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -0.98 | 0.882 |
| 3/6 mg Mazdutide | -7.79 | 1.011 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | -16.1 | 0.779 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | -19.2 | 1.037 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | 23.97 | 6.99 |
| 3/6 mg Mazdutide | 67.64 | 8.70 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | 96.10 | 3.57 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | 92.23 | 4.30 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | 8.73 | 4.53 |
| 3/6 mg Mazdutide | 45.43 | 9.18 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | 85.95 | 5.67 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | 77.08 | 6.45 |
| Group | Value (kilogram per square metre (kg/m^2)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -0.32 | 0.305 |
| 3/6 mg Mazdutide | -2.84 | 0.376 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | -5.81 | 0.281 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | -6.86 | 0.372 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 5 |
| 3/6 Milligrams (mg) Mazdutide | 3 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | 10 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | 11 |
| Group | Value (nanogram*hour per milliliter (ng*h/mL)) |
|---|---|
| 3 mg Mazdutide | 93800 |
| 6 mg Mazdutide | 190000 |
| 10 mg Mazdutide | 340000 |
| 16 mg Mazdutide | 537000 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| PlaceboParticipants received Mazdutide matched placebo subcutaneously once weekly from Weeks 0 to 48 | 0 / 47 | 1 / 47 | 34 / 47 |
| 3/6 Milligrams (mg) MazdutideParticipants received once-weekly subcutaneous Mazdutide with dose escalation until the target dose (3 or 6 mg) was achieved, starting at 1.5 mg from Weeks 0-3, followed by 3 mg from Weeks 4-31, then 6 mg from Weeks 32-48. | 0 / 32 | 1 / 32 | 29 / 32 |
| 10 mg MazdutideParticipants received once-weekly subcutaneous Mazdutide with dose escalation until the target dose (10 mg) was achieved, starting at 1.5 mg from Weeks 0-3, followed by 3 mg from Weeks 4-7, 6 mg from Weeks 8-11, 8 mg from Weeks 12-15, and then 10 mg from Weeks 16-48. | 0 / 47 | 1 / 47 | 37 / 47 |
| 16 mg MazdutideParticipants received once-weekly subcutaneous Mazdutide with dose escalation until the target dose (16 mg) was achieved, starting at 1.5 mg from Weeks 0-3, followed by 3 mg from Weeks 4-7, 6 mg from Weeks 8-11, 9 mg from Weeks 12-15, 12 mg from Weeks 16-19, and then 16 mg from Weeks 20-48. | 0 / 51 | 2 / 51 | 45 / 51 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2026
Hsia et al. 2026The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology
PMID 42628555DOI 10.1016/s2213-8587(26)00160-9PUB-42628555
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated