Change From Baseline in HbA1c
| Group | Value (percentage of HbA1c) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | -1.59 | 0.073 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | -0.69 | 0.074 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 4Results postedRegistry dataShort name SURPASS-SWITCH
United States, Belgium, Germany, Mexico, Romania
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of switching from weekly dulaglutide to weekly tirzepatide compared to increasing the dulaglutide dose in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Experimental
15 Milligram (mg) Tirzepatide or Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Participants received tirzepatide administered as subcutaneous (SC) injection via a single-dose pen (SDP) once weekly (QW) for 40 weeks. The starting dose of tirzepatide was 2.5 mg QW, which increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks (2.5 mg to 5 mg to 7.5 mg to 10 mg to 12.5mg to 15 mg) until 15 mg or MTD was reached.
Active comparator
4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD
Participants received dulaglutide administered as SC injection via a SDP QW for 40 weeks. The starting dose of dulaglutide was either 1.5 mg QW, which increased by 1.5 mg every 4 weeks (1.5 mg to 3 mg to 4.5 mg) until 4.5 mg or MTD was reached, or 3.0 mg QW, which increased to 4.5 mg after 4 weeks or until MTD was reached.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change From Baseline in HbA1c
Time frame · Baseline, Week 40
HbA1c is the glycated fraction of hemoglobin A. HbA1c is measured primarily to identify average plasma glucose concentration over prolonged periods of time. Least squares (LS) mean was calculated using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Geographic Region 1 + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares). Variance-Covariance structure (Actual Value) = Unstructured. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame · Baseline, Week 40
LSMean was calculated using MMRM for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Geographic Region 1 + Baseline HbA1c Group + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares). Variance-Covariance structure (Actual Value) = Unstructured. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <7%
Time frame · Week 40
The percentage of participants was calculated by dividing the number of participants reaching target HbA1c by the total number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. Analyses included all participants having non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable. Missing endpoint measures are imputed by predictions from an MMRM analysis model using observed data in the efficacy analysis set and adjusted for Baseline HbA1c Value, Baseline SGLT2i use(Yes/No), Treatment, Visit, and Treatment by Visit interaction.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <=6.5%
Time frame · Week 40
The percentage of participants was calculated by dividing the number of participants reaching target HbA1c by the total number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. Analyses included all participants having non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable. Logistic regression model was used with missing endpoint measures imputed by predictions from an MMRM analysis model using observed data in the efficacy analysis set and adjusted for baseline HbA1c, geographic region 1, number of background OAMs in group 1, dulaglutide dose at screening, and treatment as factors.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <5.7%
Time frame · Week 40
The percentage of participants was calculated by dividing the number of participants reaching target HbA1c by the total number of participants analyzed, multiplied by 100. Analyses included all participants having non-missing baseline and at least one non-missing post-baseline value of the response variable. Logistic regression model was used with missing endpoint measures imputed by predictions from an MMRM analysis model using observed data in the efficacy analysis set and adjusted for baseline HbA1c, geographic region 1, number of background OAMs in group 1, dulaglutide dose at screening, and treatment as factors.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss From Baseline of ≥5%
Time frame · Week 40
Missing endpoint measures are imputed by predictions using observed data in the efficacy analysis set from the same treatment group through an MMRM analysis model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographic Region 1 + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Baseline HBA1C Group + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss From Baseline of ≥10%
Time frame · Week 40
Missing endpoint measures are imputed by predictions using observed data in the efficacy analysis set from the same treatment group through an MMRM analysis model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographic Region 1 + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Baseline HBA1C Group + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve Weight Loss From Baseline of ≥15%
Time frame · Week 40
Missing endpoint measures are imputed by predictions using observed data in the efficacy analysis set from the same treatment group through an MMRM analysis model for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Geographic Region 1 + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Baseline HBA1C Group + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Composite Endpoint (HbA1c <=6.5% & Weight Loss >=10% & No-Hypoglycemia)
Time frame · Week 40
A composite endpoint is defined as HbA1c ≤ 6.5%, weight loss ≥ 10%, and no hypoglycemia, defined as blood glucose (BG) \<3.0 millimole/liter (mmol/L) and/or severe hypoglycemia. Missing endpoint measures are imputed by predictions using observed data in the efficacy analysis set from the same treatment group through an MMRM analysis model for post-baseline measures: For HbA1c: Variable = Baseline + Geographic Region 1 + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time. For Weight: Variable = Baseline + Geographic Region 1 + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Baseline HbA1c Group + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Serum Glucose (FSG)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 40
LSMean was calculated using the ANCOVA model for endpoint measures: Variable = Baseline + A1CGR1 + DULDSCRN + OAMGR1 + REGION1 + Treatment (Type I sum of squares).
Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Time frame · Baseline, Week 40
LSMean was calculated using MMRM for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Geographic Region 1 + Baseline HbA1c Group + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares). Variance-Covariance structure (Actual Value) = Unstructured. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured.
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 40
Change from Baseline in BMI is presented. LSMean was calculated using MMRM for post-baseline measures: Variable = Baseline + Number of Background OAMs Group 1 + Dulaglutide Dose at Screening + Geographic Region 1 + Baseline HbA1c Group + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares). Variance-Covariance structure (Actual Value) = Unstructured. Variance-Covariance structure (Change from Baseline) = Unstructured.
Change From Baseline in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite CT) - Physical Functioning Score
Time frame · Baseline, Week 40
The IWQOL-Lite-CT is a 20-item, obesity-specific PRO (patient-reported outcome) instrument developed for use in obesity clinical trials. It assesses 2 primary domains of obesity-related health-related quality of life (HRQoL): physical (7 items, where 5 of the items comprise the physical functioning sub-domain) and psychosocial (13 items). The IWQOL-Lite-CT provides composite scores for each domain, as well as a total score, all ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores reflect better levels of functioning. This endpoint shows results for 'physical function domain.'
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percentage of HbA1c) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | -1.59 | 0.073 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | -0.69 | 0.074 |
| Group | Value (kilograms (kg)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | -11.0 | 0.48 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | -3.6 | 0.49 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | 84.21 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | 52.38 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | 73.88 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | 22.73 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | 21.64 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | 2.27 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | 84.33 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | 37.40 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | 58.21 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | 6.87 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTD | 27.61 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTD | 0.76 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 mg Tirzepatide or MTDParticipants received 15 mg of tirzepatide administered as SC injection via a SDP QW for 40 weeks. The starting dose of tirzepatide was 2.5 mg QW, which increased by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks (2.5 mg to 5 mg to 7.5 mg to 10 mg to 12.5 mg to 15 mg) until 15 mg or MTD was reached. | 1 / 139 | 10 / 139 | 77 / 139 |
| 4.5 mg Dulaglutide or MTDParticipants received 4.5 mg of dulaglutide administered as SC injection via a SDP QW for 40 weeks. The starting dose of dulaglutide was 0.75 mg QW, which increased by 1.5 mg every 4 weeks (0.75 mg to 1.5 mg to 3 mg to 4.5 mg) until 4.5 mg or MTD was reached. | 1 / 143 | 10 / 143 | 79 / 143 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
2 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2026
Violante-Ortiz et al. 2026BMJ open diabetes research & care
PMID 41912265PMC13052782DOI 10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005711PUB-41912265
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2025
Billings et al. 2025Annals of internal medicinecited by 13
PMID 40183678DOI 10.7326/annals-24-03849PUB-40183678
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated