Trial · Interventional
Status unknownPhase 2Registry dataA Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Afamelanotide in Patients With Xeroderma Pigmentosum C and V
Overview
- Status
- Status unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Enrollment
- 6 participants (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Clinuvel Europe Limited · Industry
- Design
- Allocation not applicable · Open label (no masking)
- Countries
2 countries
Belgium, Spain
- Start
- 28 Mar 2022
- Primary completion
- Jun 2024 (estimated)
- Completion
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 May 2022
- Last update posted
- 21 Sept 2023
- Conditions
- Xeroderma Pigmentosum
Timeline
1 trial
- Completed
- Ongoing
- Not yet recruiting
- Stopped
- Estimated dates (est.)
- Results posted
- Ph 2
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Afamelanotide in Patients With Xeroderma Pigmentosum C and V
NCT0537023528 Mar 2022 to est. Dec 2024
Registry summary
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The CUV152 study will evaluate the safety of afamelanotide in XP-C and XP-V patients, as well as the drug's ability to assist reparative processes following ultraviolet (UV) provoked DNA damage of the skin. It will assess whether SCENESSE® increases the amount of UV light needed to cause DNA damage of skin cells, as well as the extent of skin repair before and after treatment.
Interventions
- AfamelanotideDrug
Arms1
Experimental
Afamelanotide
Primary outcomes2
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change in minimal erythema dose (MED) in patients with XP-C.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
MED is the lowest dose of UV light that causes reddening of the skin.
Change in MED in patients with XP-V.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
MED is the lowest dose of UV light that causes reddening of the skin.
Secondary outcomes(14)
Changes in UV-induced DNA damage, as assessed by quantification of UV photoproduct levels in patients with XP-C.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
Analysis of UV photoproducts from skin samples.
Changes in UV-induced DNA damage repair capacity, as assessed by quantification of DNA repair mechanisms in patients with XP-C.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
Analysis of DNA repair mechanisms from skin samples.
Changes in UV-induced DNA damage, as assessed by quantification of UV photoproduct levels in patients with XP-V.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
Analysis of UV photoproducts from skin samples.
Changes in UV-induced DNA damage repair capacity, as assessed by quantification of DNA repair mechanisms in patients with XP-V.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
Analysis of DNA repair mechanisms from skin samples.
Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-C (A).
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-V (A)
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-C (B).
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-V (B).
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-C (C).
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Change in skin disease severity in patients with XP-V (C).
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
The higher the score, the more severe the disease.
Change in quality of life assessed by a disease specific tool (A) in patients with XP-C.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
Higher scores represent worse health-related quality of life.
Change in quality of life assessed by a disease specific tool (A) in patients with XP-V.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
Higher scores represent worse health-related quality of life.
Change in quality of life assessed by a validated global quality of life tool (B) in patients with XP-C.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
Score calculated in impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impaired quality of life.
Change in quality of life assessed by a validated global quality of life tool (B) in patients with XP-V.
Time frame · From baseline to day 76.
Registry description
Score calculated in impairment percentages, with higher numbers indicating greater impaired quality of life.
Posted results
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
No results are posted for this trial.
A trial that is still running, or that stopped early, may post results later.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies0
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Eligibility
Who could join, as posted.
- Sex
- All
- Age
- from 18 Years up to 75 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.