Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight
| Group | Value (Percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | -14.4 | 0.98 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | -19.9 | 1.01 |
| Placebo | -2.4 | 1.00 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name SURMOUNT-CN
China
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This is a study of tirzepatide in Chinese participants without Type 2 Diabetes who have obesity or overweight. The main purpose is to learn more about how tirzepatide affects body weight.
Experimental
10 Milligrams (mg) Tirzepatide
Participants received maintenance dose 10 mg with dose escalation starting from 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, and then 10 mg tirzepatide administered subcutaneously (SC) once weekly (QW).
Experimental
15 mg Tirzepatide
Participants received maintenance dose 15 mg with dose escalation starting from 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, 12.5 mg and then 15 mg tirzepatide administered SC QW.
Placebo comparator
Placebo
Participants received matching placebo SC QW.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
Mean Percent Change from Baseline in Body Weight. Least squares (LS) mean was determined using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of Comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥5% Body Weight Reduction
Time frame · Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve ≥5% Body Weight Reduction. A logistic regression model was used for this analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight
Time frame · Baseline, Week 20
Mean Change from Baseline in Body Weight. LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥10% Body Weight Reduction
Time frame · Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve ≥10% Body Weight Reduction. A logistic regression model was used for this analysis.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieve ≥15% Body Weight Reduction
Time frame · Week 52
Percentage of Participants who Achieve ≥15% Body Weight Reduction. A logistic regression model was used for this analysis.
Mean Change From Baseline in Waist Circumference
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
Mean Change from Baseline in Waist Circumference. LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Absolute Body Weight
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
Mean Change from Baseline in Absolute Body Weight. LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
Mean Change from Baseline in BMI. LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
Mean Change from Baseline in HbA1c. LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Glucose (FSG)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
Mean Change from Baseline in FSG. LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Short-Form-36 Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Acute Form Physical Functioning Domain Score
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
The SF-36v2 acute form, 1-week recall assesses participants' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) on 8 domains: Physical Functioning, Role-Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional, and Mental Health. Information from these 8 domains is further aggregated into 2 health component summary scores: Physical Component Summary and Mental Component Summary. Items are answered on Likert scales of varying lengths. Scoring of each domain and both summary scores are norm based and presented in the form of T scores, with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10; higher scores indicate better levels of function and/or better health. Range cannot be specified in norm-based scores. LS mean was determined using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model using Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Impact of Weight on Quality of Life-Lite Clinical Trials Version (IWQOL-Lite-CT) Physical Function Composite Score
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
The IWQOL Lite-CT consists of 20 items, assessing 2 primary domains of obesity related HRQoL: Physical (7 items) and Psychosocial (13 items). A 5-item subset of the Physical domain - the Physical Function composite - is also supported. Items in the Physical Function composite describe physical impacts related to general and specific physical activities. Total score of IWQOL-Lite-CT composite ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better quality of life. LS mean was determined using ANCOVA model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Variable = Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model using log (Actual measurement/Baseline) = log (Baseline) + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model using log (Actual Measurement) = log (Baseline) + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model with Baseline + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Very Low Density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model using log (Actual Measurement) = log (Baseline) + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Triglycerides (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model using log (Actual Measurement) = log (Baseline) + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Free Fatty Acids (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model using log (Actual Measurement) = log (Baseline) + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin (Pooled Doses of Tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg)
Time frame · Baseline, Week 52
LS mean was determined using MMRM model with log (Actual Measurement) = log (Baseline) + Sex + Presence of comorbidities + Treatment + Time + Treatment\*Time (Type III sum of squares) as variables.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | -14.4 | 0.98 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | -19.9 | 1.01 |
| Placebo | -2.4 | 1.00 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | 91.43 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | 92.65 |
| Placebo | 29.41 |
| Group | Value (kilograms (kg)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | -9.0 | 0.59 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | -11.1 | 0.61 |
| Placebo | -1.8 | 0.60 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | 70.0 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | 83.82 |
| Placebo | 14.71 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | 48.57 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | 72.06 |
| Placebo | 2.94 |
| Group | Value (centimeters (cm)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | -11.9 | 0.83 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | -16.4 | 0.85 |
| Placebo | -2.7 | 0.84 |
| Group | Value (kilograms (kg)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | -13.1 | 0.93 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | -18.1 | 0.95 |
| Placebo | -2.1 | 0.94 |
| Group | Value (kilograms per metres squared (kg/m^2)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| 10 mg Tirzepatide | -4.7 | 0.29 |
| 15 mg Tirzepatide | -6.4 | 0.30 |
| Placebo | -0.8 | 0.30 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 mg TirzepatideParticipants received maintenance dose 10 mg with dose escalation starting from 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, and then 10 mg tirzepatide administered SC QW. | 0 / 70 | 3 / 70 | 61 / 70 |
| 15 mg TirzepatideParticipants received maintenance dose 15 mg with dose escalation starting from 2.5 mg, 5 mg, 7.5 mg, 10 mg, 12.5 mg and then 15 mg tirzepatide administered SC QW. | 0 / 71 | 8 / 71 | 56 / 71 |
| PlaceboParticipants received matching placebo SC QW. | 0 / 69 | 6 / 69 | 39 / 69 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2024
Zhao et al. 2024JAMAcited by 108
PMID 38819983PMC11337071DOI 10.1001/jama.2024.9217PUB-38819983
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated