Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) of Tumour Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) at Week 24
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | 62.79 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name PALACE
China
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This study will be conducted to support the registration of the lanreotide Autogel 120 mg formulation in China for the treatment of GEP-NETs and treatment of clinical symptoms of NETs. The study will include a screening period of up to 4 weeks followed by a 48-week intervention period. After completion of the main study period, five participants will continue in a self/partner injection cohort with lanreotide Autogel 120 mg every 28 days for 24 weeks.
Other
lanreotide Autogel 120 mg
Subjects will be treated with lanreotide Autogel® 120mg, every 28 days (+/- 3 days).
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) of Tumour Response Assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) at Week 24
Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24
The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR), confirmed partial response (PR), or continued stable disease (SD) until the time of assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) criteria v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by BICR Within Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48
The PFS was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of the first documented PD measured using RECIST criteria v1.1 and confirmed by BICR, or death from any cause, whichever comes first. The PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Overall Survival (OS) at the End of the Main Intervention Period
Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Week 48 (end of the main intervention period)
The OS was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of death from any cause. The OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time to Progression (TTP) During Main Intervention Period
Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
The TTP was defined as the time from the first administration of study intervention to the date of the first documented PD, or clinical progression confirmed by the investigator. The TTP was assessed by BICR and estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Percentage of Participants Alive and Without Tumour Progressive at Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48
Percentage of participants who were alive and progression free per RECIST v1.1 using BICR assessments at 24 and 48 weeks after first dose of study intervention were reported. The PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The PD was defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Clinical Benefit Rate Assessed by BICR at Week 48
Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Week 48
The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR, confirmed PR, or continued SD until the time of assessment according to RECIST criteria v1.1. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
Overall Response Rate (ORR) at Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR or confirmed PR. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter.
Disease Control Rate (DCR) at Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame · RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 24 and 48
The DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response of confirmed CR, confirmed PR or SD. The CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. The PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter. The SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started.
Number of Participants With Neuroendocrine Tumours (NET)-Related Clinical Symptoms at Weeks 24 and 48
Time frame · Weeks 24 and 48
The presence or absence of endocrine symptoms of NETs (example; flushing, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, weakness, heartburn, nausea, vomiting, sweating, tremor, palpitation, or erythema) were assessed by the investigator at screening. In participants with symptoms of NETs at screening, a baseline assessment of the symptoms experienced in the last 4 weeks was performed by questioning before study intervention administration at Day 1. These symptoms were recorded in the case report form and severity graded upon National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Where, Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= severe, Grade 4= life-threatening and Grade 5= death.
Change From Baseline in Plasma Chromogranin A (CgA) at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Time frame · Baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
The CgA determination was useful for staging, prognosis and follow up, since the serum concentration correlated to the tumour mass. Blood samples were collected to measure circulating CgA.
Change From Baseline in 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (5-HIAA) at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Time frame · Baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Urine samples were collected to measure 5-HIAA.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Assessment at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
Time frame · Baseline (within 28 days before start of study intervention) and Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire for Cancer participants contains 30 single items. For questions 1 to 28, score ranges from 1 to 4 where, 1= not at all, 2= a little, 3= quite a bit and 4= very much. Global health status/QoL contains questions 29 and 30 and score ranges from 1 to 7, where 1= very poor and 7= excellent. Total score ranges from 0 (poor) to 100 (excellent). Higher score indicates a high QoL.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | 62.79 |
| Group | Value (weeks) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | NA |
| Group | Value (weeks) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | NA |
| Group | Value (weeks) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | NA |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | 77.4 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | 58.1 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | 0 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Lanreotide Autogel 120 mg | 69.8 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Intervention Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgAll participants received a fixed dose of lanreotide autogel 120 mg SC injection every 28 days up to 48 weeks. | 2 / 43 | 4 / 43 | 43 / 43 |
| Independent Injection Period: Lanreotide Autogel 120 mgEligible participants received a fixed dose of lanreotide autogel 120 mg SC injection every 28 days for 24 weeks. | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 2 / 5 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated