Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry data

Exenatide Once-weekly as a Treatment for Multiple System Atrophy

Short name MSA

NCTNCT04431713 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other id125591Other id2020-000122-26

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
50 participants (actual)
Sponsor
University College, London · Other
Design
Randomized · Open label (no masking)
Countries
1 country

United Kingdom

Start
16 Sept 2020
Primary completion
22 Mar 2024
Completion
22 Mar 2024
First posted
16 Jun 2020
Last update posted
27 Jun 2025
Conditions
Multiple System Atrophy

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
202020212022202320242025
  1. Ph 2

    MSA

    NCT04431713

    16 Sept 2020 to 22 Mar 2024

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

Fifty patients with early stage Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) will be recruited and randomised to receive Exenatide injections, or to act as controls in this open label trial. For half of the patients, Exenatide will be given as a once weekly subcutaneous injection in addition to participant's regular medication. All patients will continue to receive standard of care treatment for MSA. Detailed assessments will be made of all patients at baseline and periodically for a total of 48 weeks. The primary endpoint will be the difference in total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) score (Parts I and II) at 48 weeks comparing Exenatide treated to best medically treated patients (controls). Secondary measures will include adverse event reports, self-completed questionnaires, and blood test results. Aside from these assessments, all patients will continue any regular MSA medications throughout the trial with adjustments made only according to clinical need. Standard of care treatment for patients on non IMP arm will be dependant on the patients individual symptoms - there is no broad standard treatment for every patient.

Interventions

  • Exenatide Pen Injector [Bydureon]Drug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    Exenatide

  • No intervention

    Standard of care

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Change in UMSARS Score (Parts I+II) From Baseline

    Time frame · Baseline and 48 weeks

    Registry description

    The primary endpoint is the total Unified Multiple System Atrophy Rating Scale (UMSARS) score (Parts I and II), exploring the change from baseline overtime (evaluated at 48-weeks). Part I is a 12-item historical interview (max score 48) and Part II is a 14-item clinical examination (max score 56). Part I and II are added together to give a total score, which can range from 0 to 104. Higher scores indicate worse disease severity.

Secondary outcomes(8)
  1. Loss of Independent Ambulation

    Time frame · 48 weeks

    Registry description

    Proportion of participants with loss of independent ambulation, defined by a score of 4 on the UMSARS-I Item 7 (walking) at 48 weeks.

  2. Multiple System Atrophy Quality of Life (MSA-QoL) Scale

    Time frame · 48 weeks

    Registry description

    The Multiple System Atrophy Quality of Life (MSA-QoL) scale measured health-related quality of life across three subscales (motor, nonmotor, and emotional/social functioning). Each item (40 in total) has five increasing levels of impairment (0 to 4), with 0 representing no impairment and 4 representing extreme impairment. Scores for the three subscales were generated by summing items and transformed to a range of 0 to 100 (100 × \[(observed score minus min possible score)/(max possible score minus min possible score)\]).

  3. Number of Falls

    Time frame · 48 weeks

    Registry description

    Number of falls reported by the participant at 48-weeks.

  4. Milestones on UMSARS Part 1 (Speech, Swallow and Falling)

    Time frame · 48 weeks

    Registry description

    The UMSARS Part 1 is 12-item sub-scale which comprises a historic review of disease-related impairments. A single score using a 0 (no impairment) to 4 (severe impairment) was generated for each item (max score 48 points). We examined the proportion of participants reaching a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS item 1 (speech), item 2 (swallowing) and item 8 (falling) by 48 weeks.

  5. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale

    Time frame · 48 weeks

    Registry description

    The CGI evaluates the change from the initiation of treatment on a seven-point scale (1 = =very much improved to 7 = very much worse since the initiation of treatment). A single score at 48 weeks was recorded.

  6. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

    Time frame · 48 weeks

    Registry description

    The MoCA is a brief cognitive scale (scored out of 0-30 points). A score of 26 or more reflects normal cognitive abilities, whereas lower scores indicate cognitive impairment. The difference between groups (total score out of 30) was explored at 48 weeks.

  7. UMSARS Part IV

    Time frame · Score at 48 Weeks

    Registry description

    The UMSARS Part 4 measures global disability (1 item) scored from 1 (completely independent) to 5 (totally dependent and helpless. Bedridden).

  8. Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II)

    Time frame · 48 weeks

    Registry description

    The BDI-II is a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the severity of depression symptomatology (scored out of 0-63 points). A score of 13 or less indicated minimal, 14-19 indicated mild, 20-28 indicated moderate and 29-63 indicated severe depression. The difference between groups was explored at 48 weeks.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeMean· Baseline and 48 weeks

Change in UMSARS Score (Parts I+II) From Baseline

GroupValue (score on a scale)
Exenatide6.1
Standard of Care13.3
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeCount of participants· 48 weeks

Loss of Independent Ambulation

GroupValue (Participants)
Exenatide2
Standard of Care2
Secondary outcomeMean· 48 weeks

Multiple System Atrophy Quality of Life (MSA-QoL) Scale

GroupValue (score on a scale)Spread
Exenatide53.119.8
Standard of Care53.723.7
Secondary outcomeMean· 48 weeks

Number of Falls

GroupValue (Number of falls)Spread
Exenatide1.72.9
Standard of Care3.06.8
Secondary outcomeCount of participants· 48 weeks

Milestones on UMSARS Part 1 (Speech, Swallow and Falling)

GroupValue (Participants)
Exenatide3
Standard of Care7
Secondary outcomeMean· 48 weeks

Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Scale

GroupValue (score on a scale)Spread
Exenatide3.11.0
Standard of Care2.40.8
Secondary outcomeMean· 48 weeks

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)

GroupValue (score on a scale)Spread
Exenatide26.02.7
Standard of Care27.22.5
Secondary outcomeMean· Score at 48 Weeks

UMSARS Part IV

GroupValue (Score on a scale)Spread
Exenatide2.81.1
Standard of Care3.00.9

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
ExenatideParticipants randomised to receive exenatide.2 / 2510 / 256 / 25
Standard of CareParticipants randomised to receive standard care only.2 / 2510 / 251 / 25

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies12

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

9 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2018

5 results

What Effects Might Exenatide have on Non-Motor Symptoms in Parkinson's Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis.

Athauda et al. 2018Journal of Parkinson's diseasecited by 68

PMID 29843254DOI 10.3233/jpd-181329PUB-29843254

Full text at the publisher5 results

PubMed tag: none · 2017

2 results

Insulin resistance and exendin-4 treatment for multiple system atrophy.

Bassil et al. 2017Brain : a journal of neurologycited by 87

PMID 28334990PMC6248513DOI 10.1093/brain/awx044PUB-28334990

Rights unknown2 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017

4 results

Exenatide once weekly versus placebo in Parkinson's disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Athauda et al. 2017Lancet (London, England)cited by 719

PMID 28781108PMC5831666DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31585-4PUB-28781108

Rights unknown4 results

Indexing hint: Observational study · 2016

Review of head-to-head comparisons of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists.

Madsbad et al. 2016Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 231

PMID 26511102PMC5064617DOI 10.1111/dom.12596PUB-26511102

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND
Read at source

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2014

2 results

Motor and cognitive advantages persist 12 months after exenatide exposure in Parkinson's disease.

Aviles-Olmos et al. 2014Journal of Parkinson's diseasecited by 231

PMID 24662192DOI 10.3233/jpd-140364PUB-24662192

Rights unknown2 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013

5 results

Exenatide and the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease.

Aviles-Olmos et al. 2013The Journal of clinical investigationcited by 440

PMID 23728174PMC3668846DOI 10.1172/jci68295PUB-23728174

Rights unknown5 results

PubMed tag: none · 2012

15 results

Clinical relevance of anti-exenatide antibodies: safety, efficacy and cross-reactivity with long-term treatment.

Fineman et al. 2012Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 117

PMID 22236356DOI 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01561.xPUB-22236356

Full text at the publisher15 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2011

7 results

DURATION-5: exenatide once weekly resulted in greater improvements in glycemic control compared with exenatide twice daily in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Blevins et al. 2011The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismcited by 340

PMID 21307137DOI 10.1210/jc.2010-2081PUB-21307137

Full text at the publisher7 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2010

7 results

Efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly versus sitagliptin or pioglitazone as an adjunct to metformin for treatment of type 2 diabetes (DURATION-2): a randomised trial.

Bergenstal et al. 2010Lancet (London, England)cited by 457

PMID 20580422DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60590-9PUB-20580422

Full text at the publisher7 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2008

2 results

Exenatide once weekly versus twice daily for the treatment of type 2 diabetes: a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority study.

Drucker et al. 2008Lancet (London, England)cited by 809

PMID 18782641DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61206-4PUB-18782641

Full text at the publisher2 results

More studies

2 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2019

Corrected

Utility of Neuronal-Derived Exosomes to Examine Molecular Mechanisms That Affect Motor Function in Patients With Parkinson Disease: A Secondary Analysis of the Exenatide-PD Trial.

Athauda et al. 2019JAMA neurologycited by 210

PMID 30640362PMC6459135DOI 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.4304PUB-30640362

Rights unknown

Indexing hint: Review · 2015

Potential side effects to GLP-1 agonists: understanding their safety and tolerability.

Consoli et al. 2015Expert opinion on drug safetycited by 43

PMID 25496749DOI 10.1517/14740338.2015.987122PUB-25496749

Full text at the publisher
Publisher page

Other registry references

References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.

  • DerivedGirges C, Vijiaratnam N, King A, Auld G, McComish R, Chowdhury K, Ambler G, Maclagan K, Limousin P, Athauda D, Morris HR, Libri V, Foltynie T; Exenatide PD3 and MSA Trials Consortia. Mild-to-moderate depressive symptoms impact on self-reported outcome measures in clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases. Clin Trials. 2026 Feb;23(1):54-64. doi: 10.1177/17407745251387571. Epub 2025 Nov 30. PMID 41321006

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 30 Years up to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Participants aged 30-80 years old with a diagnosis of Possible or Probable MSA of the parkinsonian subtype (MSA-P) or cerebellar subtype (MSA-C) according to The Gilman Criteria (Gilman et al. 2008). * Participants who are less than five years from the time of documented MSA diagnosis or from the time of documented parkinsonian / ataxic neurological condition that later turns out to be MSA. * Participants who are able to walk at least 10 metres with or without assistance. Participants with an anticipated survival of at least three years in the opinion of the investigator. * Participants that are willing to adhere to the study drug regimen. * Participants that are willing and able to perform all protocol-specified assessments and comply with the study visit schedule. * Females of childbearing potential and male participants with partners of childbearing potential must agree to use an effective method of contraception from the time consent is signed until 10 weeks after treatment discontinuation. Females of childbearing potential have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to being randomised. * Willing and able to provide written informed consent. * Subjects who are not able to write may give verbal consent in the presence of at least one witness, and the witness should sign the informed consent form. Exclusion Criteria: * Females who are pregnant, planning pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Women of child-bearing potential who do not practice an acceptable method of birth control. Subjects who meet any of the following criteria which tend to suggest advance disease: 1. Speech impairment as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 1 2. Swallowing impairment as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 2 3. Impairment in ambulation as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 7 4. Falling more frequently than once per week as assessed by a score of ≥ 3 on UMSARS question 8. Participants with a clinically significant or unstable medical or surgical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator might preclude safe completion of the study. * Participants with active malignant neoplasms or history of malignant neoplasm in the last 5 years. Participants with movement disorders other than MSA. * Concurrent dementia defined by a score lower than 21 on the MoCA. * Concurrent severe depression defined by a score of ≥30 on the Beck Depression Inventory-II. * History of deep brain stimulation surgery. * Participants who have taken any investigational products within 90 days prior to baseline. * Participants with a BMI \< 18.5. * Participants with diabetes, end stage renal disease or severely impaired renal function. * History of clinically significant cardiac disease, pancreatitis and/or alcoholism. * Participants with severe gastrointestinal disease including gastroparesis. * Ongoing treatment with sulphonylurea. * Known allergies to the IMP and excipients of IMP.

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.