Change in HbA1c
| Group | Value (Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -1.5 | 1.1 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -1.8 | 0.9 |
| Sitagliptin | -1.0 | 0.9 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name SUSTAIN
Brazil, China, Hong Kong, South Africa, South Korea, Taiwan, Ukraine
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe and South America. The aim of the trial is to compare the effect of once-weekly dosing of two dose levels of semaglutide versus sitagliptin 100 mg once-daily on glycaemic control after 30 weeks of treatment. Subjects will remain on their stable pre-trial metformin.
Experimental
Semaglutide 0.5 mg OW + sitagliptin placebo OD
Experimental
Semaglutide 1 mg OW + sitagliptin placebo OD
Active comparator
Sitagliptin OD + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg OW
Active comparator
Sitagliptin OD + semaglutide placebo 1 mg OW
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change in HbA1c
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period and 'in trial' observation period. 'On-treatment without rescue medication' observation period: started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first. 'In-trial' observation period: started when a participant was randomised until the final scheduled visit, including any period after initiation of rescue medication or premature treatment discontinuation.
Change in Body Weight
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in body weight was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in FPG was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) - Mean 7-point Profile
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in SMPG mean 7-point profile was evaluated. SMPG was recorded at the following 7 time points: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point profile was defined as the area under the profile, calculated using the trapezoidal method, divided by the measurement time. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Self-measured Plasma Glucose (SMPG) - Mean Postprandial Increment Over All Meals
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change from baseline (week 0) to week 30 in SMPG mean postprandial increment over all meals was evaluated. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting Insulin - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting insulin from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting insulin was measured in picomoles per liter (pmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting C-peptide - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting C-peptide from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. C-peptide was measured in nanomoles per liter (nmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting Glucagon - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting glucagon from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting glucagon was measured in picogram per mililiter (pg/mL). Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting Proinsulin - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting proinsulin from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting proinsulin was measured in picomole per liter (pmol/L). Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting proinsulin/insulin ratio from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting HOMA-B (Beta-cell Function) - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting HOMA-B (homeostasis model assessment beta-cell function) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting HOMA-IR (Insulin Resistence) - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting HOMA-IR (homeostasis model assessment insulin resistence) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: SF-36v2™ Score
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Short Form (SF)-36 is a 36-item patient-reported survey that measures patient's overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL). SF-36v2™ (acute version) questionnaire measured 8 domains of functional health \& well-being and 2 component summary scores (physical component summary-PCS and mental component summary-MCS). The 0-100 scale scores (where higher scores indicated a better HRQoL) from the SF-36 were converted to norm-based scores to enable a direct interpretation in relation to the distribution of the scores in the 2009 U.S. general population. In the metric of norm-based scores, 50 and 10 corresponds to the mean and standard deviation respectively of the 2009 U.S. general population. Change from baseline (week 0) in the domain scores and component summary (PCS and MCS) scores were evaluated at weeks 30. A positive change score indicates an improvement since baseline. Results are based on the data from the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in Patient Reported Outcome Questionnaire: DTSQs Score
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change from baseline (week 0) in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) was evaluated at week 30. The DTSQs items are scored on a 7-point graded response scale ranging from 6 to 0. Higher scores indicate higher levels of treatment satisfaction for DTSQs items 3 -8. For items 1 and 2 a higher score indicates a higher patient perceived experience of high blood sugars and low blood sugars, respectively. Thus, lower scores indicate a perception of blood glucose levels being "none of the time" unacceptably high (item 1) or low (item 2). The domain score of total treatment satisfaction (total treatment satisfaction score) was computed by adding the six items scores 3-8. The score ranges 0-36. A higher treatment satisfaction score indicates a higher level of treatment satisfaction. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period.
Change in High-sensitivity CRP - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. High-sensitivity CRP was measured in mg/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Waist Circumference
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in waist circumference from baseline (week 0) to week 30 was measured. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in BMI
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in body mass index (BMI) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 was measured. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting Total Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting total cholesterol from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting total cholesterol was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting LDL Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting low density lipoprotein (LDL) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting LDL was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting VLDL Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting VLDL was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Change in Fasting HDL Cholesterol - Ratio to Baseline
Time frame · Week 0, week 30
Change in fasting high density lipoprotein (HDL) from baseline (week 0) to week 30 is presented as ratio to baseline. Fasting HDL was measured in mmol/L. Results are based on the 'on-treatment without rescue medication' observation period, which started at the date of first dose to either the day of last dose plus 7 days or first initiation of rescue medication, whichever came first.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Percentage of glycosylated haemoglobin) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -1.5 | 1.1 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -1.8 | 0.9 |
| Sitagliptin | -1.0 | 0.9 |
| Group | Value (Kilogram (kg)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -3.0 | 3.8 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -4.2 | 3.7 |
| Sitagliptin | -0.4 | 2.5 |
| Group | Value (Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -2.18 | 2.5 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -2.62 | 2.13 |
| Sitagliptin | -1.0 | 1.74 |
| Group | Value (Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -2.5 | 2.4 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -3.3 | 2.2 |
| Sitagliptin | -1.6 | 2.0 |
| Group | Value (Millimoles per liter (mmol/L)) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | -1.0 | 2.2 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | -1.2 | 2.1 |
| Sitagliptin | -0.7 | 2.2 |
| Group | Value (Ratio of fasting insulin) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | 1.06 | 46.6 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | 1.03 | 51.2 |
| Sitagliptin | 1.01 | 41.6 |
| Group | Value (Ratio of fasting C-peptide) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | 1.08 | 30.3 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | 1.05 | 32.4 |
| Sitagliptin | 1.0 | 32.2 |
| Group | Value (Ratio of fasting glucagon) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mg | 0.89 | 32.4 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mg | 0.89 | 28.1 |
| Sitagliptin | 0.93 | 25.0 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semaglutide 0.5 mgParticipants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial. | 1 / 287 | 18 / 287 | 135 / 287 |
| Semaglutide 1.0 mgParticipants took subcutaneous (s.c., under the skin) injection of semaglutide, once weekly for 30 weeks: 0.25 mg for 0-4 weeks followed by 0.5 mg for 5-8 weeks and then 1.0 mg for 9-30 weeks. Participants also took sitagliptin placebo (0 mg) tablet orally, once daily for 30 weeks. Both semaglutide and sitagliptin placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial. | 1 / 290 | 19 / 290 | 139 / 290 |
| SitagliptinParticipants were randomised to 2 different groups (Group 1: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 0.5 mg and Group 2: sitagliptin + semaglutide placebo 1.0 mg). Both groups were pooled together for data analysis. Participants took 100 mg sitagliptin tablets once-daily for 30 weeks. Participants also took semaglutide placebo injection with volume matched to different doses (0.25 mg/0.5 mg/1.0 mg) of semaglutide injection for 30 weeks. Both sitagliptin and semaglutide placebo were taken any time of the day irrespective of meals. Participants continued taking their pre-trial metformin with the same dose and frequency throughout the trial. | 0 / 290 | 12 / 290 | 89 / 290 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2021
Ji et al. 2021Diabetes, obesity & metabolismcited by 92
PMID 33074557PMC7839591DOI 10.1111/dom.14232PUB-33074557
1 study on this page
PubMed tag: none · 2024
Lee et al. 2024Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorderscited by 7
PMID 38236431PMC10838861DOI 10.1007/s13300-023-01515-0PUB-38236431
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated