Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry data

Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Three Dose Levels of Subcutaneous Semaglutide Once Daily Versus Placebo in Subjects With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis.

NCTNCT02970942 (opens ClinicalTrials.gov in a new tab)Other idNN9931-4296Other id2016-000685-39Other idU1111-1179-7464Other id2016

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Enrollment
320 participants (actual)
Sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S · Industry
Design
Randomized · Double masking
Countries
17 countries

United States, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Greece, Japan, Netherlands, Puerto Rico, Russia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom

Start
30 Nov 2016
Primary completion
13 Feb 2020
Completion
19 Mar 2020
First posted
22 Nov 2016 (estimated)
Last update posted
16 Nov 2021
Conditions
Hepatobiliary Disorders · Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201620172018201920202021
  1. Ph 2

    Investigation of Efficacy and Safety of Three Dose Levels of Subcutaneous Semaglutide Once Daily Versus Placebo in Subjects With Non-alcoholic Steatohepatitis.

    NCT02970942

    30 Nov 2016 to 19 Mar 2020

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

Investigation of efficacy and safety of three dose levels of subcutaneous semaglutide once daily versus placebo in subjects with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

Interventions

  • SemaglutideDrug
  • PlaceboDrug

Arms6

  • Experimental

    Semaglutide 0,1 mg

  • Experimental

    Semaglutide 0,2 mg

  • Experimental

    Semaglutide 0,4 mg

  • Placebo comparator

    Placebo 1

  • Placebo comparator

    Placebo 2

  • Placebo comparator

    Placebo 3

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Non- Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Resolution Without Worsening of Fibrosis After 72 Weeks (Yes/No)

    Time frame · After 72 weeks

    Registry description

    NASH resolution defined by NASH clinical research network as lobular inflammation of 0 or 1 and hepatocellular ballooning reduced to 0; both criteria were necessary conditions. Hepatocellular ballooning ranges from 0-2; lobular inflammation ranges from 0-3, with higher scores indicating more severe hepatocellular ballooning or lobular inflammation. Worsening of fibrosis defined by an increase in fibrosis at least one stage of Kleiner fibrosis classification: fibrosis stages range from 0-4, with higher scores indicating greater fibrosis (0=None, 4=Cirrhosis). Endpoint was evaluated based on data from in-trial period which started on date of randomisation visit and ended on first of following dates (both inclusive):1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

Secondary outcomes(20)
  1. Percentage of Participants With at Least One Stage of Liver Fibrosis Improvement With no Worsening of NASH After 72 Weeks (Yes/No)

    Time frame · After 72 weeks

    Registry description

    NASH resolution defined by NASH clinical research network as lobular inflammation of 0 or 1; hepatocellular ballooning reduced to 0; both criteria were necessary conditions. Hepatocellular ballooning range: 0-2; lobular inflammation range: 0-3, with higher scores indicating more severe hepatocellular ballooning or lobular inflammation. Worsening of fibrosis defined by an increase in fibrosis at least one stage of Kleiner fibrosis classification: fibrosis stages range from 0-4, higher scores indicate greater fibrosis (0=None, 4=Cirrhosis). Endpoint was evaluated based on data from in-trial period which started on date of randomisation visit and ended on first of following dates (both inclusive):1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3)last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4)death.

  2. Percentage of Participants With Change in Total NAFLD (Non- Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) Activity Score (NAS)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Percentage of participants who had worsened, improved or had no change in total NAS from baseline to week 72 is presented. Worsening is defined as an increase of at least 1 in the NAS; Improvement is defined as a decrease of at least 1 in the NAS; while no change corresponds to no change in NAS from baseline to week 72. NAS is calculated as the sum of scores for steatosis (0 to 3), lobular inflammation (0 to 3), and hepatocyte ballooning (0 to 2). Therefore, it is assessed on a scale of 0-8, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  3. Percentage of Participants With Change in Steatosis

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Percentage of participants who had improved, worsened, or had no change in steatosis from baseline to week 72 is presented. Steatosis was assessed on a scale of 0-3, with higher scores indicating more severe steatosis. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  4. Percentage of Participants With Change in Lobular Inflammation

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Percentage of participants who had improved, worsened, or had no change in lobular inflammation from baseline to week 72 is presented. Lobular inflammation was assessed on a scale of 0-3, with higher scores indicating more severe lobular inflammation. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  5. Percentage of Participants With Change in Hepatocyte Ballooning

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Percentage of participants who had improved, worsened, or had no change in hepatocyte ballooning from baseline to week 72 is presented. Hepatocyte ballooning was assessed on a scale of 0-2, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Change in Fibrosis Stage According to the Kleiner Fibrosis Classification

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Percentage of participants who had improved, worsened, or had no change in fibrosis stage from baseline to week 72 is presented. The degree of fibrosis is described by the Kleiner fibrosis staging system, ranging from F0 (absence of fibrosis), F1 (portal/perisinusoidal fibrosis), F2 (perisinusoidal and portal/periportal fibrosis), F3 (septal or bridging fibrosis) through F4 (cirrhosis). The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  7. Percentage of Participants With Change in Activity Component of Steatosis-activity-fibrosis (SAF) Score

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Percentage of participants who had improved, worsened, or had no change in the activity component of the SAF score from baseline to week 72 is presented. SAF score was assessed on a scale of 0-4, with higher scores indicating more severe disease. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  8. Change in Fibrosis-4 Score

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in fibrosis-4 score is presented as ratio to baseline. Fibrosis-4 is the ratio of age in years and aminotransferase to platelet count. It is a non-invasive hepatic fibrosis index score combining standard biochemical values, platelets, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), AST and age that is calculated using formula: Fibrosis-4 = (Age \[years\] x AST \[U/L\]) / (platelets \[10\^9/L\] x (square root of ALT \[U/L\])). A Fibrosis-4 index of \< 1.45 indicated no or moderate fibrosis and an index of \> 3.25 indicated extensive fibrosis/cirrhosis. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  9. Change in NAFLD Fibrosis Score (NFS)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in NFS from baseline to week 72 is presented. NFS is calculated using formula: NFS = -1.675 + 0.037 \* age (years) + 0.094 \* body mass index (BMI) (kg/m\^2) + 1.13 \* hyperglycaemia (yes/no) + 0.99 \* Aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/ Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio + 0.013 × platelet count (\*10\^9/L) - 0.66 \* albumin (g/dL). The score is used to classify the probability of fibrosis. A score a) \< -1.5 indicates a low probability, b) \> -1.5 to \< 0.67 indicates intermediate probability, and a score of c) \> 0.67 indicates a high probability of liver fibrosis. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  10. Change in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in ALT (measured as units per liter) is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  11. Change in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in AST (measured as units per liter) is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  12. Change in Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in GGT (measured as units per liter) is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  13. Change in Albumin

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in albumin (measured as grams per deciliter) is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  14. Change in International Normalized Ratio (INR)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in INR is presented as ratio to baseline. INR is the ratio of measured prothrombin time over normal prothrombin time and it evaluates the extrinsic coagulation pathway (vitamin K dependent clotting factors II; V, VII, IX and X). These clotting factors are synthesised in the liver, thus INR is used as a marker of liver synthesis function. The therapeutic INR range varies, most commonly an INR 2-3 goal, but ranging from 1.5-4.0. Bleeding complications are more likely to occur above an INR value of 4.0. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  15. Change in Enhanced Liver Fibrosis (ELF)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in ELF from baseline to week 72 is presented. The ELF discriminant score was derived as a log-linear combination of the markers hyaluronic acid (HA), amino-terminal propeptide of type III collagen (PIIINP) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 1 (TIMP1). ELF score = -7.412 + 0.681 × ln(HA (nanograms per millilitre (ng/mL)) + 0.775 × ln(P3NP (ng/mL)) + 0.494 × ln(TIMP1 (ng/mL)). ELF score: a) \< 7.7: no to mild fibrosis; b) ≥ 7.7 - \< 9.8: Moderate fibrosis; c) ≥ 9.8 - \< 11.3: Severe fibrosis; d) ≥ 11.3: Cirrhosis. A negative change from baseline indicates decreased fibrosis. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  16. Change in Cytokeratin 18 (CK-18) Fragments

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in CK-18 fragments (M30, M65) (measured as units per liter) is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  17. Change in microRNA 122 (miR-122)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in miR-122 (measured as 1/microliter) is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  18. Change in Interleukin-1 Receptor (IL-1R) Antagonist

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in interleukin-1 receptor (IL-1R) antagonist (measured as picograms per milliliter) antagonist is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  19. Change in Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 (MCP-1)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in MCP-1 (measured as picograms per milliliter) is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

  20. Change in Fibroblast Growth Factor 21 (FGF-21)

    Time frame · Baseline (week 0), Week 72

    Registry description

    Change in FGF-21 (measured as picograms per milliliter) is presented as ratio to baseline. The endpoint was evaluated based on the data from in-trial period which started on the date of the randomisation visit and ended on the first of the following dates (both inclusive): 1) follow-up visit (Week 79); 2) withdrawal of consent; 3) last contact with participant (for participants lost to follow-up); 4) death.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeNumber· After 72 weeks

Percentage of Participants With Non- Alcoholic Steatohepatitis (NASH) Resolution Without Worsening of Fibrosis After 72 Weeks (Yes/No)

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg40.4
Semaglutide 0.2 mg35.6
Semaglutide 0.4 mg58.9
Placebo17.2
Secondary and other outcome results(7)
Secondary outcomeNumber· After 72 weeks

Percentage of Participants With at Least One Stage of Liver Fibrosis Improvement With no Worsening of NASH After 72 Weeks (Yes/No)

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg49.1
Semaglutide 0.2 mg32.2
Semaglutide 0.4 mg42.9
Placebo32.8
Secondary outcomeNumber· Baseline (week 0), Week 72

Percentage of Participants With Change in Total NAFLD (Non- Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease) Activity Score (NAS)

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg71.3
Semaglutide 0.2 mg79.5
Semaglutide 0.4 mg82.9
Placebo43.8
Secondary outcomeNumber· Baseline (week 0), Week 72

Percentage of Participants With Change in Steatosis

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg52.5
Semaglutide 0.2 mg60.3
Semaglutide 0.4 mg63.4
Placebo26.3
Secondary outcomeNumber· Baseline (week 0), Week 72

Percentage of Participants With Change in Lobular Inflammation

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg41.3
Semaglutide 0.2 mg47.4
Semaglutide 0.4 mg37.8
Placebo26.3
Secondary outcomeNumber· Baseline (week 0), Week 72

Percentage of Participants With Change in Hepatocyte Ballooning

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg61.3
Semaglutide 0.2 mg70.5
Semaglutide 0.4 mg74.4
Placebo38.8
Secondary outcomeNumber· Baseline (week 0), Week 72

Percentage of Participants With Change in Fibrosis Stage According to the Kleiner Fibrosis Classification

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg46.3
Semaglutide 0.2 mg32.1
Semaglutide 0.4 mg42.7
Placebo31.3
Secondary outcomeNumber· Baseline (week 0), Week 72

Percentage of Participants With Change in Activity Component of Steatosis-activity-fibrosis (SAF) Score

GroupValue (Percentage of participants)
Semaglutide 0.1 mg62.5
Semaglutide 0.2 mg71.8
Semaglutide 0.4 mg72.0
Placebo42.5

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Semaglutide 0.1 mgParticipants were to receive once daily subcutaneous (s.c.) injection of semaglutide for 72 weeks. Participants initially received 0.05 milligrams (mg) of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks until the target dose of 0.1 mg was reached: 0.05 mg (week 1 to week 4) and 0.1 mg (week 5 to week 72).0 / 8012 / 8061 / 80
Semaglutide 0.2 mgParticipants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of semaglutide for 72 weeks. Participants initially received 0.05 mg of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks until the target dose of 0.2 mg was reached: 0.05 mg (week 1 to week 4), 0.1 mg (week 5 to week 8) and 0.2 mg (week 9 to week 72).1 / 7815 / 7864 / 78
Semaglutide 0.4 mgParticipants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of semaglutide for 72 weeks. Participants initially received 0.05 mg of semaglutide and the dose was then escalated once in 4 weeks until the target dose of 0.4 mg was reached: 0.05 mg (week 1 to week 4), 0.1 mg (week 5 to week 8), 0.2 mg (week 9 to week 12), 0.3 mg (week 13 to week 16) and 0.4 mg (week 17 to week 72).0 / 8112 / 8163 / 81
PlaceboParticipants were to receive once daily s.c. injection of placebo matched to semaglutide (0.05 mg, 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg, 0.3 mg or 0.4 mg) for 72 weeks.0 / 808 / 8055 / 80

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies7

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

5 studies on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2026

4 results

Exploration of Multiple Non-Invasive Tests for Assessing Response to Treatment in a Semaglutide Phase 2b Trial in Patients with MASH.

Nitze et al. 2026Alimentary pharmacology & therapeuticscited by 8

PMID 40985232PMC12807327DOI 10.1111/apt.70376PUB-40985232

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND4 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2024

4 results

Artificial intelligence scoring of liver biopsies in a phase II trial of semaglutide in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis.

Ratziu et al. 2024Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)cited by 34

PMID 38112484PMC11185915DOI 10.1097/hep.0000000000000723PUB-38112484

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND4 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2023

8 results

Improved health-related quality of life with semaglutide in people with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A randomised trial.

Romero-Gómez et al. 2023Alimentary pharmacology & therapeuticscited by 23

PMID 37328931DOI 10.1111/apt.17598PUB-37328931

Full text at the publisher8 results

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2021

10 results

A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Subcutaneous Semaglutide in Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.

Newsome et al. 2021The New England journal of medicinecited by 1,616

PMID 33185364DOI 10.1056/nejmoa2028395PUB-33185364

Rights unknown10 results

Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2020

2 results

Semaglutide for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: Trial design and comparison of non-invasive biomarkers.

Harrison et al. 2020Contemporary clinical trialscited by 29

PMID 33039693DOI 10.1016/j.cct.2020.106174PUB-33039693

Full text at the publisher2 results

More studies

2 studies on this page

PubMed tag: none · 2025

Proteomic signatures reflect effects of semaglutide treatment for MASH.

Schattenberg et al. 2025JHEP reports : innovation in hepatologycited by 6

PMID 40980163PMC12447996DOI 10.1016/j.jhepr.2025.101521PUB-40980163

CC BY
Download PDF

PubMed tag: none · 2023

FibroScan-aspartate aminotransferase (FAST) score for monitoring histological improvement in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis activity during semaglutide treatment: post-hoc analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial.

Wai-Sun Wong et al. 2023EClinicalMedicinecited by 24

PMID 38058795PMC10696384DOI 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.102310PUB-38058795

Free to read · publisher termsCC BY-NC-ND
Read at source

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 18 Years up to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: - Informed consent obtained before any trial-related activities. Trial-related activities are any procedures that are carried out as part of the trial, including activities to determine suitability for the trial except for protocol described pre-screening activities which require a separate informed consent. - Male or female, aged 18-75 years (both inclusive) (for Japan: male or female aged 20-75 years (both inclusive)) at the time of signing informed consent - Local histological diagnosis of NASH followed by histological confirmation of NASH based on central pathologist evaluation of a liver biopsy obtained up to 21 weeks before screening - Histologic evidence of NASH based on central pathologist evaluation of a liver biopsy obtained up to 21 weeks before screening. - NASH fibrosis stage 1, 2 or 3 according to the NASH CRN fibrosis staging system based on central pathologist evaluation Exclusion Criteria: - Known or suspected abuse of alcohol (above 20 g/day for women or above 30 g/day for men), alcohol dependence\* or narcotics. (\* = assessed by the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT questionnaire)) - Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes according to medical records - HbA1c above 10% at screening - History or presence of pancreatitis (acute or chronic) - Calcitonin equal or above 50 ng/L at screening - Family or personal history of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 or medullary thyroid carcinoma. Family is defined as a first degree relative - Body Mass Index (BMI) ≤ 25.0 kg/sqm at the screening visit (visit 1) - Female who is pregnant, breast-feeding or intends to become pregnant or is of childbearing potential and not using an adequate contraceptive method (adequate contraceptive measures as required by local regulation or practice)

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.