Percentage of Subjects Achieving Complete Healing at Day 29.
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| RGN-259 | 6 |
| Placebo | 1 |
Trial · Interventional
TerminatedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataThis trial was stopped early.
Reason given at the registry: Business decision
Results were posted for this trial.
United States
1 trial · 1 stopped early · 1 with posted results
Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy Study of RGN-259 Ophthalmic Solutions for Neurotrophic Keratopathy : SEER-1
NCT0260042917 Sept 2015 to 9 Mar 2020
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of RGN-259 Ophthalmic Solution compared to placebo for the treatment of NK.
Experimental
RGN-259
It is a preservative-free, sterile eye drop solution containing Tβ4
Placebo comparator
Placebo
It is composed of the same excipients as RGN-259 but does not contain Tβ4.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Complete Healing at Day 29.
Time frame · 29 days after first dosing
Percentage of subjects achieving complete healing of the persistent epithelial defect as determined by corneal fluorescein staining at day 29 after first dosing.
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Complete Healing at 8, 15, 22, 36, 43 Days
Time frame · 8, 15, 22, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Percentage of subjects achieving complete healing of the Persistent Epithelial Defect(PED) determined by corneal fluorescein staining at 8, 15, 22, 36, 43 days after first dosing.
Epithelial Defect Measurement and Classification as Stage 1, 2 or 3 Using Mackie Classification.
Time frame · 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Epithelial Defect Measurement and Classification as stage 1, 2 or 3 using Mackie Classification at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Tear Film Break-up Time at 29, 36, 43 Days
Time frame · 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Tear Film Break-up Time at 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Ocular Discomfort by Questionnaire at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 Days After First Dosing
Time frame · 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Ocular Discomfort by Questionnaire at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 Days After First Dosing at Visits 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 (The scale used to determine the difference in Ocular Discomfort by questionnaire on each visit is from 0(None) to 5(Most). This outcome was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the first dosing points and the lower value are considered to be a better outcome. and the all relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame was 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days.)
Visual Acuity(logMAR) at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 Days
Time frame · 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days after first dosing
Visual acuity(logMAR) at 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days (The Visual acuity was assessed by LogMAR calculation method. In the case of the LogMAR method, Each letter has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the LogMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units. and The lower value are considered to be a better outcome.) The formula used in calculating the score is: LogMAR VA = 0.1 + LogMAR value of the best line read - 0.02 X (number of optotypes read) used to determine the difference in Ocular Discomfort by questionnaire on each visit is the ORA scale: 0 None to 5: Most And as this outcome was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at the first dosing points, The lower value are considered to be a better outcome. and the all relevant time points used in the calculation in the Time Frame was 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43 days.)
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| RGN-259 | 6 |
| Placebo | 1 |
| Group | Value (Participants) |
|---|---|
| RGN-259 | 0 |
| Placebo | 0 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| RGN-259 | 1 |
| Placebo | 2 |
| Group | Value (Seconds) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| RGN-259 | 4.444 | 3.3215 |
| Placebo | 4.018 | 2.8758 |
| Group | Value (score on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| RGN-259 | -1.5 | 0.97 |
| Placebo | -0.6 | 1.19 |
| Group | Value (logMAR) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| RGN-259 | 1.451 | 1.1873 |
| Placebo | 1.090 | 0.9697 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| RGN-259 | 6 |
| Placebo | 5 |
| Group | Value (mm) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| RGN-259 | 11.77 | 17.708 |
| Placebo | 14.38 | 17.336 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| RGN-259It is a preservative-free, sterile eye drop solution containing Tβ4 RGN-259: A preservative-free, sterile eye drop solution containing Tβ4 for direct instillation into affected eye(s), five times a day for 4 weeks. | 0 / 10 | 1 / 10 | 4 / 10 |
| PlaceboIt is composed of the same excipients as RGN-259 but does not contain Tβ4. Placebo: It is composed of the same excipients as RGN-259 but does not contain Tβ4 | 0 / 8 | 0 / 8 | 3 / 8 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated