Aim 1: Stimulated Peak Growth Hormone Level
| Group | Value (ng/ml) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin,Female Participants | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Female Participants | 3.1 | 3.3 |
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin, Male Participants | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Male Participants | 2.0 | 2.3 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 4Results postedRegistry dataUnited States
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This study tests the following hypotheses: Aim 1: Test the hypothesis that acute dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibition with the currently available anti-diabetic drug, sitagliptin, will increase stimulated growth hormone (GH) secretion in healthy lean adults by decreasing the degradation of growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH). Aim 2: Test the hypothesis that decreased degradation of GHRH during acute DPP4 inhibition will result in an increase in endothelium-dependent vasodilation mediated by GH and independent from GLP1 (glucagon like peptide-1) in healthy lean adults. This study promises to provide novel data regarding how this increasingly used class of anti-diabetic drugs affects the pituitary GH axis and could affect blood vessel relaxation. Growth hormone levels are low in the setting of obesity and pre-diabetes. A further study may evaluate the effect of chronic DPP4 inhibitor therapy in a population of patients with obesity and pre-diabetes.
Other
Group A (14 healthy subjects)
In Aim 1: Healthy Lean adults are randomized in a double-blinded cross over fashion to sitagliptin versus placebo. In Aim 2: Healthy Lean adults receive sitagliptin and are randomized in a double-blinded cross over fashion to pre-treatment with either LNMMA (L-N-Monomethyl-arginine) versus placebo.
Other
Group B (14 healthy subjects)
In Aim 1: Healthy Lean adults are randomized in a double-blinded cross over fashion to sitagliptin versus placebo. In Aim 2: Healthy Lean adults receive sitagliptin and are randomized in a double-blinded cross over fashion to pre-treatment with either pegvisomant versus placebo.
Other
Group C (14 healthy subjects)
In Aim 1: Healthy Lean adults are randomized in a double-blinded cross over fashion to sitagliptin versus placebo. In Aim 2: Healthy Lean adults receive sitagliptin and are randomized in a double-blinded cross over fashion to pre-treatment with either Exendin 9-39 versus placebo.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Aim 1: Stimulated Peak Growth Hormone Level
Time frame · Growth Hormone Level at 30 minutes (i.e. at completion of arginine infusion), 45 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 180 minutes
Subjects underwent two study days separated by a washout period. On one study day they will receive sitagliptin and on another placebo, in a randomized double-blind fashion. Growth hormone secretion was stimulated using arginine (30 grams i.v. over 30 minutes) on each study day. Growth hormone levels were assessed during a 3 hour period following arginine stimulation.
Aim 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Forearm Vascular Resistance
Time frame · Percent change from baseline in forearm vascular resistance at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 180 minutes
Forearm blood flow was determined by strain gauge plethysmography. Forearm vascular resistance was then calculated by dividing this into mean arterial pressure. The percent change from baseline was determined at each timepoint.
Aim 1: Percent Change From Baseline in Forearm Blood Flow
Time frame · Percent change from baseline in forearm blood flow at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 180 minutes.
Forearm blood flow was determined by strain gauge plethysmography. The percent change from baseline was determined at each timepoint.
Aim 2: Percent Change From Baseline in Forearm Blood Flow
Time frame · Percent change from baseline in forearm blood flow at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 180 minutes.
Subjects undergo two study days separated by a washout period. On one study day they received sitagliptin plus another study drug and on another sitagliptin plus placebo, in a randomized double-blind fashion. Forearm blood flow was assessed at each visit.
Aim 2: Percent Change From Baseline in Forearm Vascular Resistance
Time frame · Percent change from baseline in forearm vascular resistance at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, 120 minutes, 150 minutes, 180 minutes
Subjects undergo two study days separated by a washout period. On one study day they will receive sitagliptin plus another study drug and on another sitagliptin plus placebo, in a randomized double-blind fashion. Forearm blood flow was assessed at each visit every 30 minutes for 3 hours. This was divided into mean arterial pressure to determine forearm vascular resistance.
Aim 1: Venous Blood Sampling for Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA) Activity Levels
Time frame · baseline and every 30 minutes for 180 minutes
In Aim 1 subjects underwent two study days separated by a washout period. On one study day they received study drug and on another placebo, in a randomized double-blind fashion. Venous blood samples were obtained at each visit.
Aim 2: Venous Blood Sampling for Tissue Plasminogen Activator (TPA) Activity Levels
Time frame · baseline and every 30 minutes until 180 minutes
Subjects undergo two study days separated by a washout period. On one study day they received sitagliptin plus pegvisomant and on another sitagliptin plus placebo, in a randomized double-blind fashion. Tissue plasminogen activator activity (tPA) was assessed at each visit.
Aim 2: Measurement of Growth Hormone (GH) Levels
Time frame · baseline and every 30 minutes until 180 minutes
Subjects undergo two study days separated by a washout period. On one study day they received sitagliptin plus pegvisomant and on another sitagliptin plus placebo, in a randomized double-blind fashion. Growth hormone secretion following arginine stimulation was assessed at each visit. Growth hormone levels were determined using an assay that is not subject to interference by pegvisomant.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (ng/ml) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin,Female Participants | 5.2 | 4.2 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Female Participants | 3.1 | 3.3 |
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin, Male Participants | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Male Participants | 2.0 | 2.3 |
| Group | Value (percentage change from baseline) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin,Female Participants | -5.0677 | 18.56794 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Female Participants | -5.3498 | 19.60881 |
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin, Male Participants | 1.4929 | 21.57596 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Male Participants | -11.2235 | 13.60628 |
| Group | Value (percent change from baseline) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin,Female Participants | 0.4835 | 19.44436 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Female Participants | 1.6458 | 19.42502 |
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin, Male Participants | -.0238 | 23.86278 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Male Participants | 9.2597 | 14.60368 |
| Group | Value (percent change from baseline) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and LNMMA, Female Participants | -0.71 | 6.75 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Females in LNMMA Group | -9.34 | 8.60 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and LNMMA, Male Participants | 5.17 | 4.27 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Males in LNMMA Group | 14.78 | 14.78 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Pegvisomant, Female Participants | 15.64 | 5.06 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin & Placebo, Females in Pegvisomant Group | 0.39 | 8.93 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Exendin 9-39, Female Participants | -7.33 | 8.66 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Females in Exendin 9-39 Group | -0.98 | 12.08 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Exendin 9-39, Male Participant | -7.59 | NA |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Male in Exendin 9-39 Group | -22.67 | NA |
| Group | Value (percent change from baseline) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and LNMMA, Female Participants | -8.67 | 9.66 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Females in LNMMA Group | 8.98 | 12.07 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and LNMMA, Male Participants | -9.87 | 0.82 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Males in LNMMA Group | -14.60 | 12.22 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Pegvisomant, Female Participants | -20.00 | 3.67 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin & Placebo,Females in Pegvisomant Group | -3.75 | 12.43 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Exendin 9-39, Female Participants | 5.30 | 8.19 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Females in Exendin 9-39 Group | 4.53 | 12.62 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Exendin 9-39, Male Participant | 0.57 | NA |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Male in Exendin 9-39 Group | 27.77 | NA |
| Group | Value (IU/ml) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin,Female Participants | 0.30 | 0.05 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Female Participants | 0.28 | 0.05 |
| Aim 1: Sitagliptin, Male Participants | 0.44 | 0.14 |
| Aim 1: Placebo, Male Participants | 0.22 | 0.07 |
| Group | Value (IU/ml) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Females in Pegvisomant Group | 0.24 | 0.05 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Pegvisomant, Female Participants | 0.10 | 0.03 |
| Group | Value (ng/mL) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Placebo, Females in Pegvisomant Group | 2.99 | 1.60 |
| Aim 2: Sitagliptin and Pegvisomant, Female Participants | 4.27 | 2.19 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| SitagliptinHealthy lean adults completed a double blinded cross over study in which they took sitagliptin vs. placebo separated by a wash-out. | 0 / 40 | 0 / 40 | 7 / 40 |
| PlaceboHealthy lean adults completed a double blinded cross over study in which they took sitagliptin vs. placebo separated by a wash-out. | 0 / 43 | 0 / 43 | 1 / 43 |
| Sitagliptin Plus PegvisomantFive women from Aim 1 returned for an additional two study days in which they were randomized to sitagliptin plus placebo vs. sitagliptin plus pre-treatment with pegvisomant. | 0 / 5 | 0 / 5 | 2 / 5 |
| Sitagliptin Plus LNMMA9 participants from Aim 1 returned for an additional two study days in which they were randomized to sitagliptin plus placebo vs. sitagliptin plus L-N-mono-methylarginine (LNMMA). | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 | 0 / 9 |
| Sitagliptin Plus Exendin 9-398 participants from Aim 1 returned for an additional two study days in which they were randomized to sitagliptin plus placebo vs. sitagliptin plus Exendin 9-39. | 0 / 8 | 0 / 8 | 0 / 8 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated