Total-group Response Rate at Month 3
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR - All Participants | 18.2 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry dataJapan
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Efficacy and Safety of Pasireotide LAR (Long-acting Release) in Japanese Patients With Acromegaly or Pituitary Gigantism
NCT0167364616 Oct 2012 to 10 Apr 2017
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
To evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pasireotide LAR in Japanese patients with active acromegaly or pituitary gigantism. Primary objective was to assess the total-group efficacy of pasireotide LAR on the reduction of mean GH levels to \< 2.5 µg/L and the normalization of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) at 3 months of study treatment.
Experimental
Pasireotide LAR 20mg
Enrolled patients were randomized to 20mg pasireotide LAR.
Experimental
Pasireotide LAR 40mg
Enrolled patients were randomized to 40mg pasireotide LAR.
Experimental
Pasireotide LAR 60mg
Enrolled patients were randomized to 60mg pasireotide LAR.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Total-group Response Rate at Month 3
Time frame · Month 3
Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean growth hormone (GH) levels to \< 2.5 µg/L and the normalization of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) to within normal limits (age and sex related) at 3 months across all doses
Response Rate at Month 3 by Randomized Dose Level
Time frame · Month 3
Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to \< 2.5 µg/L and the normalization of IGF-1 to within normal limits (age and sex related) at 3 months in each starting dose.
GH Response at Month 3 by Randomized Dose
Time frame · Month 3
Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to \< 2.5 µg/L at 3 months.
IGF-1 Response at Month 3 by Randomized Dose
Time frame · Month 3
Percentage of participants with the normalization of IGF-1 to within normal limits (age and sex related) at 3 months.
Total-group Response Rate (GH & IGF-1) Over Time (Core Phase)
Time frame · Months 3, 6, 9 & 12
Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to \< 2.5 µg/L and the normalization of IGF-1 to within normal limits (age and sex related) at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Percentage of Overall Participants With the Reduction of GH Levels to <2.5 ug/L by Visit (Core Phase)
Time frame · Months 3, 6, 9, 12
This refers to the percentage of participants with a reduction of growth hormone (GH) response rates to \<2.5 ug/L over time.
Percentage of Overall Participants With the Normalization of IGF-1 by Visit (Core Phase)
Time frame · Months 3, 6, 9, 12
This refers to the percentage of participants with the normalization of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) to within normal limits by visit.
Summary of Pasireotide LAR PK Parameters of Ctrough & Cmax by Randomized Dose Level
Time frame · Ctrough: Day 28 after each injection 1-3, Cmax: 3 months after injections 1 and 3
Ctrough: The trough level concentration on day 28, 3 months post 1st, 2nd and 3rd injections of Pasireotide LAR. Cmax: The maximum concentration 3 months post the 1st injection and 3rd injection of LAR.
Summary of Pasireotide LAR PK Parameter of Accumulation Ratio Randomized Dose Level
Time frame · Day 28 after injections 1 and 3
The accumulation ratio was calculated as a ratio of (Ctrough day28, 3rd injection/Ctrough day28, 1st injection).
Change of Tumor Volume From Baseline
Time frame · Baseline, Months 6 , 12
This shows the change in tumor volume from baseline to month 6 and from baseline to month 12 in patients treated with pasireotide LAR.
Change in Mean GH Levels From Baseline
Time frame · Baseline, Months 2.75, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24
This shows the change in mean GH levels from baseline in median GH levels by visit.
Change in Ring Size From Baseline
Time frame · Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Change of clinical signs from baseline: ring size. In Japan, ring sizes are specified using a numerical scale, that only has whole sizes, and does not have simple linear correlation with diameter or circumference. Only numbers are used ranging from 1 to 27. For instance, a ring size of 1 in Japan is equivalent to an inside circumference ring size of 38.86 mm and a ring size of 27 in Japan is equivalent to an inside circumference ring size of 70.15 mm.
Number of Participants With Acromegaly Symptoms or Pituitary Gigantism (Core Phase)
Time frame · 12 Months (Core phase)
Number of participants with a change of clinical signs from baseline (BL): headache (HA), fatigue (FA), perspiration (PE), paresthesias (PA), osteoarthralgia (OS)
Change From Baseline in Prolactin
Time frame · Baseline, Months 3, 6, 9, 12
Change in prolactin levels from baseline
Total-group Response Rate by Visit (Extension Phase)
Time frame · Months 18, 24
Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to \< 2.5 µg/L and the normalization of IGF-1 to within normal limits (age and sex related) a18 and 24 months of study treatment.
Percentage of Overall Participants With the Reduction of Mean GH Levels to <2.5 ug/L by Visit (Extension Phase)
Time frame · Months 18, 24
Percentage of participants with a reduction of mean GH levels to \< 2.5µg/L at 18 and 24 months of study treatment
Percentage of Overall Participants With the Normalization of IGF-1 by Visit (Extension Phase)
Time frame · Months 18, 24
Percentage of participants with the normalization of IGF-1 to within normal limits (age and sex related) at 18 and 24 months of study. treatment
Change From Baseline in Mean GH by Visit and SSA Uncontrolled Status (Extension Phase)
Time frame · Baselnine, Months 2.75, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24
This shows a change of mean GH levels and somatostatin analogues (SSAs) from baseline in extension phase
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR - All Participants | 18.2 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR 20mg | 9.1 |
| Pasireotide LAR 40mg | 36.4 |
| Pasireotide LAR 60mg | 9.1 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR 20mg | 27.3 |
| Pasireotide LAR 40mg | 45.5 |
| Pasireotide LAR 60mg | 18.2 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR 20mg | 18.2 |
| Pasireotide LAR 40mg | 45.5 |
| Pasireotide LAR 60mg | 9.1 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR - All Participants | 18.2 |
| Group | Value (Percenage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR - All Participants | 30.3 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR - All Participants | 24.2 |
| Group | Value (ng/mL) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR 20mg | 5.36 | 3.35 |
| Pasireotide LAR 40mg | 8.41 | 5.26 |
| Pasireotide LAR 60mg | 10.8 | 5.12 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pasireotide LAR 20mgEnrolled patients were randomized to 20mg pasireotide LAR. | 0 / 11 | 3 / 11 | 11 / 11 |
| Pasireotide LAR 40mgEnrolled patients were randomized to 40mg pasireotide LAR. | 0 / 11 | 3 / 11 | 11 / 11 |
| Pasireotide LAR 60mgEnrolled patients were randomized to 60mg pasireotide LAR. | 0 / 11 | 5 / 11 | 11 / 11 |
| Pasireotide LAR - All Participants (All Patieents)Patients who were randomized to the study - regardless of whether they were in the Core or Extension phase. | 0 / 33 | 11 / 33 | 33 / 33 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated