Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry data

Safety and Efficacy Study of Exenatide Once Weekly in Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Enrollment
84 participants (actual)
Sponsor
AstraZeneca · Industry
Design
Randomized · Quadruple masking
Countries
7 countries

United States, Bulgaria, Hungary, Israel, Kuwait, Mexico, Ukraine

Start
2 Dec 2011
Primary completion
6 May 2020
Completion
5 May 2021
First posted
15 Mar 2012 (estimated)
Last update posted
30 Nov 2021
Conditions
Children and Adolescent With Type 2 Diabetes

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
201220142016201820202022
  1. Ph 3

    Safety and Efficacy Study of Exenatide Once Weekly in Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes

    NCT01554618

    2 Dec 2011 to 5 May 2021

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The study examines the Safety and efficacy study of exenatide once weekly in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes

Interventions

  • Exenatide Once WeeklyDrug
  • PlaceboDrug

Arms2

  • Experimental

    EQW

    Exenatide once weekly

  • Placebo comparator

    Placebo

    Placebo once weekly

Primary outcomes3

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in HbA1c (%) to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted least square (LS) mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A mixed model with repeated measures (MMRM) analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or premature discontinuation of study medication.

  2. Percentage of Patients With On-Treatment Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 24, plus up to a maximum of 90 days follow up

    Registry description

    A controlled assessment period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of study medication up to but not including Week 24 for patients entering the extension period. For patients not entering the extension period, the period was defined up to and including last dose of study medication + 7 days (+ 90 days for serious AEs \[SAEs\] and other clinically significant or related AEs). The Investigator assessed AEs for causal relationship to study drug medication.

  3. Percentage of Patients Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Exenatide up to Week 24

    Time frame · Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24

    Registry description

    Percentage of patients positive for ADAs up to Week 24 for the exenatide treatment group is reported. Baseline was the antibody measurement at Week 0 (Day 1). A negative or missing antibody measurement was considered negative at baseline. High positive = antibody titers ≥ 625, including baseline assessment. Low positive = antibody titers \< 625, including baseline assessment. A patient was said to have treatment-emergent ADA positive at a visit if the antibody test was positive after the first dose of exenatide following a negative or missing antibody measurement, or the titer increased by at least 1 titration category from a detectable measurement prior to first dose of randomized study medication.

Secondary outcomes(20)
  1. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Concentration to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in FPG to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.

  2. Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in body weight to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.

  3. Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in fasting insulin to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.

  4. Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · At Week 24

    Registry description

    The percentage of patients achieving HbA1c goals of \< 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and \< 7.0% at Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported. A Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) analysis was performed with missing data treated as non-responder, and excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.

  5. Change From Baseline in Lipid Profiles to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in lipid profiles to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as mean values (Standard International \[SI\] units). The following lipids were assessed: total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and triglycerides. All lipids presented were taken in a fasted state. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  6. Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in SBP and DBP to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.

  7. Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24

    Registry description

    Number of patients needing rescue medication at Week 24 and at each intermediate visit during the controlled assessment period is reported. Patients with a loss of glycemic control, defined as either an increase from baseline in HbA1c values by ≥ 1.0% at 2 consecutive clinic visits that were at least 1 month apart, or a fasting plasma glucose value ≥ 250 mg/dL or random blood glucose value \> 300 mg/dL for 4 days during a 7 day period, received rescue medication. Data collected after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  8. Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessments - Beta-Cell Function (HOMA-B) and Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA-S) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S in patients who were not taking insulin to Week 24 during the controlled assessment period is reported as adjusted LS mean values. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. A MMRM analysis was performed, excluding data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication.

  9. Percentage of Patients Reporting AEs of Injection Site Reactions up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

    Time frame · At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18 and Week 24

    Registry description

    Percentage of patients reporting injection site reactions at Week 24 and at each intermediate visit during the controlled assessment period is reported. Injection site reactions were presented from the AE case report form (CRF), based on the "Injection site reactions" higher level term. A controlled assessment period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of study medication up to but not including Week 24 for patients entering the extension period. For patients not entering the extension period, the period was defined up to and including last dose of study medication + 7 days (+ 90 days for SAEs and other clinically significant or related AEs).

  10. Change From Baseline in HbA1c to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in HbA1c (%) to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  11. Change From Baseline in FPG Concentration to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in FPG to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  12. Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in body weight to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  13. Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in fasting insulin to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  14. Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · At Week 52

    Registry description

    The percentage of patients achieving HbA1c goals of \< 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and \< 7.0% at Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  15. Change From Baseline in Lipids Profiles to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in lipid profiles to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values (SI units). The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. The following lipids were assessed: total cholesterol, HDL-C, LDL-C, and triglycerides. All lipids presented were taken in a fasted state. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  16. Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic) to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in SBP and DBP to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  17. Number of Patients Needing Rescue Medication Due to Failure to Maintain Glycemic Control up to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40 and Week 52

    Registry description

    Number of patients needing rescue medication at Week 52 and at each intermediate visit during the treatment period is reported. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Patients with a loss of glycemic control, defined as either an increase from baseline in HbA1c values by ≥ 1.0% at 2 consecutive clinic visits that were at least 1 month apart, or a fasting plasma glucose value ≥ 250 mg/dL or random blood glucose value \> 300 mg/dL for 4 days during a 7 day period, received rescue medication. Data collected after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  18. Change From Baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · Baseline (Week 0) and Week 52

    Registry description

    Change from baseline in HOMA-B and HOMA-S to Week 52 among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported as mean values. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing assessment (scheduled or unscheduled) on or prior to the first dose of randomized study medication. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication or after premature discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

  19. Percentage of Patients Reporting AEs of Injection Site Reactions up to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · At Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 18, Week 24, Week 28, Week 40 and Week 52

    Registry description

    Percentage of patients reporting injection site reactions at Week 52 and at each intermediate visit among patients who received open-label exenatide during the treatment period is reported. The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Injection site reactions were presented from the AE CRF, based on the "Injection site reactions" higher level term. An Extension Period AE was defined as an AE starting on or after day of first dose of open-label exenatide to last dose + 7 days (+ 90 days for SAEs and other clinically significant or related AEs).

  20. Plasma Exenatide Concentrations to Week 52 Among Patients Who Received Open-Label Exenatide (Treatment Period)

    Time frame · Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12, Week 24 and Week 52

    Registry description

    Geometric mean plasma exenatide concentrations up to Week 52 during the treatment period are reported (for the placebo then exenatide treatment group, only Weeks 24 and 52 were applicable). The treatment period was defined as the controlled assessment period and extension period combined. Data collected after initiation of rescue medication were included. Data collected after discontinuation of study medication were excluded.

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

GroupValue (percentage (% HbA1c))Spread
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-0.360.184
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo0.490.273
Primary outcomeNumber· Day 1 (Week 0) up to Week 24, plus up to a maximum of 90 days follow up

Percentage of Patients With On-Treatment Adverse Events (AEs) up to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide61.0
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo73.9
Primary outcomeNumber· Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 4, Week 8, Week 12 and Week 24

Percentage of Patients Positive for Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADAs) to Exenatide up to Week 24

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Treatment Period - Exenatide17.0
Secondary and other outcome results(5)
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Concentration to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

GroupValue (milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL))Spread
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-5.27.65
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo16.511.32
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Change From Baseline in Body Weight to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

GroupValue (kilogram (kg))Spread
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-0.590.665
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo0.630.982
Secondary outcomeLeast squares mean· Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

GroupValue (picomoles per liter (pmol/L))Spread
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide79.652.28
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo-15.378.49
Secondary outcomeNumber· At Week 24

Percentage of Patients Achieving HbA1c Goals of < 6.5%, ≤ 6.5%, and < 7.0% at Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

GroupValue (percentage of participants)
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide19.0
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo4.2
Secondary outcomeMean· Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Change From Baseline in Lipid Profiles to Week 24 (Controlled Assessment Period)

GroupValue (millimoles per liter (mmol/L))Spread
Controlled Assessment Period - Exenatide-0.1170.7124
Controlled Assessment Period - Placebo-0.1140.5819

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Controlled Assessment Period - ExenatidePatients received exenatide 2 mg SC injection once weekly for 24 weeks during the controlled assessment period.0 / 592 / 5925 / 59
Controlled Assessment Period - PlaceboPatients received placebo (matching with exenatide) SC injection once weekly for 24 weeks during the controlled assessment period.0 / 231 / 2310 / 23
Extension Period - ExenatidePatients received open-label exenatide 2 mg SC injection once weekly for 28 weeks during the extension period. Patients in this treatment group had previously received exenatide during the controlled assessment period.0 / 503 / 5010 / 50
Extension Period - Placebo to ExenatidePatients received open-label exenatide 2 mg SC injection once weekly for 28 weeks during the extension period. Patients in this treatment group had previously received placebo during the controlled assessment period.0 / 221 / 224 / 22

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies1

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

1 study on this page

Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2022

5 results

Once-Weekly Exenatide in Youth With Type 2 Diabetes.

Tamborlane et al. 2022Diabetes carecited by 74

PMID 35679098PMC9346995DOI 10.2337/dc21-2275PUB-35679098

Rights unknown5 results

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 10 Years up to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Each patient must meet the following criteria to be enrolled in this study. 1. Is a child or an adolescent of 10 to \<18 years old, at Visit 1 (Screening) 2. Has been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes mellitus per American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria 3. HbA1c of 6.5% to 11.0%, inclusive, in patients not taking insulin/SU, and of 6.5% to 12.0%, inclusive, in patients taking insulin/SU, at Visit 1 (Screening) 4. Has a C-peptide of \>0.6 ng/L at Visit 1 (Screening) 5. Has been treated with diet and exercise alone or in combination with a stable dose of an oral antidiabetic agent (e.g., metformin and/or SU) and/or insulin for their type 2 diabetes for at least 2 months prior to Visit 1 (Screening) 6. Has a fasting plasma glucose concentration \<280 mg/dL (15.5 mmol/L) at Visit 1 (Screening) Patients who meet any of the following criteria will be excluded from the study. 1. Has a clinically significant medical condition that could potentially affect study participation and/or personal well-being, as judged by the Investigator, including but not limited to the following conditions: 1. Hepatic disease (defined by aspartate or alanine transaminase \>3.0 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) 2. Renal disease or serum creatinine \>1.5 mg/dL (132.6 µmol/L) (males) or 1.4 mg/dL (123.8 µmol/L) (females) 3. Gastrointestinal disease deemed significant by the Investigator 4. Organ transplantation 5. Chronic infection (e.g., tuberculosis, human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus) 6. Clinically significant malignant disease (with the exception of basal and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin) within 5 years of Visit 1 (Screening) 2. Has positive antibody titers to glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) or islet cell antigen (ICA512) at Visit 1 (Screening) 3. Has a personal or family history of elevated calcitonin, calcitonin \>100 ng/L, medullary thyroid carcinoma, or multiple endocrine neoplasia-2 4. Has ever used exenatide (exenatide once weekly \[exenatide LAR\], exenatide BID, BYETTA, or any other formulation) or any glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist (e.g., liraglutide \[Victoza®\]) 5. Is pregnant

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.