Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids Averaged Over a 3-Month Period
| Group | Value (nocturnal voids) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -1 | 0.94 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | -1.21 | 0.957 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataShort name COMFORT
United States, Canada
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial to investigate the safety and efficacy of desmopressin oral melt tablets against placebo during 3 months of treatment in adult females with nocturia.
Experimental
Desmopressin 25 μg
Participants took 1 orally disintegrating tablet of desmopressin 25 μg every night approximately 1 hour before bedtime for the entire duration of the 3-month treatment period.
Placebo comparator
Placebo
Participants took 1 orally disintegrating tablet of placebo every night approximately 1 hour before bedtime for the entire duration of the 3-month treatment period.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids Averaged Over a 3-Month Period
Time frame · Day 1 (Baseline); Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3 (3-month treatment period)
The number of nocturnal voids was the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to Day 1 and prior to the during-treatment visits (Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3) as recorded in participant diaries. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void. Change from baseline values for Week 1, and Months 1, 2 and 3 are reported below. Comparison of the mean number of nocturnal voids at baseline and over a 3-month treatment period (obtained by longitudinal analysis of Week 1, and Months 1, 2 and 3) are reported in the statistical analysis. This was the first co-primary endpoint. The trial was to be declared positive only if the 25 μg desmopressin group had a statistically significant positive effect as compared to placebo on both co-primary endpoints.
Adjusted Probability of Participants Achieving a >33% Reduction From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Voids for All During-Treatment Visits up to Month 3
Time frame · Day 1 (Baseline); Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3 (3-month treatment period)
Probability of participants achieving 33% responder status during 3 months of treatment employed a longitudinal analysis assessing nocturnal void information captured in the 3-day diary. A 33% responder was defined as a participant with a decrease of at least 33% in the mean number of nocturnal voids relative to baseline. The number of nocturnal voids was the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to Day 1 and prior to the during treatment visits (Week 1, Months 1, 2, 3) as recorded in participant diaries. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void. This was the second co-primary endpoint. The trial was to be declared positive only if the 25 μg desmopressin group had a statistically significant positive effect as compared to placebo on both co-primary endpoints.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Nocturnal Voids at Month 3
Time frame · Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
The number of nocturnal voids was the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to Day 1 and prior to the during-treatment visits (Month 3 for this outcome) as recorded in participant diaries. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void. Secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed.
Adjusted Probability of Participants Achieving a >33% Reduction From Baseline in Number of Nocturnal Voids at Month 3
Time frame · Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
Probability of participants achieving 33% responder status at Month 3 employed a longitudinal analysis assessing nocturnal void information captured in the 3-day diary. A 33% responder was defined as a participant with a decrease of at least 33% in the mean number of nocturnal voids relative to baseline. The number of nocturnal voids was the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to Day 1 and prior to the Month 3 visit as recorded in participant diaries. The first morning void was not counted as a nocturnal void. The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed.
Change From Baseline in Mean Time to First Nocturnal Void at Month 3
Time frame · Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
The time to first void was defined as the time from going to bed with the intention of sleeping until first nocturnal void or until waking in the morning in cases where there was no nocturnal void. The time to first void was derived from the sleep and voiding diary. The mean time to first void was calculated as the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to the Month 3 visit. The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed.
Change From Baseline in Nocturnal Urine Volume at Month 3
Time frame · Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
The nocturnal urine volume was derived from the 3-day urine volume diary. The nocturnal urine volume included the volume of the first morning void. Mean urine volumes were calculated as the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to the Month 3 visit. The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed.
Change From Baseline in 24-Hour Urine Volume at Month 3
Time frame · Day 1 (Baseline), Month 3
Twenty-four hour urine volume was derived from the 3-day urine volume diary. Mean urine volumes were calculated as the average over 3 consecutive 24-hour periods prior to the Month 3 visit. The secondary efficacy outcomes (#3-7) used a hierarchical step-down approach in the order listed.
Summary of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame · Day 1 up to 3 months
A TEAE was any adverse event occurring after start of treatment and within the time of residual drug effect, i.e., within 1 day of the last dose of desmopressin. An adverse drug reaction (ADR) was any AE assessed by the Investigator as possibly/probably related to study drug.
Minimum Post-Treatment Serum Sodium Levels
Time frame · Day 1 up to 3 months
Serum sodium levels were monitored since hyponatremia is a potential serious adverse event associated with daily doses of desmopressin. The serum sodium level must have been within the normal reference range at the Screening Visit for the participant to be eligible for enrollment. A participant was to be withdrawn from the trial if the serum sodium level was \<=125 mmol/L at any time.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (nocturnal voids) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -1 | 0.94 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | -1.21 | 0.957 |
| Group | Value (probability) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 0.64 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | 0.76 |
| Group | Value (nocturnal voids) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -1.38 | 1.13 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | -1.69 | 0.978 |
| Group | Value (probability) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 0.69 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | 0.79 |
| Group | Value (minutes) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | 115 | 139 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | 168 | 138 |
| Group | Value (mL) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -151 | 262 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | -242 | 283 |
| Group | Value (mL) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | -152 | 497 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | -255 | 522 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| Placebo | 57 |
| Desmopressin 25 μg | 60 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| PlaceboParticipants took 1 orally disintegrating tablet of placebo every night approximately 1 hour before bedtime for the entire duration of the 3-month treatment period. | – | 2 / 126 | 14 / 126 |
| Desmopressin 25 μgParticipants took 1 orally disintegrating tablet of desmopressin 25 μg every night approximately 1 hour before bedtime for the entire duration of the 3-month treatment period. | – | 0 / 135 | 12 / 135 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013
Sand et al. 2013The Journal of urologycited by 57
PMID 23454404DOI 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.037PUB-23454404
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2017
Juul et al. 2017BJU internationalcited by 33
PMID 27862898DOI 10.1111/bju.13718PUB-27862898
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated