Skip to content

Trial · Interventional

CompletedNot applicableResults postedRegistry data

Continuous Glucose Monitoring Evaluation of Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Insulin Glargine

Overview

Status
Completed
Phase
Not applicable
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Sponsor
HealthPartners Institute · Other
Design
Randomized · Open label (no masking)
Countries
1 country

United States

Start
Apr 2010
Primary completion
May 2013
Completion
May 2013
First posted
18 Mar 2010 (estimated)
Last update posted
23 May 2017
Conditions
Type 2 Diabetes

Timeline

1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results

  • Completed
  • Ongoing
  • Not yet recruiting
  • Stopped
  • Estimated dates (est.)
  • Results posted
20102011201220132014
  1. N/A

    Continuous Glucose Monitoring Evaluation of Exenatide Twice Daily Versus Insulin Glargine

    NCT01089569

    Apr 2010 to May 2013

Registry summary

Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.

The primary purpose of this study is to compare the effect on 24-hour blood glucose patterns, HbA1c, and weight management when adding insulin glargine, or exenatide, or a combination of insulin glargine and exenatide to metformin.

Interventions

  • ExenatideDrug
  • Insulin GlargineDrug

Arms3

  • Active comparator

    Exenatide

    5 mcg BID (twice daily) for 1 month increasing to 10 mcg BID for the remainder of the study

  • Active comparator

    Insulin Glargine

    .1 unit per kg to start, titrated based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring results

  • Active comparator

    Exenatide + Insulin Glargine

    Exenatide: 5 mcg BID (twice daily) for 1 month increasing to 10 mcg BID for the remainder of the study \+ Insulin Glargine: 0.1 unit per kg to start, titrated based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring results

Primary outcomes1

Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.

  1. HbA1c Change

    Time frame · baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

    Registry description

    Measure the changes in HbA1C attributable to exenatide, insulin glargine and their combination. Employ CGM with AGP analysis to determine if there is an incremental benefit for subjects who do not reach target to add exenatide to insulin glargine or insulin glargine to exenatide in patients taking metformin.

Secondary outcomes(6)
  1. Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency)

    Time frame · baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

    Registry description

    Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- iv. Incidence of hypoglycemia (frequency) Change from baseline was calculated as mean incidence rate at baseline minus mean incidence rate at final visit (32 weeks)

  2. Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)

    Time frame · baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

    Registry description

    Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- iv. Incidence of hypoglycemia (degree) Change from baseline was calculated as mean incidence percentage at baseline minus mean incidence percentage at final visit (32 weeks)

  3. Change From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)

    Time frame · baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

    Registry description

    Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves iii. Glucose stability (absolute hourly rate of change in median curve) Change from baseline was calculated as mean absolute hourly rate of change in median curve at baseline minus rate at final visit (32 weeks). Mean absolute hourly rate of change in the smoothed median curve is calculated as delta subscript MC = (\|p subscript 50 zero - p subscript 50 23\|+Sum superscript 23 subscript i = 1\| p subscript 50i - p subscript 50 i-1\| over T. i = hour of day p subscript 50i = smoothed 50th percentile value for ith hour of day T = total # of non-missing hourly smoothed percentiles

  4. Change From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability

    Time frame · baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

    Registry description

    Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- ii. Glucose variability (inter-quartile range) IQR is the difference between the 75th and 25th percentiles. Change from baseline was calculated as IQR at baseline minus IQR value at final visit (32 weeks).

  5. Change From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)

    Time frame · baseline - final visit (32 weeks)

    Registry description

    Employ Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) with Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) analysis to characterize the diurnal patterns produced by oral medications (metformin) used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Employ CGM to measure the effect of exenatide, insulin glargine and exenatide plus insulin glargine in terms of underlying physiological defects and alter medications in a manner that improves- i. Glucose exposure (area under the diurnal median curve) Change from baseline was calculated as area under the diurnal median curve at baseline minus AUC value at final visit (32 weeks). AUC is calculated using modified rectangle method AUC = sum of superscript 23, subscript i=0 P subscript 50i I = hour of day P subscript 50i = smoother 50th percentile value for ith hour of day

  6. Change From Baseline in Weight Changes

    Time frame · baseline - final visit (32 weeks)

    Registry description

    Measure the changes in weight attributable to exenatide, insulin glargine and their combinations. Employ CGM with AGP analysis to determine if there is an incremental benefit for subjects who do not reach target to add exenatide to insulin glargine or insulin glargine to exenatide in patients taking metformin. Change from baseline was calculated as weight in pounds at baseline minus weight in pounds at final visit (32 weeks).

Posted results

Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.

Primary outcome results

Primary outcomeMean· baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

HbA1c Change

GroupValue (%HbA1c)Spread
Exenatide6.40.3
Insulin Glargine6.40.5
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine6.20.5
Secondary and other outcome results(6)
Secondary outcomeMean· baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Frequency)

GroupValue (episodes/day)Spread
Exenatide.70.8
Insulin Glargine.80.8
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine.60.4
Secondary outcomeMean· baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

Change From Baseline in Incidence of Hypoglycemia (Degree)

GroupValue (percentage of measures under 70 mg/dL)Spread
Exenatide1.72.7
Insulin Glargine1.71.8
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine1.31.1
Secondary outcomeMean· baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

Change From Baseline in Glucose Stability (Absolute Hourly Rate of Change in Median Curve)

GroupValue (mg/dL/hr)Spread
Exenatide-22.7
Insulin Glargine-2.94.4
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine-23.5
Secondary outcomeMean· baseline to final visit (32 weeks)

Change From Baseline in CGM Glucose Variability

GroupValue (mg/dL)Spread
Exenatide-99.1
Insulin Glargine-7.719.4
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine-12.114
Secondary outcomeMean· baseline - final visit (32 weeks)

Change From Baseline in Glucose Exposure (Area Under the Diurnal Median Curve or AUC)

GroupValue (mg/dL*24hr)Spread
Exenatide-1207.1661.1
Insulin Glargine-1476.2849.2
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine-1315953.9
Secondary outcomeMean· baseline - final visit (32 weeks)

Change From Baseline in Weight Changes

GroupValue (lbs (pounds))Spread
Exenatide-13.510.2
Insulin Glargine-0.57.7
Exenatide + Insulin Glargine-10.310.5

Adverse events, as posted

Adverse events as posted: participants affected out of participants at risk, by group
GroupDeathsSerious eventsOther events
Exenatide5 mcg BID for 1 month increasing to 10 mcg BID for the remainder of the study Exenatide: refer to Arm detail–0 / 2020 / 20
Insulin Glargine.1 unit per kg to start, titrated based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring results Insulin Glargine: refer to Arm detail–0 / 2010 / 20
Exenatide + Insulin GlargineExenatide: 5 mcg BID (twice daily) for 1 month increasing to 10 mcg BID for the remainder of the study \+ Insulin Glargine: 0.1 unit per kg to start, titrated based on Continuous Glucose Monitoring results–0 / 2013 / 20

Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.

Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works

Studies1

Studies that cite this trial.

Studies with results

1 study on this page

Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2009

7 results

Diurnal glucose patterns of exenatide once weekly: a 1-year study using continuous glucose monitoring with ambulatory glucose profile analysis.

Mazze et al. 2009Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologistscited by 20

PMID 19454385DOI 10.4158/ep09046.orrPUB-19454385

Full text at the publisher7 results

Eligibility

Who could join, as posted.

Sex
All
Age
from 18 Years up to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted
Inclusion and exclusion criteria, as posted
Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female subjects ≥18 and ≤75 years of age * Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes * Diabetes duration ≥ 1 year * HbA1c ≥7.0% * Currently treated with metformin (HbA1c ≤9%) or metformin/sulfonylurea (SU) (HbA1c ≤8%)or SU alone (HbA1c ≤8%) Exclusion Criteria: * Previously treated with insulin or incretin-based therapy * Treated with a thiazolidinedione within past 6 weeks * Taken oral or injected prednisone or cortisone medications in the previous 30 days * Any pancreatic disease or at high risk of pancreatitis (history of alcohol abuse, active gallbladder disease) * Serum creatinine \>1.4mg/dL (women) or \>1.5 mg/dL (men) * eGFR (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate) \<30 ml/min (using MDRD/ Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation) * ALT(Alanine Transaminase) \> 2x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) * Presence of any severe medical or psychological condition or chronic conditions/infections that in the opinion of the Investigator would compromise he subject's safety or successful participation in the study * Currently pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study period * Unable to follow the study protocol * Unable to speak, read and write in English * Uncontrolled hyperglycemia with HbA1c \> 9% on metformin or \>8% on SU or metformin/SU combination or ketonuria requiring immediate insulin therapy * At the investigator's discretion for other medical or psychological reasons

PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.