Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 30
| Group | Value (percent of hemoglobin) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | -1.13 | 0.053 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | -1.10 | 0.051 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataArgentina, Belgium, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Italy, Mexico, Netherlands, Portugal, Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
A Trial Comparing Two Therapies: Basal Insulin/Glargine, Exenatide and Metformin Therapy (BET) or Basal Insulin/Glargine, Bolus Insulin Lispro and Metformin Therapy (BBT) in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
NCT00960661Sept 2009 to Aug 2012
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The study will compare two combination therapies: 1) Combined Basal Insulin Glargine (once a day), Exenatide (twice a day), and Metformin Therapy; or 2) Combined Basal Insulin Glargine (once a day), Bolus Insulin Lispro (three times a day), and Metformin Therapy, in subjects with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus who have inadequate glycemic control.
Experimental
Exenatide (BET)
Basal Insulin/Glargine, Exenatide and Metformin Therapy (BET)
Active comparator
Insulin Lispro (BBT)
Basal Insulin/Glargine, Bolus Insulin Lispro and Metformin Therapy (BBT)
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 30
Time frame · Baseline, 30 weeks
Change in HbA1c from baseline following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e. HbA1c at week 30 minus HbA1c at baseline).
Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1C < 7.0%
Time frame · Week 30
Percentage of participants achieving HbA1C \< 7.0%
Percent of Participants Achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5%.
Time frame · Week 30
Percent of participants achieving HbA1c ≤ 6.5%.
Change in Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG) From Baseline to Week 30.
Time frame · Baseline, Week 30
Change in fasting blood glucose (FBG) from Baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model. The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects.
Change in Total Cholesterol From Baseline to Week 30
Time frame · Baseline, week 30
Change in total cholesterol from baseline to Week 30 using ANCOVA model. The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate.
Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) From Baseline to Week 30
Time frame · Baseline, week 30
Change in High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) from baseline to Week 30 using ANCOVA model.The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate.
Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) From Baseline to Week 30
Time frame · Baseline, Week 30
Change in Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) from baseline to week 30 using ANCOVA model.The model included the respective secondary outcome as dependent variable, country, prior use of SU's and treatment groups as factors, and the respective outcomes baseline value as a covariate.
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 30.
Time frame · baseline, week 30
Change in body weight from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects.
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 30
Time frame · Baseline, Week 30
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects.
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) From Baseline to Week 30
Time frame · baseline, Week 30
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) from baseline to Week 30 using MMRM model.The model included the respective baseline outcome as covariate, treatment, country, prior use of SUs, week of visit, and treatment-by-week interaction as fixed effects and patient and error as random effects.
Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at Baseline and at Week 30
Time frame · Baseline, week 30
Daily Insulin Glargine Dose at baseline and at Week 30
Major Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year
Time frame · 30 weeks
Mean (standard deviation) of major hyperglycemia episodes experienced per year. Rates per year were calculated for each individual as the number of episodes divided by the total number of days in the study (from randomization to last visit date), then multiplied by 365.25. Major hypoglycemia was defined as any symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure that shows prompt recovery in response to administration of glucagon or glucose OR documented hypoglycemia (blood glucose \<3.0 mmol/L \[54 mg/dL\]) and requiring the assistance of another person because of severe impairment in consciousness or behavior.
Minor Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year
Time frame · 30 weeks
Mean (standard deviation) of minor hyperglycemia episodes experienced per year. Rates per year were calculated for each individual as the number of episodes divided by the total number of days in the study (from randomization to last visit date), then multiplied by 365.25. Minor hypoglycemia was defined as any time a participant feels that he or she is experiencing a sign or symptom associated with hypoglycemia that is either self-treated by the participant or resolves on its own AND has a concurrent finger stick blood glucose \<3.0 mmol/L (54 mg/dL)
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percent of hemoglobin) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | -1.13 | 0.053 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | -1.10 | 0.051 |
| Group | Value (Percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | 46.7 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | 42.6 |
| Group | Value (percentage of participants) |
|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | 26.2 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | 25.5 |
| Group | Value (mmol/L) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | -0.46 | 0.155 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | 0.18 | 0.150 |
| Group | Value (mmol/L) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | -0.14 | 0.050 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | -0.03 | 0.049 |
| Group | Value (mmol/L) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | -0.04 | 0.012 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | 0.03 | 0.012 |
| Group | Value (mmol/L) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | -0.12 | 0.042 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | -0.03 | 0.042 |
| Group | Value (kg) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET) | -2.45 | 0.255 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT) | 2.11 | 0.247 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exenatide (BET)Basal Insulin/Glargine, Exenatide and Metformin Therapy (BET) | – | 23 / 315 | 228 / 315 |
| Insulin Lispro (BBT)Basal Insulin/Glargine, Bolus Insulin Lispro and Metformin Therapy (BBT) | – | 26 / 312 | 175 / 312 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
No study cites this trial.
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated