Change in Spine Bone Density From Baseline to 2 Years
| Group | Value (percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Denosumab ONLY | 8.3 | 3.4 |
| Teriparatide (Forteo®) ONLY | 9.5 | 5.9 |
| Denosumab and Teriparatide (Forteo®) | 12.9 | 5.0 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 2Results postedRegistry dataShort name DATA
United States
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
The aim of this study is to determine whether denosumab (an FDA-approved osteoporosis therapy), in combination with teriparatide (an FDA-approved osteoporosis therapy), will increase bone mineral density more than either one alone in postmenopausal osteoporotic women.
Experimental
denosumab ONLY
Experimental
teriparatide (Forteo®) ONLY
Experimental
denosumab and teriparatide (Forteo®)
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change in Spine Bone Density From Baseline to 2 Years
Time frame · Baseline and 2 years
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (percent change) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Denosumab ONLY | 8.3 | 3.4 |
| Teriparatide (Forteo®) ONLY | 9.5 | 5.9 |
| Denosumab and Teriparatide (Forteo®) | 12.9 | 5.0 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denosumab ONLYdenosumab: denosumab: 60 mg SC every 6 months | – | 1 / 33 | 4 / 33 |
| Teriparatide (Forteo®) ONLYteriparatide: teriparatide: 20 mcg SC QD | – | 2 / 31 | 5 / 31 |
| Denosumab and Teriparatide (Forteo®)denosumab: denosumab: 60 mg SC every 6 months teriparatide: teriparatide: 20 mcg SC QD | – | 1 / 30 | 4 / 30 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
5 studies on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2016
Tsai et al. 2016The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolismcited by 84
PMID 26964731PMC4870854DOI 10.1210/jc.2016-1160PUB-26964731
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2015
Leder et al. 2015Lancet (London, England)cited by 426
PMID 26144908PMC4620731DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)61120-5PUB-26144908
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2013
Tsai et al. 2013Lancet (London, England)cited by 335
PMID 23683600PMC4083737DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60856-9PUB-23683600
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2001
Neer et al. 2001The New England journal of medicinecited by 3,051
PMID 11346808DOI 10.1056/nejm200105103441904PUB-11346808
Indexing hint: Animal study · 2001
Kostenuik et al. 2001Endocrinologycited by 97
PMID 11564687DOI 10.1210/endo.142.10.8437PUB-11564687
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Clinical trial · 2014
Yu et al. 2014Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Researchcited by 23
PMID 24420643PMC4564394DOI 10.1002/jbmr.2171PUB-24420643
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated