Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)
| Group | Value (milliliter) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -37.2 | 16.8 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -39.0 | 17.7 |
Trial · Interventional
CompletedPhase 3Results postedRegistry dataBelgium, Denmark, Finland, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Turkey (Türkiye)
1 trial · 1 completed · 1 with posted results
Investigation of the Effect of Degarelix in Terms of Prostate Volume Reduction in Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT00884273Aug 2009 to Mar 2011
Text and fields below are the sponsor's entries at ClinicalTrials.gov, shown as posted.
This was a Phase 3b clinical study in prostate cancer patients which aimed to compare the current standard therapy of a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, goserelin (3.6 mg; plus anti-androgen flare protection, bicalutamide), to a novel GnRH antagonist, degarelix (240 mg starting dose/80 mg maintenance dose) with respect to mean percentage reduction in prostate volume. The hypothesis was that degarelix could decrease prostate size at least as effectively as the combination of a GnRH agonist with an anti-androgen for flare protection.
Experimental
Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg
The degarelix doses were administered into the abdominal wall every 28 days. A starting dose of 240 mg (40 mg/mL) degarelix was administered on Day 0 as two 3 mL subcutaneous (s.c.) injections. The second and third doses of 80 mg (20 mg/mL) degarelix were administered as single 4 mL s.c. injections on Days 28 and 56, respectively.
Active comparator
Goserelin (3.6 mg) + bicalutamide (50 mg)
Goserelin implants (3.6 mg) were inserted s.c. into the abdominal wall every 28 days. The first dose was administered on Day 0. The second and third doses of goserelin were administered on Days 28 and 56, respectively. On Day 0, participants began once-daily per-oral (p.o.) treatment with bicalutamide (50 mg) as anti-androgen flare protection; this treatment continued for 28 days after the first dose of goserelin.
Outcomes the sponsor listed as primary.
Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Full Analysis Set)
Time frame · After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline
TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate.
Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS) at Week 12 (Per Protocol Analysis Set)
Time frame · After treatment of 12 weeks compared to Baseline
TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate.
Change From Baseline in Prostate Size Based on TRUS at Week 4 and 8
Time frame · After treatment of 4 and 8 weeks compared to Baseline
TRUS is a method of measuring the size of the prostate.
Change From Baseline in Total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) at Week 4, 8, and 12
Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
The IPSS is a tool commonly used to assess the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), and to monitor the progress of the disease once treatment has been initiated. The participant completes a questionnaire containing 7 questions regarding incomplete emptying, frequency, intermittency, urgency, weak stream, straining, and nocturia. Each question is assigned a score of 0-5. The total score is then classified according to the following scale: 0 to 7 = mildly symptomatic; 8 to 19 = moderately symptomatic; and 20 to 35 = severely symptomatic.
Change in Serum Testosterone Levels During the Study
Time frame · At 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to baseline.
Change in Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Levels During the Study
Time frame · At 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to baseline.
Change From Baseline in Quality of Life (QoL) Related to Urinary Symptoms at Each Visit
Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
The IPSS questionnaire included an additional single question to assess the participant's QoL in relation to his urinary symptoms. The question was: 'If you were to spend the rest of your life with your urinary condition the way it is now, how would you feel about that?' The possible answers to this question ranged from 'delighted' (a score of '0') to 'terrible' (a score of '6').
Change From Baseline in Burden of Urinary Symptoms Based on the Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII)
Time frame · After treatment of 4, 8, and 12 weeks compared to Baseline
The Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Impact Index (BPHII) is a self-administered questionnaire to measure how much urinary problems affect various domains of health. The higher value the worse are the urinary problems. The minimum possible total value is 0 and the maximum possible total value is 16.
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Vital Signs and Body Weight
Time frame · Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
This outcome measure included incidence of markedly abnormal changes in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic), pulse, and body weight. The table presents the number of participants with normal baseline and at least one post-baseline markedly abnormal value.
Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Values in Safety Laboratory Variables
Time frame · Baseline to 12 weeks of treatment
The figures present the number of participants who had abnormal (defined as above upper limit of normal range (ULN)) levels of safety laboratory variables. Only the laboratory variables that had at least one percentage of participants in either group with abnormal value are presented, more variables were included in the study.
Values are shown as posted at ClinicalTrials.gov, with their units. PepBank has not converted, pooled or compared them.
| Group | Value (milliliter) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -37.2 | 16.8 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -39.0 | 17.7 |
| Group | Value (milliliter) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -19.2 | 15.2 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -21.2 | 17.7 |
| Group | Value (scores on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -2.09 | 4.36 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -1.36 | 5.86 |
| Group | Value (nanograms per milliliter) |
|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -3.91 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -4.17 |
| Group | Value (nanograms per milliliter) |
|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -20.25 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -12.10 |
| Group | Value (scores on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -0.46 | 1.43 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -0.56 | 1.30 |
| Group | Value (scores on a scale) | Spread |
|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | -0.78 | 2.03 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | -0.70 | 2.34 |
| Group | Value (participants) |
|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mg | 0 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg) | 0 |
| Group | Deaths | Serious events | Other events |
|---|---|---|---|
| Degarelix 240 mg/80 mgThe degarelix doses were administered into the abdominal wall every 28 days. A starting dose of 240 mg (40 mg/mL) degarelix was administered on Day 0 as two 3 mL subcutaneous (s.c.) injections. The second and third doses of 80 mg (20 mg/mL) degarelix were administered as single 4 mL s.c. injections on Days 28 and 56, respectively. | – | 1 / 84 | 33 / 84 |
| Goserelin (3.6 mg) + Bicalutamide (50 mg)Goserelin implants (3.6 mg) were inserted s.c. into the abdominal wall every 28 days. The first dose was administered on Day 0. The second and third doses of goserelin were administered on Days 28 and 56, respectively. On Day 0, participants began once-daily per-oral (p.o.) treatment with bicalutamide (50 mg) as anti-androgen flare protection; this treatment continued for 28 days after the first dose of goserelin. | – | 7 / 98 | 47 / 98 |
Each cell reads participants affected / participants at risk, as the registry posted them.
Registry data comes from ClinicalTrials.gov. Study results come from studies, not from the registry. How PepBank works
Studies that cite this trial.
1 study on this page
Indexing hint: Randomized controlled trial · 2012
Axcrona et al. 2012BJU internationalcited by 81
PMID 22500884DOI 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2012.11107.xPUB-22500884
References listed at the registry that are not in PepBank. They link to PubMed.
Who could join, as posted.
PepBank is a research reference. Talk to a doctor before you use any peptide.
In PepBank now:147 peptides, 6 blends and 13 other compounds97,577 study results from 17,383 studies8,473 clinical trialsUpdated